PDA

View Full Version : Canon 1200mm lens


SD70MACMAN
02-22-2007, 06:49 AM
Yes, you read that right, a 1200 millimeter lens at f/5.6. Thats pretty damn fast for a lens that size. And with a 2x multiplier, it turns into a 2400mm lens at f/8. There are believed to be only about 12 of these lenses in the world. I found it surfing around Wikipedia. Its a beast.
Official Canon site & picture: http://www.canon-europe.com/For_Home/Product_Finder/Cameras/EF_Lenses/Fixed_Focal_Length/EF_1200mm_f56L_USM/
Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_EF_1200mm_lens

Drewster
02-22-2007, 08:35 AM
HOLY CRAP! thats rediculously crazy, thats a telescope, probably can see the flag on the moon with that thing

nwrails
02-22-2007, 08:53 AM
And only for the low price of $89,579.... It weighs more then 36lbs and it would required a 2nd Tripod just to hold it? :-P

Daniel

JRMDC
02-22-2007, 07:02 PM
I vaguely recall someone posting an image here a few months ago.

BTW, with 2x con verter, it will only be f/11. :D

JRMDC
02-22-2007, 07:43 PM
Oh, c'mon, we can all do 1200! Just take a $1000 400mm f/5.6 lens, crop the heck out of the file! I can take my 3504x2336 file and take 1168x778 out of the middle (1/3 in each dimension). That's almost a megapixel! :) If it is perfect, might get a 3x5 print out of it!

Frederick
02-22-2007, 10:37 PM
Just use the 400mm lens with a 1.6x camera and 2x teleconverter. That would take it over 1200mm without even cropping it down.

Mark Rosnick
02-24-2007, 03:30 AM
I remember whenever Canon announced that lens. You could buy a half way decent house for 89K when origionally announced in the early '90s. I know National Geographic has at least 1, and I'm pretty certain that AP has at least 1. Don't forget the 1.6x factor with Canon digital, so it's equivelent to a 1920mm f/5.6!!!!!

trainboysd40
02-24-2007, 03:53 AM
Being a telemasher, I've been dreaming about this for years....plus, I also like shooting the moon. You get the picture. :)

Save The Wave
02-24-2007, 11:46 PM
http://www.pbase.com/robert/image/67748045


Sweet!

Mgoldman
02-25-2007, 12:19 AM
Wow, that is sweet! I'd like to see that person.

Ooops, I mean in person.

JimThias
02-25-2007, 05:24 PM
Just use the 400mm lens with a 1.6x camera and 2x teleconverter. That would take it over 1200mm without even cropping it down.

Only problem is, you lose some major stoppage. Forget about shooting anything moving without some ideal light or bumping the ISO way up. At least that 1200mm lens is still at f/5.6.


http://www.pbase.com/robert/image/67748045


Sweet!

So, which would YOU take? :lol:

http://i.pbase.com/t5/33/205833/4/67740140.89rQRA4P.jpg (http://k53.pbase.com/o5/33/205833/1/67740140.ENQGzv9h.Canon12003.jpg)

Fotaugrafee, Ink.
02-26-2007, 03:17 AM
It's a beautiful piece of equipment that, unfortunately, costs more than most new Lexus vehicles.

Canon Camera Museum (http://www.canon.com/camera-museum/camera/lens/ef/data/ef_1200_56l_usm.html)

This website is golden, esp. if you like to know when a certain lens was produced / released, as I do.

Yes, you read that right, a 1200 millimeter lens at f/5.6. Thats pretty damn fast for a lens that size. And with a 2x multiplier, it turns into a 2400mm lens at f/8. There are believed to be only about 12 of these lenses in the world. I found it surfing around Wikipedia.

Its a beast.

Sorry, but I don't put that much trust into multiple teleconversion devices. The 1.6x from my 20D is plenty enough when using my 75-300mm IS. To purchase a 2x converter just to get 960mm out of that lens wouldn't be worth it, IMO.

Just use the 400mm lens with a 1.6x camera and 2x teleconverter. That would take it over 1200mm without even cropping it down.

This is friggin' disturbing!!

http://www.pbase.com/robert/image/67748045

jb17kx
03-04-2007, 04:12 AM
The concept isn't that new. Canon had such behemoths before then in the FL and FD (manual, for use with A-, F-, and T- series cameras) range

http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/companies/canon/fdresources/fdlenses/1200mm.htm

Doesn't make it any less cool though...