iCe
08-24-2003, 11:16 PM
I just got the results back from my uploads and have some questions...
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=28486 - Poor lighting (too dark)
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=28487 - backlit
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=28488 - backlit
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=28489 - Poor lighting (too dark)
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=28492 - Poor lighting (too dark)
I was just wondering...are the standards getting stricter? Because I've definitely seen worse lit/darker shots in the database. Especially "28489"...it doesn't look so dark to me. Do you guys think I should appeal or is there something I can do to fix them and re-upload?
28487 and 28488 are said to be "backlit". What exactly does that mean? They look fine to me. Can I fix them?
Sorry about all the questions...but it's just a bit frustrating get all those photos rejected while seeing clearly worse photos in the database. Can someone help me?
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=28486 - Poor lighting (too dark)
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=28487 - backlit
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=28488 - backlit
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=28489 - Poor lighting (too dark)
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=28492 - Poor lighting (too dark)
I was just wondering...are the standards getting stricter? Because I've definitely seen worse lit/darker shots in the database. Especially "28489"...it doesn't look so dark to me. Do you guys think I should appeal or is there something I can do to fix them and re-upload?
28487 and 28488 are said to be "backlit". What exactly does that mean? They look fine to me. Can I fix them?
Sorry about all the questions...but it's just a bit frustrating get all those photos rejected while seeing clearly worse photos in the database. Can someone help me?