RailPictures.Net Forums

RailPictures.Net Forums (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/index.php)
-   Railroad Photography Forum (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Yep, 1st Time Image Editing = No Go (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/showthread.php?t=17213)

SantaFebuff 08-08-2014 01:49 AM

Yep, 1st Time Image Editing = No Go
 
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...14&key=8868573

Oops! I would like to know how badly I messed up on that one? (and saving of this one?)

Perhaps it has no saving grace, but in that case... how about some general techniques that are nice to know for a beginning image editor? I have Photoshop CS6.

Cheers,
Joshua

Mgoldman 08-08-2014 02:19 AM

There's a lot of that going around these days on RP.

If it were consistently applied to the rest of the images in the database, I imagine it would be halved overnight.

I'm not seeing it - but again, I only have a 27" monitor. My guess is that others will tell you that it looks like it was taken with a cell phone - I don't see it.

I do see one RP classic "flaw", however - seems somewhat centered top to bottom.

/Mitch

Freericks 08-08-2014 02:19 AM

Maybe my eyes are going but I don't see the IQ issue. I do think the train is too centered (You could lose some sky).

Freericks 08-08-2014 02:20 AM

I am NOT copying Mitch - we posted at the same time... we are brothers from different families and mothers (and political parities).

troy12n 08-08-2014 02:21 AM

Look at the number boards, it's soft. That's the majority of your problem.

I think what you need to do is get yourself a drone, it's a ticket to free shots

Mberry 08-08-2014 02:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by troy12n (Post 180952)
Look at the number boards, it's soft. That's the majority of your problem.

I think what you need to do is get yourself a drone, it's a ticket to free shots

When I looked at this, at first I didn't seen an image quality issue, but on second glance I also noticed the numberboards were a bit soft.

SantaFebuff 08-08-2014 04:41 AM

Re-did the composition of the crop a bit and gave a tad more sharpening...

...and now that has become my first picture ever on RailPictures.net!

http://www.railpictures.net/viewphot...=492950&nseq=5

Thanks guys,
Josh

Freericks 08-08-2014 10:30 AM

Congrats!

Additional words to make the computer allow the post.

bigbassloyd 08-08-2014 11:43 AM

Mitch, all I can say is size doesn't matter.. lol

I've never owned a monitor larger than 17", but there has to be a resolution issue or something if you're not seeing rather obvious issues on that 27" :D

I should hook my laptop up through my living room TV and see if I start seeing differently.

Loyd L.

KevinM 08-08-2014 12:21 PM

Hi Josh,

Are you shooting in one of the camera's automatic modes? I see on your EXIF that you were at 1/320th at f/9. Why not go 1/400th at f/8. When shooting trains, I rarely find a need for an aperture tighter than f/8, and once you're there, the more shutter speed you can get the lower the probability of a soft image. If those settings were selected by the camera, you might consider shooting manual exposure. Under most circumstances, when you have an opportunity for a test shot, manual is the best way to go. Even in situations where you have to shoot on the spur of the moment, if you have practiced shooting manual, you will likely be close enough on the exposure to be able to work with the shot in post.

Just a suggestion....

SantaFebuff 08-08-2014 01:13 PM

Kevin,
I believe this is one of my earlier shots that I did have it on automatic. Usually I put it on manual or a speed-shutter mode where I get a faster shutter nowadays.

I also got this one in, although the shot was kind of given to my by the spot I was in.

http://www.railpictures.net/viewphot...=492967&nseq=0

Cheers,
Joshua

MagnumForce 08-08-2014 08:24 PM

Looks like it was shot on a cell phone. Everything is really soft and not in a blurry or unfocused way.

JimThias 08-09-2014 02:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freericks (Post 180956)
Congrats!

Additional words to make the computer allow the post.

..........

Mgoldman 08-09-2014 03:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigbassloyd (Post 180957)
Mitch, all I can say is size doesn't matter.. lol

Loyd L.

Tell that to Jim - have you seen his lens shade!?!??

/Mitch

Freericks 08-09-2014 03:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimThias (Post 180962)
..........

Bastard..............

SantaFebuff 08-09-2014 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagnumForce (Post 180960)
Looks like it was shot on a cell phone. Everything is really soft and not in a blurry or unfocused way.

Using a Nikon D5100... I might have something set wrong?

JimThias 08-10-2014 03:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freericks (Post 180965)
Bastard..............

http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/s...aughing002.gif

wds 08-10-2014 03:48 AM

Joshua, the first thing I noticed about the rejected shot was massive amounts of haloing in the sky around the trees and locomotive roofline which isn't apparent in the accepted shot. I also thought the sky looked a bit noisy in both versions, but that could just be my eyes - sometimes I see it when it's not there, sometimes I don't when it is! :lol:

wds 08-10-2014 03:53 AM

Geez, maybe I shouldn't have said "massive"! Looking at the shot for a third or fourth time, I'm hardly noticing it. I did mention my eyes could be not quite up to snuff, did I not?

JRMDC 08-10-2014 04:50 AM

Nope, you were right the first time, massive is a reasonable thing to say. Does not appear in the accepted version.


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.