RailPictures.Net Forums

RailPictures.Net Forums (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/index.php)
-   Railroad Photography Forum (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   A couple more rejections (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/showthread.php?t=2081)

milepost 48.1 06-30-2005 07:50 AM

A couple more rejections
 
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=141197 - bad cropping
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=141195 - bad angle

So, are any of these worth trying to fix?

Ru1056 06-30-2005 08:50 AM

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=141197

On this one try cropping the sky and maybe a bit off of the left.

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=141195

Don't know what else you can do with this one.

milepost 48.1 06-30-2005 09:20 AM

thanks, I'll give that a try.

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=141198

I also have to mention this one, because it was rejected for "Poor lighting (Cloudy): Common angle cloudy day shots of common/standard power
are generally not accepted" and "Obstructing Objects (Foreground Clutter)." Now while I can agree with the "foreground clutter" (but hey, it's a lift bridge, what do you expect), that was shot in full sun, and there wasn't a cloud in sight. I could interpret that as meaning the lighting is just bad because the angle of the sun was too high, but the screener didn't write that, he said it was "cloudy." I've had a few other shots rejected for the same exact reason when the photo was shot in full sun, and it's really starting to bug me.

ssw9662 06-30-2005 12:59 PM

Next time you go to that location, cut off the girder and see what happens. :lol:

Ru1056 06-30-2005 01:31 PM

Also, the photos all looked washed out to me. Maybe more saturation would help. Sorry, I couldn't access the website for some reason earlier.

Guilford350 06-30-2005 03:10 PM

I would crop the dead space on the left.

busyEMT 06-30-2005 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guilford350
I would crop the dead space on the left.

Yep, I would go to the fence post.

With the second (original) photo, the BNSF unit appears to be the focus. I am sure you meant for the passenger train to be the main emphasis. I don't see this one getting by.

I love the bridge. But in this picture, I guessed "foreground clutter" rejection before I read your comment. You would have a better chance for acceptance if the train was going from left to right and the lead unit is where 5006 is.

That's how I see it. Oh yeah, ditto:
Quote:

Originally Posted by ru1056
Also, the photos all looked washed out to me.



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.