RailPictures.Net Forums

RailPictures.Net Forums (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/index.php)
-   Railroad Photography Forum (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Jumping Ship for Flickr? (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/showthread.php?t=17039)

Ron Flanary 04-18-2014 03:05 AM

Jumping Ship for Flickr?
 
I'm hearing from more and more veteran photographers who are just quietly walking away from RP.net and its periodic drama in favor of posting their shots on Flickr. Of course that's much easier, and lacks a number of features that make RP.net desirable---but if their goal is just to share images on line with others (particularly like-minded photographers), it's a great option. Of course no one is voting on PCAs, or offering advice on how to crop a shot, or level it or improve the color or contrast----because no one is asking, and no one cares. Sure, there's a lot of crap on Flickr, but I'll likely view only the shots of photographers I know to be good.

I haven't started doing that (a Flickr account)...but I think I will. While I don't think you'll see a mass exodus from RP.net, I would be willing to bet some of the better OLD photographers will just stop submitting images. That's what I would do (or more likely, I wouldn't upload images at anywhere near the pace I have in earlier years).

I don't think this will damage RP.net at all, but it will make "room" for younger photographers to show their efforts. And, that's a good thing. It's just part of an evolving process, and people tend to eventually vote with their feet.

MagnumForce 04-18-2014 03:12 AM

You'll be amazed at how much easier and user frendly Flickr is, very surprised. Be sure to include full captions and you will be good to go. Build a group of great photographers and you will never see crap shots. The best way to do that is to look at who other well respected photogs are following.

nikos1 04-18-2014 04:06 AM

RP is good for people just getting started, it definitely helped me with some of the basics that wouldve taken longer to learn otherwise. Now though Flickr is just so much more convenient, I can upload however many shots I want and I will get far more comments than I ever would on RP. With 2 slots a day uploading to RP just isn't fun anymore, especially when 1 or 2 of those get rejected for reasons that you can find several examples per day that were worse and accepted. Ive noticed alot of mediocrity get accepted here lately that would not have gotten on in the past, or maybe its just less good shots?

Coloradorailfan 04-18-2014 04:28 AM

Flickr in my opinion is the best way to show case your work and I mean anything, not just trains, for those who photograph other things besides trains. It's a huge community and I have seen great work on there from notable photographers and ones I've never heard of. It's pretty much one giant portfolio website that you have 100% control over. I love having it and it doesn't make myself rely on Facebook and RP.net to showcase my work. It certainly has grown a lot these past couple of years and it's nice seeing familiar faces on there show casing their work and finding new photographers.

magicman_841 04-18-2014 04:47 AM

Flickr über alles.

Bo Gray 04-18-2014 04:59 AM

Ron...I've been a Flickr member since 2006 and, even with all the recent upheaval at Yahoo (the corporation behind the curtain) it's still a decent photo community made up of some very thoughtful and creative folks. Most of them would be happy to offer suggestions on cropping, color or contrast if the posting photographer simply asks for such advice.

Since railroad photography is only one facet of my creative vision, Flickr allows me the "elbow room" and the freedom to post up any crazy image that I might come up with. Thanks to my contacts on Flickr, I've corresponded with...and even met face-to-face...several talented, nice, interesting people who happen to also be photographers. I have contacts who shoot heritage steam in the UK, race cars in Canada and street scenes all over the world.

There are plenty of other photo sharing sites...Mr. and Mrs. Bell use PBase for example...but I like Flickr's balance of photo sharing and social media. I've also had a few images spotted on Flickr by editors and designers who wound up licensing an image for publication. That's not my main goal with Flickr, but it's a nice side benefit.

And there's no reason to walk away from RP...Flickr works just fine in addition to RP.net, Facebook or any other photo site.

Worth a look-see if nothing else.

Bo Gray
Lexington, KY
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bogray
https://www.facebook/bograyphotography

troy12n 04-18-2014 11:18 AM

I think it says more about this place's non-user friendly environment and complete lack of customer service. I think they forget that we are their customers sometimes, and you can only get away with not treating customers right for so long before people find an alternative.

I have said it before, but there is a lot of crap on Flickr, just like RRPictureArchives because it's not moderated. But there is also some very, very good stuff.

But at the same time, good photographers, and "so called" good photographers who feel they are above moderation or criticism dont have to deal with the issues people dont like about this place there...

JimThias 04-18-2014 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by troy12n (Post 177728)
I have said it before, but there is a lot of crap on Flickr, just like RRPictureArchives because it's not moderated. But there is also some very, very good stuff.

I used to think that before, but then again, I didn't fully understand how flickr worked. If you don't want to see any crap, then don't "follow" anyone who takes crappy pics. And since I can choose whose photos I'd like to see, I rarely see anything that's much crappier than the crappiest on RP. :smile:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo Gray (Post 177724)
Ron...I've been a Flickr member since 2006...

{click} Following. :-)

Mberry 04-18-2014 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimThias (Post 177730)

{click} Following. :-)

Same! :-):-)

KevinM 04-18-2014 03:07 PM

I've been toying with the idea of starting what I call a "Pivotal Rejections" thread here on the forums. I continually read threads from folks who have either stopped posting here, or who keep threatening to stop posting, indicating that they are honked off at the site, probably over one rejection or another. My proposed thread would be a place for each of the PO'd OPs :D to show us the images. If they've been posting for years and now consider themselves fit to be tied with RP, then let's see 'em. Let's see those gems that never made it here, and left them so miffed that they would rather display their material in places where it is much harder to find.

In my case, when I look in the bit-bucket, I can't honestly find anything that I would be comfortable posting in such a thread and say with a straight face: "Damn it, this DESERVES to be here." Yes, I've had some shots bounced that have left me with a bad taste in my mouth, but in the case of images that I really cared about, they have pretty much all been accepted on appeal.

All of us need a place in addition to RP to post our work. RP is a privately owned site and the owners are entitled to decide what their product will look like. If they want to advertise that product as "The best railroad photos on the net", they pay the bills and they have the right. This site is not and never has been a place to post EVERYTHING. I think everyone should have a Flickr Account, or a Smugmug Site, or Zenfolio, or or or....whatever. In my mind, no one venue is the end-all, be-all for railroad photography or any other kind of photography.

If you love what you do, use ALL available avenues to show the world your stuff! :smile:

jdirelan87 04-18-2014 03:45 PM

Flickr has its advantages, the presentation is a lot nicer. But its not a train website and to make it a train website, one needs to commit a substantial amount of time finding people to follow/getting people to follow me. Say what you about the system of RP, but on this site I know if I dump a good photo on, literally a 1,000 people will look at it with little to no effort on my part.

Sure, some people get a thousand views on Flickr photo (and by some, I mean very few), but thats only after many, many man hours of making contacts, adding photos to groups, linking said photos to other websites, etc. I don't have the time nor interest to do that. And, frankly, I generally like the definition of railroad photography RP screens by, so I generally don't have problems getting shots on.

Case in point;

https://www.flickr.com/photos/107685...7/12581433764/ 71 Views

[photoid=470240] 1,077 Views

Same photo, same amount of work "promoting it," 15 times the views on RP.

bigbassloyd 04-18-2014 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevinM (Post 177734)
I've been toying with the idea of starting what I call a "Pivotal Rejections" thread here on the forums.

While I have no intention of leaving, I would participate with some of my personal WTF's. :D

Loyd L.

Joe the Photog 04-18-2014 05:08 PM

The funny thing is that when Flickr went through their first sight redesign a few months ago, people were dropping off that site like flies. Some people never came back. I looked around for another site like Flickr and never really found one. I still prefer the old Flickr, but I use that site as much if not more than RP. Until I went on Fine Art America, Flickr was where I sold most of my work that sold.

ken45 04-18-2014 07:52 PM

This will be a long post, because I've been thinking about this very thing lately.

I'm an RP guy. Exposure to RP really helped finally get me kick-started into taking better pictures. I like the quality of photos, which varies from average to great. I like that I can see everyones uploads each day. I like the search functions that are provided. RP would have to really screw up for me to permanently leave.

Considering that the common thread that brings us all together is that we all take pictures of choo choo trains, it is amazing the egos you encounter in this hobby. I know this because I have a huge one. The thing with egos, is they cause you to completely lose perspective on things. The mass migration of the "good" photographers over to Flickr is because their ego can't take that a few of their shots they thought were great were rejected from this site because the screener on this site didn't think it fit what the site was going for. Here's a thought: Since when do ALL your good shots HAVE to be on RP? Or if they aren't, you're taking your ball and going to Flickr? You know the standards. You know what shots fit and which ones toe the line. If the borderline one gets rejected, so what? Post it to Flickr. Why deny uploading the RP acceptable one because the borderline ones aren't making it?

The thing that really amazes me is after badmouthing RP, in the very next breath, they'll say that they use RP for researching photo trips. That annoys me. You'll use my shots to research trips and find great angles, but you won't chip in a small handful of shots per year to contribute? I met a photographer once who went off on RP, and yet seemed to have good knowledge of a great number of shots I'd posted there. Why not throw up a couple shots? Think of the photographers that left. What if each one of them posted 1 shot per month. Just one. Doesn't have to be this revolutionary, boundary pushing shot. There would be a noticeable increase in image quality in the daily uploads.

Someone posted a few days ago that the ideal mix would be a combination of RP, Flickr, and Personal Website. I agree with this completely, and it's the path I've chosen. I post to RP, because I like the site and like to contribute to it from time to time. It gets me the most exposure and views. I also post to Flickr from time to time. I enjoy the non-RP photographers I find there, and again, want to give a little back since they were willing to share their photos with me. Finally, I started a personal website several years ago simply for my own enjoyment. I wanted a nice place to post photos to share with specific people who expressed interest in my photography, and to have a good place for non-train photos.

I'm going to break off here and leave two final thought. RP certainly has its imperfections, but it is a good place to share high-quality photographs. It is disappointing that the site owners are so checked out that they don't even contribute photos to their own site. It is disappointing to see the quality of photos diluted because of the ego of many talented photographers who had one too many shots rejected. But it is still a good place to me. Am I going to let the minor things I don't like keep me away, or am I going to focus on the good and keep sharing my photos here? I think I'm going to be part of the solution rather than the problem, and try to get back to uploading 1 shot per week. I'll try to help the new people by contributing more in the forums, and writing in my new blog some posts that might help them understand why their photos are rejected and the very simple steps that can be taken to improve them.

Finally, and this is just thinking out loud, I'm curious what the value of the site is. I wonder if a group of people would like this site and want to improve it to the point that they would contribute money to buy the site and pay to make upgrades to it to really make it great? Ad revenue over the long term could help replenish the initial out of pocket cost. Rather than 2 admins and 3-4 additional screeners, what if a group of 30 people ran the site? Rather than 1 screener judging whether a photo gets on, make it 2 out of 3? Maybe once a person gets 100 photos on the site and shows they know what they're doing, make a provision that they can add rejected photos to their portfolio up to 10% of their current number of accepted shots? So with 305 shots on the site, if a shot of mine gets shot down, I have 30 slots of photos I can put that reject in. That keeps the quality high, while still allowing those who are totally in love with a certain shot to add it anyway. Just some thoughts.

MagnumForce 04-18-2014 08:44 PM

The reason I am almost exclusively Flickr is that it is just better and more enjoyable and there is no hassle involved, has nothing to do with being honked off at here or having a large ego, it is not even that difficult to garner an average of 300 or so views on any of my photos anymore, your work speaks for itself and people will follow you if your work is good. At the same time I see absolutely no crap and do not seek out anyone to follow anymore unless they follow me first and I check out their stuff and it is good.

The worst things I see on Flickr are no worse than the worst things here and that did not even take much work. If I want to search for a particular subject I simply search within my contacts and something always comes up, if I am looking for a particular one of my photos, same. There is no need to spend time on tags either as your caption information is searched just like a tag so include a full caption, location, line, unit etc and your stuff is a click away.

On top of all that most railfans will "like" anything train related, we are part of the ten percent that will say "no, that sucks" I think here is like that and Facebook totally is. So who cares about those views? I get views from the individuals I really care about on Flickr, and when my shots get explore I get a kinds of accolades from real artists that shoot amazing things that have nothing to do with Choo choos. I have one shot with 40,000 views over there that got 400 here. On average I get around 1500 views a day on all my pictures combined over there even without uploading anything. Over here I never get that unless I upload which is incredibly rare any longer. I just enjoy Flickr so much and the community there is awesome.

troy12n 04-18-2014 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe the Photog (Post 177740)
The funny thing is that when Flickr went through their first sight redesign a few months ago, people were dropping off that site like flies. Some people never came back. I looked around for another site like Flickr and never really found one. I still prefer the old Flickr, but I use that site as much if not more than RP. Until I went on Fine Art America, Flickr was where I sold most of my work that sold.

Their site redesign still sucks. People just got used to it or gave up with trying to find an alternative

Yahoo is one of the worst run internet companies now. I guess that's what happens when you hire a 20 something unqualified woman as CEO who has no work ethic (look her up, and her personal telecommute policy)

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimThias (Post 177730)
I used to think that before, but then again, I didn't fully understand how flickr worked. If you don't want to see any crap, then don't "follow" anyone who takes crappy pics. And since I can choose whose photos I'd like to see, I rarely see anything that's much crappier than the crappiest on RP. :smile:

That works fine as long as you JUST follow well known or at least good photographers. Try searching for a specific RR or something, you find some stuff worse than on RRPictureArchives.net

MagnumForce 04-18-2014 11:38 PM

Troy, you just don't understand how Flickr works. You don't use it that way, that is the point.

Harry Gaydosz 04-19-2014 01:06 AM

King Troy has spoken. Flickr sucks.

JimThias 04-19-2014 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by troy12n (Post 177747)

That works fine as long as you JUST follow well known or at least good photographers. Try searching for a specific RR or something, you find some stuff worse than on RRPictureArchives.net

Why would I want to search for something on flickr when I have access to a great search function on RP? I use flickr to look at pictures that are uploaded by photographers I am following. That's all I have time for there anyway. It's just a nice image gallery to gaze at. If I need any searching, RP is the here for that.

Missabefan 04-19-2014 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron Flanary (Post 177712)
I'm hearing from more and more veteran photographers who are just quietly walking away from RP.net and its periodic drama in favor of posting their shots on Flickr.

Between this thread and Ron's other thread about Bad Cropping--On MY!
I'd be curious to know what the men behind the curtain have to say. What are their opinions?

Ron, when your out with Chase photographing trains or contributing to Railroad photography presentations etc. ( or others) do you guys talk RP and whatever it means to the Universe?

MagnumForce 04-19-2014 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimThias (Post 177754)
Why would I want to search for something on flickr when I have access to a great search function on RP? I use flickr to look at pictures that are uploaded by photographers I am following. That's all I have time for there anyway. It's just a nice image gallery to gaze at. If I need any searching, RP is the here for that.

Jim, Flickr works better at that than you think. Search and then select your contacts. You will be surprised.

JimThias 04-19-2014 02:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagnumForce (Post 177758)
Jim, Flickr works better at that than you think. Search and then select your contacts. You will be surprised.

Well, I'm talking about the type of searching I'd do on RP, like loco #'s and whatnot. I don't need to do that on flickr. I just want to look at pretty pictures there. :grin:

Ron Flanary 04-19-2014 03:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagnumForce (Post 177744)
The reason I am almost exclusively Flickr is that it is just better and more enjoyable and there is no hassle involved, has nothing to do with being honked off at here or having a large ego, it is not even that difficult to garner an average of 300 or so views on any of my photos anymore, your work speaks for itself and people will follow you if your work is good. At the same time I see absolutely no crap and do not seek out anyone to follow anymore unless they follow me first and I check out their stuff and it is good.

That's exactly how I feel!

Yes, I have an ego. No, I'm not ticked off at RP, and I'm not going to demand all my images be removed. The guys who started this site are my friends, and they'll continue to be my friends.

It matters not that one of my shots has 17 views, or 17,000. I look at the 3000 or so shots I have on this site, and take particular interest in the most popular, by views. WTF?! These are NOT the shots I'm most proud of! How I see myself as a photographer--good or bad---is never measured by PCA votes, "favoriteds," or unique views. I have no interest in keeping score.

Flickr appeals to me (although I haven't even started yet...) because I can select a group of shots---old ones, new ones, scanned slides, or digital images---and post them without asking "pretty, pretty please---put this image on your site so people will like me..." And, I get tired of tweaking shots for this little thing or that thing just to appease some man behind the curtain. I can assure you 99 percent of viewers aren't that concerned with many of the innocuous details that screeners worry with here.

So---Flickr is, more than anything, stress-free! I will never have to get ticked off with a rejection. Will I stop posting to RP.net? Well---probably not, because I've invested quite a bit of effort over many years (more than a decade), and I've made many acquaintances because of it. I would like to think I'm richer (figuratively) for the experience.

I'm not ticked at RP.net---but it is important to note that many people vote with their feet (as I initially noted). I do think the younger photographers will continue to place great value in RP.net for the learning experience, and that's a good thing. But---you sure can't teach some old crusty hard-headed jerk like me! :)

Ron Flanary 04-19-2014 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Missabefan (Post 177757)
Ron, when your out with Chase photographing trains or contributing to Railroad photography presentations etc. ( or others) do you guys talk RP and whatever it means to the Universe?

We do not. I wouldn't even bring up RP.net in a conversation with Chase. We take pictures and enjoy our time together.

Missabefan 04-19-2014 04:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron Flanary (Post 177762)
We do not. I wouldn't even bring up RP.net in a conversation with Chase. We take pictures and enjoy our time together.


Well that's good. Never mix business and pleasure but like I said, I would be curious to know their thoughts about RP and the direction it's heading or where it's going because every now and again on of these threads gets going between RP vs. Flickr. I say do both. If it's rejected here, put it there. No fuss no muss. Either one is fine and serves it's purpose but neither is worth losing sleep or sanity over.

Flowing 04-19-2014 06:10 AM

I post here because I like the database format. Search by railroad, locomotive type, location, what have you... I like that aspect of it. Rejects or 'unworthies' go to rrpicturearchives.net - because, again, it's a railroad-oriented database, searchable by things that matter to me as a railfan.

CSX1702 04-19-2014 06:14 AM

http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instanc...x/48736139.jpg

Holloran Grade 04-19-2014 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ken45 (Post 177742)
.....The mass migration of the "good" photographers over to Flickr is because their ego can't take that a few of their shots they thought were great were rejected from this site because the screener on this site didn't think it fit what the site was going for.

That is not my observation after talking to a few of the "biggies" who gave up on RP.

One big complaint was that RP didn't give them any leeway regarding image quality on pictures taken 20 or more years ago.

The feeling was that the scans of slides, or prints was only going to be so good, because the photographic media of the day was limited.

Consequently, RP robbed us of viewing some really fantastic historical treasures, simply because they were "grainy" or cropped wrong.

Another complaint was the piddly rejections based on someone's subjective view of what a train photo was supposed to look like.

For instance - the blanket rejection for dark side images and back lighting.

Finally, it came down to the amount of time that said individuals felt they were putting in to get images accepted - it just was not worth it.

Perhaps it was ego, but it seems to me through talking with them and my own experience, that it just takes too much time to fiddle around with stuff to get it posted.

(I don't even fill out the captions anymore unless the photo is accepted.)


Quote:

Originally Posted by ken45 (Post 177742)
Here's a thought: Since when do ALL your good shots HAVE to be on RP? Or if they aren't, you're taking your ball and going to Flickr?

Why continue to waste time?

I don't know about you, but I am not going to be here all that long, and perhaps there are other pursuits that would make a better use of my time.


Quote:

Originally Posted by ken45 (Post 177742)
Why deny uploading the RP acceptable one because the borderline ones aren't making it?

Because what makes it on any given day is a crap shoot and there are some good reruns of All in the Family on cable.


Quote:

Originally Posted by ken45 (Post 177742)
in the very next breath, they'll say that they use RP for researching photo trips.

Nope, never done that.


Quote:

Originally Posted by ken45 (Post 177742)
That annoys me. You'll use my shots to research trips and find great angles, but you won't chip in a small handful of shots per year to contribute?

You realize that over 90% of the people that look at your photos on this site don't post anything at all?

If you don't believe me, look at the people who have favorited your photos, most of them have not posted at all.


Quote:

Originally Posted by ken45 (Post 177742)
Why not throw up a couple shots? Think of the photographers that left. What if each one of them posted 1 shot per month. Just one. Doesn't have to be this revolutionary, boundary pushing shot. There would be a noticeable increase in image quality in the daily uploads.

Sunny day wedgies for the most part look the same, whether shot by someone like Ron (50 years under his belt) or the kid next door with a point and shoot.


Quote:

Originally Posted by ken45 (Post 177742)
I wonder if a group of people would like this site and want to improve it to the point that they would contribute money to buy the site and pay to make upgrades to it to really make it great?

I can see it now - "RP bought out by the DV Investment & Aquasitions LLC, of Sand Patch Penn.":D

MagnumForce 04-19-2014 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flowing (Post 177764)
I can't see myself uploading train photos to a pure photography site like Flickr, because on Flickr the train doesn't matter, just the image. And as a railfan, the train matters to me.

But for many of us the image matters far more than the train. Shoot the scene, not the train.

WMHeilman 04-19-2014 03:16 PM

I have lived and died by the "scene > train" rule since I really got into the photography aspect of railfanning.

MagnumForce 04-19-2014 03:27 PM

^mouthbreather

Ron Flanary 04-19-2014 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Missabefan (Post 177763)
Well that's good. Never mix business and pleasure but like I said, I would be curious to know their thoughts about RP and the direction it's heading or where it's going because every now and again on of these threads gets going between RP vs. Flickr. I say do both. If it's rejected here, put it there. No fuss no muss. Either one is fine and serves it's purpose but neither is worth losing sleep or sanity over.

Correct...except I think I would only place my "prime" shots on Flickr. That would include a few shots rejected on RP.net that are still "prime" in my opinion. :)

Ron Flanary 04-19-2014 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagnumForce (Post 177770)
But for many of us the image matters far more than the train. Shoot the scene, not the train.

AMEN!! Trains are just an element of a scene. I would prefer to think of this as capturing the essence of "railroading"---not just a stinkin' train!

Ron Flanary 04-19-2014 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Holloran Grade (Post 177769)
That is not my observation after talking to a few of the "biggies" who gave up on RP.

One big complaint was that RP didn't give them any leeway regarding image quality on pictures taken 20 or more years ago.

The feeling was that the scans of slides, or prints was only going to be so good, because the photographic media of the day was limited.

Consequently, RP robbed us of viewing some really fantastic historical treasures, simply because they were "grainy" or cropped wrong.

Another complaint was the piddly rejections based on someone's subjective view of what a train photo was supposed to look like.

For instance - the blanket rejection for dark side images and back lighting.

Finally, it came down to the amount of time that said individuals felt they were putting in to get images accepted - it just was not worth it.

Perhaps it was ego, but it seems to me through talking with them and my own experience, that it just takes too much time to fiddle around with stuff to get it posted.

(I don't even fill out the captions anymore unless the photo is accepted.)


You are absolutely dead-on correct. I do the best I can in scanning and correcting a slide taken 40 years ago. I've generally had some success (maybe 80 to 90 percent acceptance) in getting these shots on RP.net---but I do grow tired of the hassle of going through all that to appease someone. I could invest a fraction of the time, post it to Flickr, and no one would ever notice the difference. Far too much time is wasted in tweaking images for RP.net. I've even gotten a little paranoid ("....will they reject this because they THINK it's .5 degrees unlevel?....will this be rejected because the nose isn't fully illuminated?....will this be gigged because it was shot on the "dark side"?.....). Eventually, you get tired of it all. You have to decide what's worth your time....and how much time you'll put into something. Besides, there are a few of their "standards" that are just flat out archaic in terms of photography "rules" (IMHO).

I would much rather put in a fraction of the time and effort and post a shot to Flickr---and then tell my buddies: ".....Hey, Bubba...here's a link to a Rock Island passenger train I just posted to Flickr. Check it out...." And again, whether it's 20,000 people who click on that image, or just Bubba....at least Bubba and me will be happy. :)

Again---this is a hobby, it's not something I do to feed my ego. If I had that kind of need, I would have become a movie star. :)

JRMDC 04-19-2014 04:16 PM

I will freely admit that, unlike Ron, it does matter to me how many people click on my shot. I'm no so altruistic as Ron is, I am not much interested in uploading if it is only Bubba who benefits. :)

At the same time, I have not been willing to build a flickr audience - takes too much time, don't have it. And, if I wanted to build a flickr presence, I would have to be more strict in deciding what does on and what does not, so that I end up with a sufficiently attractive set that people are willing to look. In the past I used flickr as a storage space so my early stuff on there includes a number of junk shots being shared for reasons other than they look nice. That means I end up not uploading often.

But ultimately, if I want to have an internet "presence" as a rail photographer, I think I would need to have more shots to upload. As I don't get out that often, I do not, and so I can't create that presence or that "name", so I don't push the flickr, or upload to one of the general FB groups. Some day ...

Ron Flanary 04-19-2014 04:28 PM

Well....as a disclaimer, I must admit I've had more magazine articles published over the years than I deserve, and those (in Trains, at least) each got about 100,000 "hits." Consequently, the popularity of any shot I post to RP.net isn't quite that big of deal.

That said...if I have a shot that's fairly popular, or makes Shot of the Day or whatever....sure, it brings a smile to my face. We're all motivated by stuff like that (or we should be...). It's all human nature.

If I have a train shot that I just thought was the absolutely berries, but no one else gave it a good word (or maybe it was met with mass indifference)....yes, I would a little hurt. And conversely, if I get praise for something I've done....yes, I'm pleased.

But, RP.net isn't the main motivator in my life. I think that was my point (not clearly made, however).

Holloran Grade 04-19-2014 04:56 PM

My Thoughts.
 
Well in my experience, RP had it's place originally as it caused me to format shots that were more in line with what we all expect to see in a railroad shot.

Also, when I was a newbie, I had some goals that I wanted to establish on RP, such as number of shots in the DB, reaching 10,000 views with a shot, getting a top 2 of 24 etc.

My reason for doing that was totally based on my competitive nature, and the fact that RP screening was such a game - and I only had 2 uploads a day.

Now a number of years later, and having realized those goals, the allure of the chase has warn off, so I just don't have the want to waste time fiddling.

Additionally, people know who I am in other venues now, so the need to have a major presence on RP is not critical. (Most of my referrals come from Flickr photos now.)

In my opinion, RP is good for beginners and I am not going to leave, but I now understand why professional photogs like Steve Crise have so few uploads - it is just too much trouble and too time consuming.

Also, somewhere along the way in my quest for RP grandure, I lost sight of my personal expression and substituted the cookie cutter methodology that RP has become known for - in essence, I became a robot.

Sure, I got photos accepted, some of them I was even proud of, but most were just the same old stuff, nothing special, or in any way creative.

I eventually found myself shooting things in the field they way I thought they would be accepted. I also found that I was processing and cropping to second guess the screeners.

So, I have taken a new attitude about all this and moved on.

Sure I will continue to post here, but I am not going to waste any more time fiddling with stuff.

kszok 04-19-2014 06:44 PM

I've been submitting images to RP since April 2004 (back when there were no limits on uploads per day). Even then it was hit or miss, but not as quirky as it is today. I also post on flickr where I have a variety of photos that I like to share with my contacts or any others who happen to stop by and take a look.

Photography is something I enjoy and keep working at. Some day I might even be good at it, but its not my profession. It's my hobby. I have gotten tired of the RP screening game, but it does mean that I won't be submitting images to RP. The site has its place and offers exposure to a specific audience. If a shot gets rejected, I will take into consideration the reason for the rejection and decide if I agree or not. I rarely appeal a rejection from RP. I shoot what I like and share what I think is worth sharing, mostly on flickr now.

Harry Gaydosz 04-19-2014 09:40 PM

If I post a shot here and it's accepted, great.

If it isn't, and it's due to something I didn't see when I edited, great.

If it's not accepted, and it's due to the subjected view of the screener, and I like the shot I'm done. I've came to the point that I don't care enough about having my shots on here to alter something I personally like.

JimThias 04-19-2014 10:05 PM

Good thread. I've now picked up two more excellent photographers to follow on flickr. :-)


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.