RailPictures.Net Forums

RailPictures.Net Forums (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/index.php)
-   Railroad Photography Forum (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   PAQ another time (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/showthread.php?t=18287)

Daniel MINACA 10-13-2019 08:01 PM

PAQ another time
 
Hi all,

just to share the picture, here another PAQ rejection even if mentioned in the comment, only 4 of these cranes have been built for SNCF so it's a rare picture...
Look at today the recent validated shots, some are really PAQ and taken this year... so it is not exceptional shot !
https://www.railpictures.net/viewrej...07&key=9860503
By the way I'm already banned of rejection :razz: :evil:

Daniel SIMON 10-14-2019 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel MINACA (Post 195904)
Hi all,

just to share the picture, here another PAQ rejection even if mentioned in the comment, only 4 of these cranes have been built for SNCF so it's a rare picture...
Look at today the recent validated shots, some are really PAQ and taken this year... so it is not exceptional shot !
https://www.railpictures.net/viewrej...07&key=9860503
By the way I'm already banned of rejection :razz: :evil:

Hi Daniel,

To my opinion, this picture deserves to be added to the database. It shows an interesting piece of historical material.

Bien amicalement,
Daniel

Decapod401 10-14-2019 11:48 AM

I think that the issue is he cut off idler car. Do you have another frame with the entire flat car included?

Daniel MINACA 10-14-2019 12:13 PM

Hi all,

Thanks Daniel !

@Doug: thanks for the reply, yes I have it but subject is the Crane and not the car even if mentioned in the comments... I will retry soon with a larger cropping but I guess that is not the rejection subject !

Joseph Cermak 10-14-2019 01:31 PM

I could maybe see the cut off car being the problem, but it doesn't bother me too much. I would like to see the shot added, its decent documentation of the crane.

Daniel MINACA 10-14-2019 09:19 PM

Thanks for support guys but this is a bad game !
That's clear from screeners choices, they don't wants this kind of material in RPN database !
https://www.railpictures.net/viewrej...30&key=2072432
No comments.

Just an idea: Why RPN members could not vote when a picture is appealed by the author of the rejected picture ?

Just an idea ! :wink:

bigbassloyd 10-14-2019 09:29 PM

Maybe from the other end so the crane is more prominent?

Loyd L.

Daniel MINACA 10-14-2019 09:49 PM

It's enough !
I will not insist anymore.
It's discouraging to propose documents and to write comments !

TedG 10-14-2019 11:13 PM

Thanks for support guys but this is a bad game !
That's clear from screeners choices, they don't wants this kind of material in RPN database !
https://www.railpictures.net/viewrej...30&key=2072432

Daniel,
I certainly didn't have a problem with the first submission, but I agreed with Doug and Joe that the truncated idler car may have been the killer.

Now I'm really at a loss to explain.
/Ted

RobJor 10-14-2019 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigbassloyd (Post 195911)
Maybe from the other end so the crane is more prominent?

Loyd L.

I am good with the photo also, is unusual and provides detail and don't see PAQ:

However, I was curious enough to type in crane and see what has been accepted.

Static roster shots-
Most are somewhat wider view and also as Loyd suggested from the "cab" end or at least wide enough to provide detail along the whole system.

Also submitted in color.

I am also curious why it was submitted in black and white, I suppose to give that 1940's look? but as a roster shot I don't think we are aiming for artistic but rather presenting information and think although the crane is black, a color view is really what it is roster wise in 2007. Maybe a problem with color view??

Anyway when I google this I found mostly photos of models and learned a little about the company. Also I think this is considered a steam rescue crane?

Bob Jordan

Grewup on the CW 10-15-2019 02:00 PM

It is MOW equipment and while some has been accepted, I feel RP just does not want this material/subjects in "their" database regardless how well its documented or presented even though it is just as much a part of railroading as the locos we photograph.


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.