RailPictures.Net Forums

RailPictures.Net Forums (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/index.php)
-   Railroad Photography Forum (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Bad Info Rejection (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/showthread.php?t=17732)

Decapod401 06-12-2016 12:38 PM

Bad Info Rejection
 
I received this rejection for bad info a few days ago:

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...88&key=9545675

I appealed, stating that all info is correct, except the road name, James River Corporation, which is not in the database. The appeal was rejected, with the usual lack of definitive explanation. What am I missing?

EMTRailfan 06-12-2016 12:42 PM

I'm not a rivet counter to be able to know if it is an S2, S6, etc. just by looking at it. If all of the info is correct as you state, did you submit the addition of James River Corporation to the database, or just leave it as 'Untitled'?

Decapod401 06-12-2016 12:46 PM

I just left it untitled. I have done this successfully in the past with no issues.

Joe the Photog 06-12-2016 04:14 PM

Maybe it's the "reporting marks" you have entered? I did just a little research on this motor and can't tell you what marks to put in, but "James River" is not one of them.

miningcamper1 06-12-2016 05:27 PM

Wikipedia and others state this unit was SP 1203. Other rosters have it as 1201. :confused:

Funny that a museum would paint it for a road (GB&W) that did not own an S6.

Extra 127 South 06-12-2016 06:23 PM

I don't know what the reporting marks are, but that is a James River logo on the side of the cab.

Freericks 06-12-2016 06:48 PM

You created your own reporting marks and that's what you got dinged for.

NorthWest 06-12-2016 07:33 PM

The only thing that I can come up with is a 'JROX' for "James River Oil' which may or may not be related to the paper company.

Decapod401 06-13-2016 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miningcamper1 (Post 188644)
Wikipedia and others state this unit was SP 1203. Other rosters have it as 1201. :confused:

Funny that a museum would paint it for a road (GB&W) that did not own an S6.

Sources that I've seen say that the GB&W did own and operate this unit for a few months before leasing it out and eventually selling it to James River a few years later. Apparently, it operated on the GB&W in patched SP paint, so the museum paint scheme and number is completely fictitious, or at least a "what if".

It sounds like my futile search for James River reporting marks has been validated by several of you, and I don't think that James River Corp. and James River Oil are one and the same. I'll resubmit with no reporting marks, and see if that flies. Thanks for your help.

Decapod401 06-16-2016 10:16 PM

I resubmitted the photo yesterday, and left the locomotive number as unknown. It was accepted. Thanks everyone for the help.

[photoid=579993]

Mgoldman 06-17-2016 04:59 AM

It's odd that a photo would be rejected for having the wrong reporting marks yet accepted on routine with symbols not recognized by the database (AT&SF, for instance).

/Mitch


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.