RailPictures.Net Forums

RailPictures.Net Forums (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/index.php)
-   Railroad Photography Forum (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Comp/Rule of 1/3 issue (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/showthread.php?t=17739)

MassArt Images 06-22-2016 08:05 PM

Comp/Rule of 1/3 issue
 
Suggestions please.

1st submission

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...05&key=4596085

2nd submission

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...55&key=5544281

conrail1990 06-22-2016 08:09 PM

Train is too high in the frame.

Mberry 06-22-2016 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by conrail1990 (Post 188680)
Train is too high in the frame.

I agree, would work better with train at bottom of frame; the track curving at left doesn't do anything for me. The other option would be to submit a frame of the train closer to you, on the curve (if you have such a photo).

Noct Foamer 06-22-2016 10:39 PM

I wouldn't have cut off the outside tracks.


Kent in SD

MassArt Images 06-23-2016 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mberry (Post 188681)
I agree, would work better with train at bottom of frame; the track curving at left doesn't do anything for me. The other option would be to submit a frame of the train closer to you, on the curve (if you have such a photo).

I do have that but with the angle of the sun at the time the trucks are in the shadows which I figured would be an instant rejection. I will try a re-crop and move the engine to the lower right of the frame. Should I still try to keep the signal in the photo?

miningcamper1 06-23-2016 01:01 AM

Catch 22: Crop off the right and someone's going to pipe up "Oh, look at all the dead space on the left." :roll:

Dennis A. Livesey 06-23-2016 01:29 AM

1 Attachment(s)
I would agree with Kent about the right track; I think you would have better shot with it with the engine on the left side of the image.

As it is, the attached is my take on the strongest composition. I tried to keep the signal but I couldn't figure out a way.

Attachment 9212

bigbassloyd 06-23-2016 01:41 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Wished you had some more on top to play with, but I'd center the huritage unit, keep the signal, and the hell with what RP wants.

Loyd L.

nikos1 06-23-2016 04:09 AM

I like Loyd's crop, keeping the signal is important and the crop makes good use of the rails as leading lines instead of just foreground distractions.

ATSF666 06-23-2016 04:31 AM

Next they will nail you for over sharpening. Looks like some heatwave action.
:roll:

MassArt Images 06-23-2016 04:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigbassloyd (Post 188686)
Wished you had some more on top to play with, but I'd center the huritage unit, keep the signal, and the hell with what RP wants.

Loyd L.

I got more up top, of the picture that is. Maybe the heritage factor will allow me to be more centered, eh?

MassArt Images 06-23-2016 04:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ATSF666 (Post 188688)
Next they will nail you for over sharpening. Looks like some heatwave action.
:roll:

Definite heatwave action as the temp was around 85F that afternoon.

bigbassloyd 06-23-2016 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MassArt Images (Post 188689)
I got more up top, of the picture that is. Maybe the heritage factor will allow me to be more centered, eh?

All they can do is reject it again if not. :)

Loyd L.

RobJor 06-23-2016 07:02 PM

I guess it can be a trap trying to out guess the screening process, at least start like mentioned with what you prefer. I really like the whole photo, the way the yellow pops etc but it does seem not natural to be so tight on the top. Sometimes I find it good just to start over with a different shot in the sequence to give the screening a "new" look??

Bob

MassArt Images 06-23-2016 09:38 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I am thinking of submitting this re-crop. Hopefully that will be acceptable.

Attachment 9214

JRMDC 06-23-2016 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MassArt Images (Post 188693)
I am thinking of submitting this re-crop. Hopefully that will be acceptable.

My view is your version needs a bit off the right and top.

Decapod401 06-23-2016 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MassArt Images (Post 188693)
I am thinking of submitting this re-crop. Hopefully that will be acceptable.

Attachment 9214

FWIW, I think that's much better. I tried recropping your original submittal, and couldn't come up with something that didn't put the nose in the center of the frame, so I had nothing to suggest beyond what the others had to say. Having more image available to the right gets any dead space on that side, where the signal and box break it up a little.

Decapod401 06-23-2016 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRMDC (Post 188694)
My view is your version needs a bit off the right and top.

Looking at it after submitting my last post, I agree.

MassArt Images 06-23-2016 11:59 PM

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...08&key=8585027

Well I can take a little off the top and right since I can have to correct a sharpness issue. Hey J?... how much do you think I can lop off before I am back to getting a Comp/Rule of 1/3 rejection??

It is a delicate balance when playing Screener Roulette :roll:

JRMDC 06-24-2016 03:40 PM

More! Don't obsess about literal rule of thirds. Rule of thirds is a guideline. The underlying issues are balance and interest. Balance, in that one is looking for a placement that isn't too far "off." Interest, in that for many subjects, centered is not so interesting compared to away from center a bit. Here, you have so little going on right and, to a lesser extent, top, that the right side in particular, beyond the signal, doesn't carry any compositional weight. Dead space, to put it differently, which is a reflection not only of the space itself but of how that space fits with the rest. I would take a little more off the right. The tree trunks at the top, and the line separating the nearby trees from the distant trees, mean the top has a bit more oomph.

But ultimately it is a matter of taste. And, of course, no matter what you do, its high sun. Good luck!

MassArt Images 06-24-2016 06:08 PM

They don't want it. Moving on. Thanks for the insights and suggestions.

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...36&key=7502630

spacetrain1983 06-24-2016 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MassArt Images (Post 188699)
They don't want it. Moving on. Thanks for the insights and suggestions.

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...36&key=7502630

Odd, I've seen many images accepted with heatwave distortion.

MassArt Images 06-26-2016 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mberry (Post 188681)
The other option would be to submit a frame of the train closer to you, on the curve (if you have such a photo).

I was afraid this was gonna happen but I tried anyhow. I explained in the notes that the time was 1720. The screener must just look for rail shadow and that's that. Oh well it was worth a try.

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...92&key=1089736

Mberry 06-26-2016 02:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MassArt Images (Post 188701)
I was afraid this was gonna happen but I tried anyhow. I explained in the notes that the time was 1720. The screener must just look for rail shadow and that's that. Oh well it was worth a try.

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...92&key=1089736

The lighting does look unusually harsh for 1720. Did you recover quite a bit of shadows?

miningcamper1 06-26-2016 02:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MassArt Images (Post 188701)
I was afraid this was gonna happen but I tried anyhow. I explained in the notes that the time was 1720. The screener must just look for rail shadow and that's that. Oh well it was worth a try.

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...92&key=1089736

This shot needs a touch of "candyland" IMO. Especially the VGN yellow that looks pale and overexposed.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.