Go Back   RailPictures.Net Forums > Search Forums

Showing results 1 to 25 of 40
Search took 0.01 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: amtrak07t
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 07-02-2018, 08:07 PM
Replies: 38
Views: 1,533
Posted By amtrak07t
As a software engineer, I can say that what...

As a software engineer, I can say that what you're describing is very simple. Remember when one could view the source of the page views? The functionality of how to acquire the previous page...
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 07-02-2018, 05:56 PM
Replies: 38
Views: 1,533
Posted By amtrak07t
I actually wasn't referring to that one haha. ...

I actually wasn't referring to that one haha. But still, he links to at least a dozen pages. There's plenty of shots of his that made top24 that never would have if it weren't for sharing on FB.
...
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 07-02-2018, 03:13 PM
Replies: 38
Views: 1,533
Posted By amtrak07t
It was mentioned in the site discussion form that...

It was mentioned in the site discussion form that we would see less photos in the top24 from "a certain user". Now that the user is under a new id, he's back and linking to his photos.

I think...
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 04-26-2018, 03:56 AM
Replies: 22
Views: 1,689
Posted By amtrak07t
There's a way to incorporate the crews and their...

There's a way to incorporate the crews and their equipment into a photo in a way that's not distracting.

You can argue that the poles that you did remove from the photo are part of the...
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 04-23-2018, 01:36 AM
Replies: 22
Views: 1,689
Posted By amtrak07t
This is the pole. I still don't think any of...

This is the pole. I still don't think any of them were concerning, but of the poles, this one stuck out to me the most.

I really think it's the bags. They'd be harder to remove.
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 04-23-2018, 01:03 AM
Replies: 22
Views: 1,689
Posted By amtrak07t
I don't think it's even the poles (that was...

I don't think it's even the poles (that was cloned out) that are the problem. Typically, poles and wires are fine as long as they don't obstruct the lead locomotive. The two that were removed...
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 03-27-2018, 03:12 AM
Replies: 21
Views: 2,180
Posted By amtrak07t
I didn't intend to put it there in the first...

I didn't intend to put it there in the first place (or notice it for that matter). Occasionally, I will do local adjustments if something is totally out of whack. I have the default brush set to...
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 03-26-2018, 05:13 AM
Replies: 36
Views: 2,433
Posted By amtrak07t
I see that both images were taken on the same...

I see that both images were taken on the same day. Still, they were submitted over a year apart, and I think it's worthwhile to have a second look at a different angle. I still think that both have...
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 03-26-2018, 03:06 AM
Replies: 21
Views: 2,180
Posted By amtrak07t
http://forums.railpictures.net/attachment.php?atta...

http://forums.railpictures.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=9597&stc=1&d=1522033530

Just for future reference, here's the first version (for those who are just now viewing the forum).
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 03-26-2018, 02:46 AM
Replies: 21
Views: 2,180
Posted By amtrak07t
Thank you, Chris! Done.

Thank you, Chris! Done.
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 03-26-2018, 02:45 AM
Replies: 21
Views: 2,180
Posted By amtrak07t
Fixed that in the re-submission (give it a little...

Fixed that in the re-submission (give it a little bit). Thanks for catching that. That was an errant radial filter that I didn't delete.
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 03-25-2018, 10:05 PM
Replies: 36
Views: 2,433
Posted By amtrak07t
It appears that this image was published over a...

It appears that this image was published over a year ago, [photoid=605485]
I couldn't imagine the screeners have that good of a memory unless the older image got a top shot. I'd say it is worth...
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 03-25-2018, 08:07 PM
Replies: 21
Views: 2,180
Posted By amtrak07t
Reuploaded! Is it any better? Weird thing is,...

Reuploaded! Is it any better? Weird thing is, they resized it to 1200 x 800. The image that I uploaded was 1600 x something.
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 03-25-2018, 08:05 PM
Replies: 21
Views: 2,180
Posted By amtrak07t
Eeek! Thanks for pointing that out. I never had...

Eeek! Thanks for pointing that out. I never had that problem before. I see that a lot of my images from the last week have dust with an aperture of f/8 and smaller. I resubmitted the photo after...
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 03-17-2018, 02:31 PM
Replies: 10
Views: 1,610
Posted By amtrak07t
I'm not sure I understand your comment about a...

I'm not sure I understand your comment about a second tripod. You really shouldn't need one to shoot still of trains.
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 02-27-2018, 04:59 PM
Replies: 9
Views: 1,169
Posted By amtrak07t
Oh, and I'd be content if it was rejected. I...

Oh, and I'd be content if it was rejected. I just thought it was kind of strange to see no reason listed��
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 02-27-2018, 04:57 PM
Replies: 9
Views: 1,169
Posted By amtrak07t
It was one of those pictures that I found a few...

It was one of those pictures that I found a few minutes before 1am (I guess 12AM for Railpictures local time) and thought I'd just send it just to do it.

I decided to appeal it just to say "hey,...
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 02-27-2018, 04:57 AM
Replies: 9
Views: 1,169
Posted By amtrak07t
I attached a picture here.

I attached a picture here.
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 02-27-2018, 04:56 AM
Replies: 9
Views: 1,169
Posted By amtrak07t
http://forums.railpictures.net/attachment.php?atta...

http://forums.railpictures.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=9573&stc=1&d=1519710947
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 02-27-2018, 04:50 AM
Replies: 9
Views: 1,169
Posted By amtrak07t
This image is so bad that it doesn't even get a reason for rejection

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=1639645&key=1387110

I suppose the screener forgot to check the cloudy day / common angle box...or a site glitch.

I've never seen this happen...
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 02-27-2018, 04:48 AM
Replies: 8
Views: 1,053
Posted By amtrak07t
Try cropping an inch or two from the bottom. I...

Try cropping an inch or two from the bottom. I like the shot, but the train is centered vertically.
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 02-10-2018, 05:23 AM
Replies: 44
Views: 9,515
Posted By amtrak07t
I mean, I personally don't like it, but hey, the...

I mean, I personally don't like it, but hey, the Screeners did and plenty of other people did, and that's what matters.
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 02-09-2018, 01:28 AM
Replies: 44
Views: 9,515
Posted By amtrak07t
Ah, I'm sorry. I must have quoted it wrong. ( I...

Ah, I'm sorry. I must have quoted it wrong. ( I thought I did it right, but I guess I was wrong :lol:)
I was referring to [photoid=646013]
I think the PCAs may be slightly campaigned for:lol:
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 02-07-2018, 05:39 AM
Replies: 44
Views: 9,515
Posted By amtrak07t
He has 4 PCAs from the same area and three are...

He has 4 PCAs from the same area and three are from the same spot. That repetition is impressive.
Forum: Railroad Photography Forum 02-03-2018, 01:53 AM
Replies: 44
Views: 9,515
Posted By amtrak07t
Ahh, you beat me to it. I agree completely. The...

Ahh, you beat me to it. I agree completely. The first image is composed better, and I think he should have been awarded a SC before the second one did.
Showing results 1 to 25 of 40

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.