View Single Post
Old 10-02-2008, 08:41 AM   #4
BryanJones
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jnohallman
Anyone have any experience with this particular lens? Any comments about the image quality? I know it's not an L lens, but it seems like a very useful range. Just curious . . .

Jon
The Canon 28-105 F3.5-4.5 II USM is not a bad lens. At about $230 brand new this is one of the best bargains Canon offers as far as image quality goes. I've been using one for a few years now, usually one one of my film cameras but have also used it quite a bit on the 10D and 30D digital bodies. Wide open the image quality is pretty good, stop down to F5.6 and it gets even better. Its almost as good as my 24-105L F4 IS lens but at a faction of the cost. Its very light weight and fairly compact as well. It works well as a general purpose or walk around lens, though depending on your shooting style or particular location there may still be times you want to go a little wider. Overall its a great lens for the money.

Bryan Jones
Brooks,KY
BryanJones is offline   Reply With Quote