View Single Post
Old 02-05-2011, 09:29 PM   #20
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 16

Whilst the OP's shot was rightly rejected for obstructing objects, the inclusion of half-naked women is a cynical attempt to get hits and frankly, I don't really care how much effort it took to obtain the image. It's attainment that counts. I could bleat on about how much effort it took to take a cloudy 3/4 but does anyone really care? I tend to side with coaststarlight14 on this one. If I want to see shots of trains, then I'll go to For hot, naked women, I can either look at the missus, or if she's got a 'headache', there are a plethora of other sites on the web. Maybe it's the mixture of trains and woman that specifically get some 'going' on here and may explain why these shots get so many hits? Maybe there's a niche market for such 'specialist' images or maybe those people need to get out more?

Jim - An emoticon response? The last domicile of the illiterate? Really?
JezG is offline   Reply With Quote