View Single Post
Old 05-06-2008, 02:18 AM   #8
JRMDC
Senior Member
 
JRMDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by milwman
I think it was the time of day and was open up a lot, so the field of focus was short. Looks sharp at the hand rails
The EXIF is corrupted, so I don't know what Bill was using. If it was a Canon crop-sensor body and a 200mm at f/4, focused at 200 feet, the depth of field is 47 feet. If it is a 300mm, f/4, and 500 feet, depth of field is 160 feet. At telephoto, field of focus just isn't that short.

http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html

It's decently sharp, it fits my personal range of sharpness, especially given the composition with the heat waves and the sunset mood, but I don't think it meets RP's criteria.

Here's tele sharp, 300mm or maybe 400, just up the line at Weverton:
Image © Daniel Putz
PhotoID: 177864
Photograph © Daniel Putz
__________________
My RP pix are here.
My Flickr pix are here.

My commentaries on rail pictures are in my blog.

RP Photo Albums:
Cabooses
Engine Details
Farm and Train
Plumes!
Railroad Details
Signal Details
Switchstand Shots

Last edited by JRMDC; 05-06-2008 at 02:22 AM.
JRMDC is offline   Reply With Quote