Old 12-30-2011, 02:57 AM   #1
Northern Limits
Senior Member
 
Northern Limits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 623
Default New LED monitor = underexposure

How does this look on your monitor? I've set my new one as best I could, but still not sure about it.
This reject for underexposed looks O.K to me. The snow is bright white.
Opinions on brightness and color please.

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...&key=270862118
__________________
Cheers, Jim.


Click Here to view my photos at RailPictures.Net!
Northern Limits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2011, 03:01 AM   #2
PLEzero
Senior Member
 
PLEzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pittsburgh,PA
Posts: 674
Default

Looks underexposed here.
__________________
Brad Morocco
Candyland, PA
My Flickr Photos
My RP.net Photos

Join the Pittsburgh Rails Yahoo group!
PLEzero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2011, 03:12 AM   #3
CN Railfan
Senior Member
 
CN Railfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 154
Default

The CP red is quite dull in that frame.
CN Railfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2011, 03:35 AM   #4
Northern Limits
Senior Member
 
Northern Limits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 623
Default

Thanks - I'll try adjusting the shadows and brightness and see what happens.
__________________
Cheers, Jim.


Click Here to view my photos at RailPictures.Net!
Northern Limits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2011, 12:52 PM   #5
JimThias
Senior Member
 
JimThias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 7,998
Default

Poor image quality, soft, or something...the nose of the loco looks poor.
JimThias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2011, 04:46 PM   #6
Northern Limits
Senior Member
 
Northern Limits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimThias View Post
Poor image quality, soft, or something...the nose of the loco looks poor.
Yes that too!
I should have listened to my own instincts. The original plan was not to submit it at all.

Any comments on this one? http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...d=999396&key=0

I think I need to try recalibrating my monitor.
__________________
Cheers, Jim.


Click Here to view my photos at RailPictures.Net!
Northern Limits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2011, 07:28 PM   #7
CN Railfan
Senior Member
 
CN Railfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 154
Default

Just saw the first one got on. Nice job.
CN Railfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2011, 03:23 PM   #8
Northern Limits
Senior Member
 
Northern Limits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 623
Default

So I recalibrated my monitor and started from scratch because of the image quality issues Jim mentioned (I think I kept tweaking the contrast, which killed the first attempt).
Image © Jim Dorst
PhotoID: 385359
Photograph © Jim Dorst


And did a b&w of the other rejected picture to get rid of the effect of the conflicting light sources.
Image © Jim Dorst
PhotoID: 385450
Photograph © Jim Dorst
__________________
Cheers, Jim.


Click Here to view my photos at RailPictures.Net!
Northern Limits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2011, 04:05 PM   #9
JRMDC
Senior Member
 
JRMDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,894
Default

Nice, Jim, you fixed the PIQ issues, and now, as a special wreck shot in pretty snow, is already ToL24!
__________________
My RP pix are here.
My Flickr pix are here.

My commentaries on rail pictures are in my blog.

RP Photo Albums:
Cabooses
Engine Details
Farm and Train
Plumes!
Railroad Details
Signal Details
Switchstand Shots
JRMDC is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.