Old 08-06-2008, 03:31 AM   #1
Bryan Oliver
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 41
Default High Sun?

I had this shot rejected for high sun -
I took this shot at around 7:00pm. How could it possibly be high sun at that time of day? I appealed, but was rejected again for the same thing with no other information given. Any thoughts?
Bryan Oliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 03:33 AM   #2
Chicago Railfan
Senior Member
Chicago Railfan's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Chi-Town subarbs
Posts: 224
Send a message via AIM to Chicago Railfan Send a message via Yahoo to Chicago Railfan

The axles are in shadow. If you focused directly on the nose of the engine, and not so much the body if wouldn't be considered a high sun shot. I like the picture though, I think the colors and lighting are pretty good.
Chicago Railfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 03:42 AM   #3
Senior Member
KevinM's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,102

I wouldn't take the "high sun" rejection too literally. We've all come to know they really mean they just don't like the way the subject is lit....and high sun is just one way that can happen. Unfortunately, the Screeners don't have a reject button for every nuance related to lighting, so "high sun" becomes the default.

I concur with my friend from Chicago. The subject is lit directly on the nose and the sides are in shadow. If you had shot this more nose-on, I think it would have a better chance.

My RP stuff is here.

Link to my Flickr Albums. Albums from Steam Railroads all over the US.
KevinM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 03:47 AM   #4
Senior Member
JRMDC's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202

Agree with the above; I just want to add that you have pretty strong oversharpening artifacts around the various wires.
My RP pix are here.
My Flickr pix are here.

My commentaries on rail pictures are in my blog.

RP Photo Albums:
Engine Details
Farm and Train
Railroad Details
Signal Details
Switchstand Shots
JRMDC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 03:48 AM   #5
Senior Member
cblaz's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Marlboro, New Jersey
Posts: 1,007

Kevin hit the nail on the head. While the rejection reads: "Poor Lighting: High Sun," it should read: "Poor Lighting: Nose-Lit (When only the nose of the train is lit, three quarter shots will not work.)"

- Chris
cblaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 05:33 AM   #6
Dennis A. Livesey
Senior Member
Dennis A. Livesey's Avatar
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,986

Wedgies of common power have to be perfect to get in. The nose light, shadowed trucks is correct. But even more, the great amount of clutter forcing my eye all over the place; and not in fun ways.

I Foam Therefore I Am.

My pix on RailPics:

I am on Flickr as well:

"Dennis is such a God, he could do that with a camera obscura and some homemade acetate." Holloran Grade

"To me it looks drawn in in Paintshop. It looks like a puddle of orange on the sky." SFO777
Dennis A. Livesey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 11:57 AM   #7
I shoot what I like
milwman's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cedar Fall's, Iowa
Posts: 2,474
Send a message via Yahoo to milwman

Close but no banana, You see what there saying in the shot im sure. Its not a bad shot, BUT. What would work here if reshot backing up and moving over to the right, Gets rid of the lack of side light and hides some of the crap thats blocking the sides of the power to. just something to think about. We all had shots come out like this by not seeing where the Light may fall on the trains or power.
Richard Scott Marsh I go by Scott long story

milwman is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.