Old 09-19-2008, 01:44 PM   #1
Senior Member
EMTRailfan's Avatar
Join Date: May 2007
Location: I can be found railfanning the abandoned B&O Northern Sub.
Posts: 1,449
Default USM help???

Why is it that when I use Unsharp Mask, my shots get a watery/painted appearance? The settings that I use are the typical 5/.5/0. I've had a few 'Operprocessed-too much grain removal gives a painted appearance' rejectioins lately, and thought this may have been the cause, and not the grain removal. When I do use the grain removal, it is used very minutely.
Here's an example. The one on the left is the USM version, and on the right is the just straight sharpening at 50 version, which was accepted into the DB today. It's hard to see it in those small of files, but it is a lot worse in the RP upload sizes.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Using USM.jpg
Views:	102
Size:	265.1 KB
ID:	3352   Click image for larger version

Name:	Using sharpening at 50.jpg
Views:	115
Size:	226.1 KB
ID:	3353  
A Picture Is Worth 1000 Words. A Memory Is Worth 1000 Pictures.

Last edited by EMTRailfan; 09-19-2008 at 01:47 PM.
EMTRailfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2008, 02:05 PM   #2
American Gunzel
ottergoose's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 1,626
Send a message via AIM to ottergoose Send a message via Yahoo to ottergoose

With a resolution of 8 MP on the Rebel XT, I usually use Canon Digital Photo Professional to bump up the sharpness to 1-3, export to TIFF, rotate/level, do a run of USM at 0.75 / 50 / 5 at the original resolution, and then again at 0.75 / 25 / 5 after resizing image.

The "best" settings vary from camera to camera, and are mainly a function of resolution, I think.
Nick Benson | Pictures | Website | Flickr | Profile | JetPhotos | Twitter
ottergoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2008, 09:10 PM   #3
LSRC Railfan
Senior Member
LSRC Railfan's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 274

I too use a Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT. I open my files, save as a TIF, import in photoshop. Then after I do color changes, shadow/highlight work, crop, etc. I sharpen my photos at 100/.7/0. Then I resize to whatever I need it to be. Before saving I do one final round of sharpening, usual at 40 or 50/.5/0. Seems to work good for me, but check my work to judge for yourself.
LSRC Railfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2008, 11:59 PM   #4
Senior Member
JRMDC's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,196

There certainly are a lot of different values being stated here! I have to wonder if some are typos or some are non-PS software.

There is 5/.5/0, which in PS will basically do nothing (50/.5/0 will do, although on the weak side at least for my shots). There is .75/25-50/0 which I have no idea what it does. There is 100/.7/0 which is what I am used to seeing.
My RP pix are here.
My Flickr pix are here.

My commentaries on rail pictures are in my blog.

RP Photo Albums:
Engine Details
Farm and Train
Railroad Details
Signal Details
Switchstand Shots
JRMDC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2008, 12:20 AM   #5
Rich K
Senior Member
Rich K's Avatar
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 258

I sharpen pretty much all my shots these days using the LAB color technique described in the tutorial here . . .


Works like a charm using Photoshop CS3.
Rich K

Webmaster of The Railfan Gallery

Click Here to view my photos at RailPictures.net
Rich K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2008, 03:26 AM   #6
Watain's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hiltons, Virginia, USA
Posts: 953
Send a message via MSN to Watain

I just use the sharpening tool in Elements, I like the idea of being able to sharpen what you want, instead of the entire picture.
Watain is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.