05-30-2014, 02:01 AM
|
#27
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 602
|
Surprised about what? That he is a god?
He would not present a dark side 3/4 wedge as art unless it really was art.
__________________
-Brent Kneebush
Defiance, Ohio
|
|
|
05-30-2014, 02:09 AM
|
#28
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnumForce
Oh and just to bug you.
 | PhotoID: 406686 Photograph © Brent Kneebush |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnumForce
 | PhotoID: 407320 Photograph © Wyatt M. Heilman |
|
I like how the yellow matches so well in both shots.
|
|
|
05-30-2014, 03:27 AM
|
#29
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Montreal, Qc
Posts: 655
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimThias
I like how the yellow matches so well in both shots.

|
Yeah, that happens:
My shot:
 | PhotoID: 469272 Photograph © Michael Berry |
Nicolas Houde's shot a minute later:
 | PhotoID: 469192 Photograph © Nicolas Houde |
|
|
|
05-30-2014, 03:55 AM
|
#30
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 602
|
Nevermind, disregard
__________________
-Brent Kneebush
Defiance, Ohio
Last edited by MagnumForce; 05-30-2014 at 04:07 AM.
|
|
|
05-30-2014, 04:35 AM
|
#31
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,861
|
pwned:
 | PhotoID: 483109 Photograph © Chris Paulhamus |
And not banned...
|
|
|
05-31-2014, 07:24 AM
|
#32
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 1,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnumForce
Surprised about what? That he is a god?
He would not present a dark side 3/4 wedge as art unless it really was art.
|
You do realize all photographs are art...
__________________
I personally have had a problem with those trying to tell us to turn railroad photography into an "art form." It's fine for them to do so, I welcome it in fact, but what I do have a problem with is that the practitioners of the more "arty" shots, I have found, tend to look down their nose's at others who are shooting more "mundane" shots.
Railroad photography is what you make of it, but one way is not "better" than another, IMHO. Unless you have a pole right thought the nose of the engine! -SG
|
|
|
05-31-2014, 07:20 PM
|
#33
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 602
|
Sure they are...
__________________
-Brent Kneebush
Defiance, Ohio
|
|
|
05-31-2014, 11:09 PM
|
#34
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,333
|
Been offline a couple days, why did they ban him?
|
|
|
06-01-2014, 04:24 AM
|
#35
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ellwood City, PA
Posts: 61
|
I can't believe it took that long.
|
|
|
06-01-2014, 05:04 AM
|
#36
|
We Own The Night...
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Centreville, VA
Posts: 799
|
I don't subscribe to the belief that there are "rules" for railroad photography. Frankly, I've never heard something so asinine in my life.
There are "best practices" and "guidelines" but I have yet to come across a single person who says, "You MUST shoot this way, or else." Brent, I know what you mean, but it comes off sounding a little draconian. My biggest gripe with RP.net in its formative years was the seemingly rigid "standards" they set with very little wiggle room. Fortunately, as the years have gone on, the screeners have matured in their views to a certain extent and do look at photos with a bit more of an open mind than they did even 5 years ago. Is there room to grow? You betcha, but I've pretty much given up on them listening to my suggestions.
Just because a handful of guys made themselves an identity in railroad photography or art does not mean they wrote the bible that everyone has to abide by. "Art" in the case of railroad photography is a means of expression about how one sees a scene or a moment in time.
Unfortunately, many people have a very skewed sense of "expression" while others simply cannot bring themselves to see another person's photo the way the photographer did and that is what makes photography (and art) of any kind highly subjective.
I would wager that about 90% of the photos on RP.net are tremendously "un-exciting" and completely mundane. Many of the photos I see on RP.net barely evoke a yawn in most cases. Once in a while though, you see that picture that you think, "Damn, that's pretty badass, wish I'd have thought of that."
Strangely enough, it's the photos that pushed the envelope and in most cases went completely against the so-called "rules" that are among the best photos out there. If you're following rules, you're a conformist, not an artist.
Last edited by hoydie17; 06-01-2014 at 05:07 AM.
|
|
|
06-01-2014, 08:25 PM
|
#37
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 602
|
I think we have shown with the last few photos posted that rules are meant to be broken, but when you are shooting nothing more than a basic wedge shot which is what started this, then the rules matter a whole lot.
But this wedge shots should not be allowed that so many people profess because it gives a sameness to most shots needs to stop. There is a place in railroad photography, albeit an unexciting one, for a basic, well composed, light at your back 3/4 wedge.
__________________
-Brent Kneebush
Defiance, Ohio
|
|
|
06-01-2014, 09:57 PM
|
#38
|
We Own The Night...
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Centreville, VA
Posts: 799
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnumForce
I think we have shown with the last few photos posted that rules are meant to be broken, but when you are shooting nothing more than a basic wedge shot which is what started this, then the rules matter a whole lot.
But this wedge shots should not be allowed that so many people profess because it gives a sameness to most shots needs to stop. There is a place in railroad photography, albeit an unexciting one, for a basic, well composed, light at your back 3/4 wedge.
|
Truthfully, the vast majority of train photos are 3/4 wedgies... night, day, pouring down rain or nasty fog. Because even a single locomotive tends to be longer than it is tall, they naturally lend themselves to the wedgie composition. The only offset for that is if you're above the train, or at a great distance from it, then the wedge isn't always ideal.
I suppose my point of view is that one should consider that they don't need to have a portfolio on RP.net with 125 wedgies from the same grade crossing or station platform. Great job (insert name here), you nailed a nice morning sunlight shot at (insert location here)... pick one or maybe two of your favorites and post those to RP. It's like a moth attracted to light with some people though, as if they can't get a high enough image count on the site.
Really what I'm saying is, people shouldn't make the screeners do what they should do for themselves. Be selective about their own work and only upload their best stuff, not everything that meets RP's rather basic requirements.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:19 AM.
|