02-23-2014, 02:54 AM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA area
Posts: 729
|
My usual...Bad Cropping
This was hit with a BC
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...20&key=1791993
Here is the original.... Help Please
__________________
Carl
My RP pics are HERE
My website is HERE
Last edited by MassArt Images; 02-23-2014 at 10:37 AM.
|
|
|
02-23-2014, 03:02 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,674
|
I like it - I don't think it's a bad crop, but I don't think personally I'm a fan of the engine way back in the shot as the signals almost look like obstructions. I'd think it could slip right in if you had a shot with the engines between the signals. Processing is a bit but not out of hand. Make the shadows look more like shadows - darker, or at least black and not blue.
/Mitch
|
|
|
02-23-2014, 03:57 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
All the action is on the left - crop right as much as you can, and sky. My reaction to the processing is stronger than Mitch's - shadows tool well overdone.
|
|
|
02-23-2014, 04:24 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,674
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMDC
All the action is on the left - crop right as much as you can, and sky. My reaction to the processing is stronger than Mitch's - shadows tool well overdone.
|
Then you cut the train consist un-naturally. I like the "big expanse" as cropped, though smushed would be more in line with what we see on RP.
As is, in the panno crop, I think it works.
/Mitch
|
|
|
02-23-2014, 04:39 AM
|
#5
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,333
|
Take a good hunk off the right
|
|
|
02-23-2014, 05:10 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mgoldman
Then you cut the train consist un-naturally. I like the "big expanse" as cropped, though smushed would be more in line with what we see on RP.
As is, in the panno crop, I think it works.
/Mitch
|
One can easily do a substantial crop on the right and leave a natural cut. Look again.
|
|
|
02-23-2014, 05:16 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,268
|
Do you have a frame with the engine past the signals?
|
|
|
02-23-2014, 05:40 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 794
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSX1702
Do you have a frame with the engine past the signals?
|
Then it would get hit with "backlit", which is why he appears to have tried to lighten the near side of the train making its shadow appear blue as opposed to the black shadows of the signals.
I actually prefer the full version showing the full contour of the hill in the background and the road at the left, I get a better feel of the place that way. Maybe cut off a bit of the road, but leave the majority of it in place and a sliver off the bottom to keep the ratio..
__________________
Click Here to view my photos at RailPictures.Net!
Last edited by wds; 02-23-2014 at 05:44 PM.
|
|
|
02-23-2014, 06:12 PM
|
#9
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,333
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wds
Then it would get hit with "backlit", which is why he appears to have tried to lighten the near side of the train making its shadow appear blue as opposed to the black shadows of the signals.
I actually prefer the full version showing the full contour of the hill in the background and the road at the left, I get a better feel of the place that way. Maybe cut off a bit of the road, but leave the majority of it in place and a sliver off the bottom to keep the ratio..
|
Yea, you can see he's alreay hit it pretty hard with the shadows and highlights tool... those shadows look pretty unnatural
That looks like a great location with lots of possibilities. If you live nearby, try again at a time with better lighting?
Last edited by troy12n; 02-23-2014 at 06:15 PM.
|
|
|
02-24-2014, 01:37 AM
|
#10
|
Part-Time Railfan
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,381
|
I like the composition. too much shadow recovery tool.
|
|
|
02-24-2014, 02:03 AM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA area
Posts: 729
|
I stepped away from the shadow/highlight tool. I recropped by taking some off the top and right. All to no avail. I now have a backlit rejection. End of the road.
__________________
Carl
My RP pics are HERE
My website is HERE
Last edited by MassArt Images; 02-24-2014 at 02:14 AM.
|
|
|
02-24-2014, 02:24 AM
|
#12
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,333
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MassArt Images
I stepped away from the shadow/highlight tool. I recropped by taking some off the top and right. All to no avail. I now have a backlit rejection. End of the road.
Attachment 8460
|
There's been a bunch lately truly backlit much more than yours, dont you love the consistency?
|
|
|
02-24-2014, 03:17 AM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troy12n
There's been a bunch lately truly backlit much more than yours, dont you love the consistency?
|
Yeah, easily 80% of the train in his shot is lit perfectly. Just because there's a fraction of shadowed side showing, it shouldn't be rejected for backlit. However...I would have hit it for "subject too far away."
|
|
|
02-24-2014, 12:27 PM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA area
Posts: 729
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimThias
However...I would have hit it for "subject too far away."
|
Then I guess you would have hit these too.....
 | PhotoID: 470522 Photograph © Mike Danneman |
 | PhotoID: 467628 Photograph © Alex Soeun |
__________________
Carl
My RP pics are HERE
My website is HERE
Last edited by MassArt Images; 02-24-2014 at 12:32 PM.
|
|
|
02-24-2014, 12:36 PM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
Nope. Those photos are showing big scenes, where as yours has two detached subjects in it. Which are we supposed to be focusing on, the signals or the train? Where is your frame with the locos between the signals? That is what makes it "too far away" for me. The two subjects are detached from each and I think it would be a much stronger image if they were together, especially with the elevation you have. If you were track level, then I might see it differently. But that's just how my brain and eyes work.
Last edited by JimThias; 02-24-2014 at 12:39 PM.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:45 AM.
|