Old 03-22-2004, 08:58 PM   #1
VRE Man
Member
 
VRE Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Manassas, Va
Posts: 50
Send a message via MSN to VRE Man Send a message via Yahoo to VRE Man
Default I'm trying to Understand this?

Photo ID 42973 was rejected from the database.
Railroad: Amtrak
Locomotive: GE P42DC

Reason for Rejection: bad cropping - train should fill more of the frame
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=42973

This just does not make any sense, I among others have many photos that have much less frame fill so I am stumped on this one.


Also,

Railroad: CSX Transportation (CSXT)
Locomotive: EMD SD70M
Reason for Rejection: we are not in need of any more marginally lit CSX wedge shots

This I could go into a long drawn out rebuttle about this rejection. I'm not mad about the rejection it is the comments attached that concern me. The latest batch of photos I had uploaded where really the BEST I had shot since last October IMPO at Featherstone (Same Location). Up close, Really up close for that matter, Lighting was hard with 50 mph winds and clouds. But it was not the light I was concerned with it was the detail.

Anyways I'm just trying to get this straight?
__________________
Click Here to view my photos at RailPictures.Net!


Click Here to view my aircraft photos at JetPhotos.Net!
VRE Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2004, 11:26 PM   #2
dsktc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 268
Default

Hi, Jason.

All of us have had photos rejected by
the screeners, so don't take it personally.

The Amtrak photo would have benefited
from cropping a quarter of the image from the bottom.

Dave
__________________
Dave Kerr
dsktc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2004, 02:05 AM   #3
Chris Starnes
Administrator
 
Chris Starnes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 927
Default

I wouldn't worry so much about the detail of the engine unless it was a pure roster shot. Most of us know all to well what the standard CSX road engine looks like.

Fine a scenic spot, plan a shot (lighting and direction of the train), then go execute and try to avoid the standard 'here comes the train down the tracks' shot. I think you will find your results will be much better.

CTS
__________________
Chris Starnes
Co-Editor, RailPictures.net
Chris Starnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2004, 05:19 PM   #4
oltmannd
Senior Member
 
oltmannd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 361
Default

I think what they're trying to say is the train isn't centered in the shot. There is more space between the front of the train and the right hand edge than there is from the rear to the left hand edge. It doesn't help that what's shown between the train and the right edge looks junky and distracting.

Did you consider shooting this with a "normal" lens? The thing that makes the Auto train unique is that it is LOOOONNNG! The tele shot make the train look short. A normal lens would have accentuated the length.

-Don
oltmannd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2004, 11:17 PM   #5
Save The Wave
trainchaser.us
 
Save The Wave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Evansville IN
Posts: 357
Send a message via MSN to Save The Wave
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oltmannd
I think what they're trying to say is the train isn't centered in the shot. There is more space between the front of the train and the right hand edge than there is from the rear to the left hand edge. It doesn't help that what's shown between the train and the right edge looks junky and distracting.

-Don
Then explain how this one got accepted (no offense meant to the photgrapher)

http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=54740
Save The Wave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2004, 11:43 PM   #6
Ween
Senior Member
 
Ween's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,861
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Save The Wave
Quote:
Originally Posted by oltmannd
I think what they're trying to say is the train isn't centered in the shot. There is more space between the front of the train and the right hand edge than there is from the rear to the left hand edge. It doesn't help that what's shown between the train and the right edge looks junky and distracting.

-Don
Then explain how this one got accepted (no offense meant to the photgrapher)

http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=54740
Yeah, I wondered about this one too. Not because of bad cropping, but because it's partially obscured. I've had several rejected for "foreground clutter," but it was usually for a wire or weeds, but this is far more obscuring. Either way, it's not my call...I just snap 'em and submit 'em...
__________________
Ween is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2004, 12:38 AM   #7
Chris Starnes
Administrator
 
Chris Starnes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 927
Default

Interesting question.....

Sometimes it is easy to hit the accept option when you mean to hit the reject

CTS
__________________
Chris Starnes
Co-Editor, RailPictures.net
Chris Starnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2004, 01:20 AM   #8
urslow
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 48
Send a message via MSN to urslow
Default

Boy I'd like to have the reject / accept button in my hands for a day or two. Can you buy them at Radio Shack?
urslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2004, 11:45 AM   #9
oltmannd
Senior Member
 
oltmannd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Save The Wave
Quote:
Originally Posted by oltmannd
I think what they're trying to say is the train isn't centered in the shot. There is more space between the front of the train and the right hand edge than there is from the rear to the left hand edge. It doesn't help that what's shown between the train and the right edge looks junky and distracting.

-Don
Then explain how this one got accepted (no offense meant to the photgrapher)

http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=54740
That's easy. It's a roster shot of rare optic orange wheels stops. The locomotive is just part of the backdrop!

There definetely is a lack of consistency in the screening, but given how the owners have set the system up, I don't think its unreasonably so. It's always going to carry the individual biases of each screener and be a very subjective process. I'm sure if we could think of some suggestiong that would improve the process w/o it taking more of their time, they'd consider them.

-Don
oltmannd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2004, 01:09 PM   #10
Chris Starnes
Administrator
 
Chris Starnes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 927
Default

Quote:
I'm sure if we could think of some suggestiong that would improve the process w/o it taking more of their time, they'd consider them.
We are more than willing to hear some suggestions......anybody?
__________________
Chris Starnes
Co-Editor, RailPictures.net
Chris Starnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2004, 04:28 PM   #11
ddavies
Senior Member
 
ddavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 381
Default

Since it has been 5 days, I can not see the image that Jason is talking about, but as I look at the image he has under his name, I can see what his problem is.

The tendancy of a lot of people is to shoot with the object of interest is the middle of the picture. From any photo course, you will learn the rule of thirds. Divide the image by thirds both horizontal and vertical. Your object of interest should fall along one of those lines. For most impact, it should fall at an intersection.

In Jason's picture, the Conrail unit falls in the middle. To make this image better, crop out some of the dead space to the left of the engine and the ballast below, until the Conrail unit falls on the intersection of the first line from the left, and the first line (third) from the bottom.

Unlike a slide, where you are trapped with what you shot, once you have a digital image, use a photo editing program to improve your image.

Chris, maybe you guys need to give some lessons (like I just did), rather than have comments that a non-photographer does may not understand. And you may need some retired professional photographers as screeners ... hint ...
ddavies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2004, 02:42 AM   #12
Ween
Senior Member
 
Ween's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,861
Default

Quote:
Chris, maybe you guys need to give some lessons (like I just did), rather than have comments that a non-photographer does may not understand. And you may need some retired professional photographers as screeners ... hint ...
Thanks for the info on thirds. Good stuff. But I disagree with having someone with a professional eye with a history of professional photography screening pictures. I fear the focus of the site would move away from submitting photos "enjoyable to other rail enthusiasts" to one more along the lines of "well, your subject was too far left and not at an intersecting point with the horizon." In other words, moving away from subject and more to method.

Just a thought from someone who likes the picture for what's in it, not the angles behind it...
__________________
Ween is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2004, 11:23 AM   #13
ddavies
Senior Member
 
ddavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 381
Default

Duh ... I am trying to raise the level of all railfan photography. If you don't know what makes a good picture, how can you help anyone improve and lessen all the griping about rejected photos?
ddavies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2004, 04:01 PM   #14
Curtis Wininger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Blacksburg, VA/Gate City, VA
Posts: 120
Send a message via ICQ to Curtis Wininger Send a message via AIM to Curtis Wininger Send a message via MSN to Curtis Wininger
Default

The subject at hand is a photo what was not positioned well in the frame. Dave made a good point about how to fix that.
__________________
------------
Curtis Wininger
RailPictures.net Photo Screener
Curtis Wininger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2004, 06:48 AM   #15
clearnorth
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default

Why not just let all pictures of acceptable railroad subject be viewed in a temporary category, then let your viewers decide by popularity which photos are acceptable to them and which are not. After all, without your viewers, you wouldn't have a website.
clearnorth is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.