01-19-2014, 07:02 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA area
Posts: 729
|
Horizon un-level
I will correct the exposure. Even then I don't know if it will be acceptable, however the the unlevel ding has me stumped. What am I missing and which way should I go? Suggestions on rotation??
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...51&key=4316145
Thanks!
__________________
Carl
My RP pics are HERE
My website is HERE
|
|
|
01-19-2014, 07:48 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 799
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MassArt Images
|
maybe try leveling it with the 4th street light from the left, so a little cc
|
|
|
01-19-2014, 10:01 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
Too bad you couldn't have taken a few steps back and slightly to the right. Definitely needs some exposure work too. And I think they'd like you to go CCW just a tad.
|
|
|
01-20-2014, 01:11 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA area
Posts: 729
|
I guess the level issue is fixed but now underexposed.
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...31&key=3012870
I have reached my upload limit for the day. I think the histogram looks OK so I will selectively do the two switchers and try again. If that doesn't work, maybe I will put a hand in the edge of the photo..  After all the SW 7 is a Heritage Unit!
__________________
Carl
My RP pics are HERE
My website is HERE
|
|
|
01-20-2014, 01:44 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 759
|
Grainy, overprocessed, cloudy day. Those are three things working against you. That blob of undefined whiteness in the sky is very unappealing. This would take a miracle to get accepted even with RP's odd screening patterns.
|
|
|
01-20-2014, 06:43 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,268
|
Yeah, if you exposed it to get the locos looking right then that sky would look even worse. There's a lot noise there too. Did you have the ISO cranked in the middle of the day?
|
|
|
01-21-2014, 03:14 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSX1702
Yeah, if you exposed it to get the locos looking right then that sky would look even worse.
|
And this is why you use layers and do selective processing.
Last edited by JimThias; 01-22-2014 at 12:37 AM.
Reason: typo
|
|
|
01-21-2014, 03:54 AM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,268
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimThias
And this is why use layers and do selective processing.
|
Or realize how crappy the conditions were and just take picture for personal use?
|
|
|
01-21-2014, 04:05 AM
|
#9
|
A dude with a camera
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 7,928
|
I think the exposure of the first one is not that far off. The second shot might work on Flickr, but it looks like you want crazy on the sliders. Sometimes we overthink processing and I think this is one of those cases.
|
|
|
01-22-2014, 12:38 AM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSX1702
Or realize how crappy the conditions were and just take picture for personal use? 
|
Even shots in crappy conditions can be processed correctly using layers.
|
|
|
01-22-2014, 01:51 AM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,268
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimThias
Even shots in crappy conditions can be processed correctly using layers.
|
Then again I'm not one for processing the hell out of pictures. I'm just saying, this specific shot probably can't be saved for RP. The rear end of the steam engine is cut off, the BNSF loco is cut off. Maybe given the rarity (is it rare, I have no idea?) of this event, a better angle would've gotten it on?
|
|
|
01-22-2014, 03:01 AM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSX1702
Then again I'm not one for processing the hell out of pictures. I'm just saying, this specific shot probably can't be saved for RP.
|
Sure, but it's still easily fixable with some selective editing, even if it's just for flickr or wherever else.
|
|
|
01-22-2014, 05:42 AM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,268
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimThias
Sure, but it's still easily fixable with some selective editing, even if it's just for flickr or wherever else. 
|
True. Pretty much everywhere except RP.
|
|
|
01-23-2014, 12:54 PM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 177
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimThias
Even shots in crappy conditions can be processed correctly using layers.
|
Please teach us how?(Or somehow by providing suitable links)
|
|
|
01-24-2014, 01:10 AM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lalam
Please teach us how?(Or somehow by providing suitable links) 
|
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/photosho...b64-78e3a.html
Last edited by JimThias; 01-24-2014 at 01:13 AM.
|
|
|
01-24-2014, 04:17 PM
|
#16
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 177
|
Thank you. Have started practice.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:08 PM.
|