Old 11-27-2012, 08:19 PM   #1
stlgevo51
Senior Member
 
stlgevo51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 759
Default I'm Confused

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...96&key=9235539
This shot was rejected three times for color and contrast. I took a break from it for a while and then resubmitted a version I edited just after the last rejection, and now it's getting an overprocessed rejection. I don't think this version looks great, but I don't know how to fix it. What should I do to improve?
__________________
Jake
Railpictures Shots RP stuff.
Flickr Shots All the RP stuff plus some failed experiments, wedgies, and junk.
Youtube Videos
stlgevo51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2012, 08:28 PM   #2
Mgoldman
Senior Member
 
Mgoldman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,661
Default

The image is a bit warm (auto-color will reduce the extra yellow in the image) and it is underexposed (take a look at levels and you'll see the histogram is a bit on the dark side).

It's a bit noisy as well - either you under exposed it and the noise was introduced when you processed it to bring back the brightness or you simply need to start from scratch and re-edit.

/Mitch
Mgoldman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2012, 09:03 PM   #3
JRMDC
Senior Member
 
JRMDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
Default

I think that "halos around darker objects" applies here, in spades. And the sky is well pixellated. And in general it has a "what the heck did you do to it" sort of look.

Start over.
__________________
My RP pix are here.
My Flickr pix are here.

My commentaries on rail pictures are in my blog.

RP Photo Albums:
Cabooses
Engine Details
Farm and Train
Plumes!
Railroad Details
Signal Details
Switchstand Shots
JRMDC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2012, 09:09 PM   #4
KevinM
Senior Member
 
KevinM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,087
Default

Hi Jake,

Can you show us the original image? That might give us an idea as to how much of an adjustment it took to get it to its current state and whether or not it can be brought to an acceptable state with reasonable adjustments. I am assuming that you are working from a raw file. Raw format provides a lot more latitude to correct an image that is over/under exposed.

As for the current version, I think the screener called it correctly. It definitely is possible to process a photo to the point of abuse. I should know. I've been guilty of "photo abuse" in the past. One or two of them actually got PCAs.... One of these days I'm going to fix those.
__________________
/Kevin

My RP stuff is here.

Link to my Flickr Albums. Lots of Steam Railroad stuff there from all over the US.
KevinM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 12:37 AM   #5
JimThias
Senior Member
 
JimThias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMDC View Post
I think that "halos around darker objects" applies here, in spades.
I see lots of halos as well. If you dim your monitor, they really stand out.
__________________
.
Rhymes with slice, rice and mice, and probably should be spelled like "Tice."

This pretty much sums it up: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Thias
JimThias is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.