02-08-2011, 10:33 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: California
Posts: 219
|
Any chance for rare power?
|
|
|
02-08-2011, 10:34 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: California
Posts: 219
|
The photos
sorry forgot that you cant see those...
here are the photos:
|
|
|
02-08-2011, 10:37 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 372
|
 And you guys over there laugh at us when we go nuts over Yellow & Orange GEs... You guys can keep that trash over there for as long as you want...hell send it to Mexico.
Anyways, why do you shoot from that one spot at JLS again?
|
|
|
02-08-2011, 10:40 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: California
Posts: 219
|
haha, this spot gave me better results then the platform... so i decided to shoot the rare power from there...
|
|
|
02-08-2011, 10:41 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 1,398
|
I see a boring NS unit and possibly a P42. Why not show the whole train? The engine itself isnt rare, but the train as a whole is not uncommon, but at the same time not a normal occurrence(although around here it seems like thats all they run with). I think if you had shot the train it would stand a better shot. And why the hell did you submit two of the same shot pretty much?
__________________
I personally have had a problem with those trying to tell us to turn railroad photography into an "art form." It's fine for them to do so, I welcome it in fact, but what I do have a problem with is that the practitioners of the more "arty" shots, I have found, tend to look down their nose's at others who are shooting more "mundane" shots.
Railroad photography is what you make of it, but one way is not "better" than another, IMHO. Unless you have a pole right thought the nose of the engine! -SG
|
|
|
02-08-2011, 10:49 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by coaststarlight14
sorry forgot that you cant see those...
here are the photos:
|
Bad angle, compostion or cropping on all of them. Seriously...pay attention to signs and whatnot when shooting. One of them says "Square." Uhh, WHAT "Square?"
|
|
|
02-08-2011, 11:02 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: California
Posts: 219
|
i see what you mean...but well, we can't change what already happened...so i'll deal with these photos now, and hope for a northbound with the same consist or something...
|
|
|
02-08-2011, 11:13 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,777
|
You never learn will you....
Railroad photography basics: Outside of the curve sucks unless your going for a nose tellemash, very bad for showing a interesting consist.
Second: I'm surpised the self proclaimed "street running king" hasn't bitched you out about it yet, but why on earth would you shoot at a fairly boring Amtrak station rather than the awesome streetrunning, makes absolutely no sense.
Third: Its pretty poor practice to send in 3 identical shots at once.
Oh and Ant speak for yourself, wont see me foaming over UP and BNSF trashcabs
|
|
|
02-09-2011, 03:17 AM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 175
|
Not to put too fine a point on it, but...
I just did a quick search through the home page for an NS C40-9W, and it returned 11,590 images. Does that answer your question RE rare power?
__________________
The light at the end of the tunnel is an oncoming train. I have the pictures to prove it.
|
|
|
02-09-2011, 03:23 AM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 1,003
|
I think what Coast means is that this is a Norfolk Southern engine pulling a passenger train into Jack London Square in Oakland California, 2,000 miles from it's home rails.
To me this seems fairly rare to have the combination of NS engine pulling a passenger train in Oakland CA. I'd expect to see a UP or BNSF helper unit.
I know there is an NS engine that works with BNSF running back and fourth on the BNSF Mainline though.
|
|
|
02-09-2011, 03:32 AM
|
#11
|
RailPictures.Net Crew
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Nitro, WV
Posts: 2,195
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikos1
You never learn will you....
Railroad photography basics: Outside of the curve sucks unless your going for a nose tellemash, very bad for showing a interesting consist.
Second: I'm surpised the self proclaimed "street running king" hasn't bitched you out about it yet, but why on earth would you shoot at a fairly boring Amtrak station rather than the awesome streetrunning, makes absolutely no sense.
Third: Its pretty poor practice to send in 3 identical shots at once.
Oh and Ant speak for yourself, wont see me foaming over UP and BNSF trashcabs 
|
Haha, street running king? More like, master of the wedgie.
Chase
|
|
|
02-09-2011, 04:09 AM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,861
|
Why were the first two shots in the queue back-to-back? It's the same shot at the same location of the same thing...just a little farther down the line. Pick one (the best one) and submit only that.
I'm surprised you're not down to 1 or 2 uploads per day...
|
|
|
02-09-2011, 05:13 AM
|
#13
|
Met Fan
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,043
|
I would recommend in the future that when something like this happens, that you make a special effort to show the location (as well as the entire train).
As others have pointed out, an NS wide cab GE is meaningless... but a NS wide cab GE leading an Amtrak through Jack London Square is a once ever shot. You need to get that shot... with a familiar Jack London iconic building and the famous street running.
It's a mistake I made when I was a kid. A Frisco U25B came through NJ once, and I got to it and shot it tight, so you couldn't tell where it was.
|
|
|
02-09-2011, 06:12 AM
|
#14
|
-_-
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hiltons, Virginia, USA
Posts: 953
|
I kind of like the third one, I would have shot something similar, but from the other side of the tracks coming around the curve. Hard to do when you don't have a lot of reach though..
As for the other two, I would have zoomed out as wide as possible to shoot the catfish leading a passenger train. I think its a cool consist, but I would shoot it completely different.
|
|
|
02-09-2011, 06:48 AM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 372
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chase55671
Haha, street running king? More like, master of the wedgie.
Chase
|
No, that would actually be another RP contributor, but we won't mention any names, We'll just keep this mud fight between me and the King of Point & Shoot....
BTW, the wedgies were a thing of the past, being that my first page of photos there's only maybe 4-15 so called wedgies...
 | PhotoID: 350758 Photograph © Anthony Davis |
Last time I checked that wasn't a wedgie in my book
Oh and Nikos, don't act like you don't foam over Orange...
 | PhotoID: 309845 Photograph © Nikos Kavoori |
Last edited by AntD.; 02-09-2011 at 06:52 AM.
|
|
|
02-09-2011, 07:48 AM
|
#16
|
RailPictures.Net Crew
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Nitro, WV
Posts: 2,195
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntD.
No, that would actually be another RP contributor, but we won't mention any names, We'll just keep this mud fight between me and the King of Point & Shoot....
BTW, the wedgies were a thing of the past, being that my first page of photos there's only maybe 4-15 so called wedgies...
 | PhotoID: 350758 Photograph © Anthony Davis |
Last time I checked that wasn't a wedgie in my book 
|
And it certainly doesn't appear to be a street running scene, so that makes both of our statements inaccurate.
Perhaps "king of excessive use of the bold font" would be an appropriate title.
Chase
Last edited by Chase55671; 02-09-2011 at 07:51 AM.
|
|
|
02-09-2011, 01:14 PM
|
#17
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Marlboro, New Jersey
Posts: 1,007
|
How does shooting the same stretch of street running in one town make someone the "street running king"? Shouldn't the name go to someone who has a bunch of different locations in their street running portfolio?
- Chris
|
|
|
02-09-2011, 01:16 PM
|
#18
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hilldale, West Virginia
Posts: 3,878
|
No rules apply when you're self appointed?
Loyd L.
|
|
|
02-09-2011, 02:30 PM
|
#19
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
In my view, if the engine does not appear in a shot (in this case CSXT 4617) then its number should not appear in the locomotive ID section. The B/W simply is not a shot of CSXT 4617.
Last edited by JRMDC; 02-09-2011 at 02:50 PM.
|
|
|
02-09-2011, 04:27 PM
|
#20
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 372
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chase55671
And it certainly doesn't appear to be a street running scene, so that makes both of our statements inaccurate.
Perhaps "king of excessive use of the bold font" would be an appropriate title.
Chase
|
Yea, that's more like it! Haven't you heard Chase? Bold is Better! BTW, I didn't know making one sentence bold was excessive, my bad.
And oh, you meant non-wedgie street running scene eh? Well here ya, go.
 | PhotoID: 352378 Photograph © Anthony Davis |
Quote:
Originally Posted by cblaz
How does shooting the same stretch of street running in one town make someone the "street running king"? Shouldn't the name go to someone who has a bunch of different locations in their street running portfolio?
- Chris
|
Actually Chris I don't think was Augusta (Oh, boy watch Nikos try to take credit for this)... but I'm planning on trying to revisit this spot next week to hopefully get better shot along this line....
 | PhotoID: 324099 Photograph © Anthony Davis |
Just gotta take some vacation from work to go visit NC, PA, CA, NY, KY just to name a few so I can obtain my official crown.
|
|
|
02-09-2011, 04:28 PM
|
#21
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 372
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMDC
In my view, if the engine does not appear in a shot (in this case CSXT 4617) then its number should not appear in the locomotive ID section. The B/W simply is not a shot of CSXT 4617.
|
Oh, let me go fix that...I wouldn't want too many people crying over it...
|
|
|
02-09-2011, 04:56 PM
|
#22
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,777
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntD.
Last time I checked that wasn't a wedgie in my book
Oh and Nikos, don't act like you don't foam over Orange...
 | PhotoID: 309845 Photograph © Nikos Kavoori |
|
Oh boy where to start, weee you shot a MOW dude walking in the dust, so awesome that must make you 3000000X more creative than me....
2. as for the BNSF, FAIL......A: I was waiting for something much better -
 | PhotoID: 300862 Photograph © Nikos Kavoori |
and B: The light was awesome and it was a good shot, wasnt going to not shoot it because it was junk. Do we need to bring up the little hissy fit you had over missing a BNSF GEVO that first time in Atlanta?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chase55671
Perhaps "king of excessive use of the bold font" would be an appropriate title.
Chase
|
-Nikos Kavoori likes this....
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntD.
Actually Chris I don't think was Augusta (Oh, boy watch Nikos try to take credit for this)...
 | PhotoID: 324099 Photograph © Anthony Davis |
|
The fact that you didnt have a clue Sandersville had street running before I told you?
Are you getting bored because I dont sign onto Yahoo nowdays?
|
|
|
02-09-2011, 05:05 PM
|
#23
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 1,398
|
__________________
I personally have had a problem with those trying to tell us to turn railroad photography into an "art form." It's fine for them to do so, I welcome it in fact, but what I do have a problem with is that the practitioners of the more "arty" shots, I have found, tend to look down their nose's at others who are shooting more "mundane" shots.
Railroad photography is what you make of it, but one way is not "better" than another, IMHO. Unless you have a pole right thought the nose of the engine! -SG
|
|
|
02-09-2011, 05:07 PM
|
#24
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 372
|
Quote:
Are you getting bored because I dont sign onto Yahoo nowdays?
|
That's probably the most homo thing I've heard... and I'm just going to leave it at that...This has gone too far...
Last edited by AntD.; 02-09-2011 at 05:18 PM.
Reason: Thanks Cblaz
|
|
|
02-09-2011, 05:09 PM
|
#25
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 1,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntD.
That's probably the most homo thing I've heard... and I'm just going to leave it at that...This has went too far...
|
__________________
I personally have had a problem with those trying to tell us to turn railroad photography into an "art form." It's fine for them to do so, I welcome it in fact, but what I do have a problem with is that the practitioners of the more "arty" shots, I have found, tend to look down their nose's at others who are shooting more "mundane" shots.
Railroad photography is what you make of it, but one way is not "better" than another, IMHO. Unless you have a pole right thought the nose of the engine! -SG
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:56 AM.
|