Old 07-18-2008, 09:58 PM   #1
Senior Member
trainboysd40's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta on the CP Laggan Subdivision
Posts: 2,048
Send a message via MSN to trainboysd40
Default Bad angle, or is it the clouds?

got a D5 IIi and now he doesnt afread fo 12800 iSO
Youtube (Model Railway, Vlogs, Tutorials, and prototype)
My Website
Obligatory link to shots on RP, HERE
trainboysd40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2008, 10:00 PM   #2
Met Fan
Freericks's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,043

Might be the near Fish Eye effect. Are there such distorted wide angle views in the data base?
Freericks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2008, 10:03 PM   #3
Senior Member
Ween's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,861

Well, there's a strange glow all along the length of the telephone pole on the right and there's some sort of blob on the right side of the green-roofed building right before the lead unit's nose. But...

As for the bad angle, maybe it's because there's not much going on on the right side of the frame.
Ween is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2008, 10:23 PM   #4
InspetorMFD's Avatar
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 37

I have to agree with Freericks and go with the fisheye distortion.
InspetorMFD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2008, 10:47 PM   #5
River Rails Photography
River Rails Photography's Avatar
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 404
Send a message via AIM to River Rails Photography

Right, blame it on the clouds.

I agree with Freericks, near fisheye.

Last edited by River Rails Photography; 07-18-2008 at 10:47 PM. Reason: forgot an lol
River Rails Photography is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008, 01:00 AM   #6
Senior Member
quiksmith10's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Norman, OK / Frederick, MD
Posts: 269
Send a message via AIM to quiksmith10

Besides the flaws due to over-editing (the halos), I personally like the composition of the photo. Although, the crop could be a bit tighter, especially on the left side of the photo. Have you tried an appeal with your side of the story?

As far as the fish-eye look being the rejection, there are photos in the database that were taken with a fish-eye lense. I don't think that is the problem. Here are several examples from Swami:

Image © Swami -- swamiphoto.homeip.net
PhotoID: 198154
Photograph © Swami -- swamiphoto.homeip.net

Image © Swami -- swamiphoto.homeip.net
PhotoID: 198843
Photograph © Swami -- swamiphoto.homeip.net

Image © Swami -- swamiphoto.homeip.net
PhotoID: 232941
Photograph © Swami -- swamiphoto.homeip.net
Brandon Smith

Click here to view my photos at Railpictures.net!

Photography Portfolio: http://www.flickr.com/photos/53118039@N05/
quiksmith10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008, 01:08 AM   #7
Joe the Photog
A dude with a camera
Joe the Photog's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 7,928

Trainboy might be right to a certain point. If the sky was more pristine or if the clouds were more blobs with blue in between, then *maybe* this shot would get in. On the other hand, the wide angle is ditortion is a little much even for my tastes. And this comes from someone who shot this --

Image ©
Photograph ©

The difference in our shots, aside from the sky, is that mine is bracketed by poles on both sids. The distortion brings them both in which makes the shot make sense whereas your shot just has one pole which looks like it's about to fall down.

Joseph C. Hinson Photography
Joe the Photog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008, 01:52 AM   #8
alstom's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Firestone Park, OH
Posts: 379

Like Ween said, there is a blotch on the roof of the building, on the lead unit's windshield and there is a glow around the telephone pole. Usually that glow is caused by great use of the Shadows/Highlights feature. Refrain from using that tool too much, because it results in stuff like that, or it causes digital noise/fake appearance.
alstom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008, 03:51 AM   #9
I shoot what I like
milwman's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cedar Fall's, Iowa
Posts: 2,474
Send a message via Yahoo to milwman

The rain drops on the lens don't help, thats the blobs. But the keystoning just doesn't work for me. Worked it over in PS a bit of PC helps
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	mat hicks shot copy.jpg
Views:	88
Size:	371.1 KB
ID:	3096  
Richard Scott Marsh I go by Scott long story


Last edited by milwman; 07-19-2008 at 04:04 AM.
milwman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008, 11:11 AM   #10
Senior Member
JRMDC's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202

First of all, I'm pretty sure it's not a fisheye, it's a 10mm ultra-wide angle, the Canon 10-22. I don't see any of the "curviness" that one sees with fisheye shots.

Second, if you want to go ultra-wide, there should be a reason to do so. Taking a standard wedgie with ultra-wide just results in a weird looking wedgie, and RP does not generally do weird for the sake of weird.

Swami's shots "work" - at least to my eye - because s/he captures compositions that can't be captured at a less extreme angle; the compositions combine elements in extreme ways. I loved the Portland station shot at the time and I am glad to be reminded of it so I can see it again.

Hmm, that reminds me, time for an ultra-wide post to the blog!
My RP pix are here.
My Flickr pix are here.

My commentaries on rail pictures are in my blog.

RP Photo Albums:
Engine Details
Farm and Train
Railroad Details
Signal Details
Switchstand Shots
JRMDC is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.