04-06-2008, 03:43 AM
|
#1
|
Aussie Driver
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 35
|
Couple of rejects (incl. Tunnel shot)
Gday all
Just wondering about these couple of rejects, is there anything I can do to them to get them into the database??
The first is a tunnel shot, I tried uploading a front on photo, but it was continually rejected for being too dark until it got to the point of being too noisy, then was rejected for poor composition. Therefore, I tried uploading this one:
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...2&key=15850802
However, it too is getting rejected for being too dark.. Should I try to lighten it up some more again, and hope for the best?
The other one is an evening tram shot, just after sunset:
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...d=506400&key=0
I wanted to try and get the red light throughout the sky, I think it adds that little bit extra to the photo, but it has been rejected for Poor Lighting (Backlit). Once again, anything I can do with it, or should I just keep it in the personal collection??
Thanks in advance.
Pete Reading.
|
|
|
04-06-2008, 04:23 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,986
|
Distracting backlight
In both shots the bright lights pull your eye away from the train. On the tunnel shot, the eye keeps fighting the lights. The white squiggly on the nose of the train in the tunnel doesn't help. The cab light needs to be on to balance the dark train and bright lights. A crew member would help too.
The red passenger train itself has fabulous texture! Looks like a high price car ad. Tomorrow start selling yourself to BMW or Audi! Wow!
However, here too the bright background pulls the eye away from the subject thus the rejection. (I think) The bright building and the pole do not help.
Different, darker background, say no building, some light on the front, but same light on the train, you'd have a winner!
I hope someday to get light like that myself.
|
|
|
04-06-2008, 03:11 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 381
|
The first pic is almost head-on, yet there is little light on the nose ... personal collection. The lighting quality is really nice, appeal this one, another screener may like it.
|
|
|
04-07-2008, 03:27 AM
|
#4
|
Aussie Driver
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 35
|
Thanks for the replies fella's, it looks like tunnel shots are more for the personal collection!
I will try the late afternoon tram shot again to see what I can do, fingers crossed I might get it into the database..
Thanks again.
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 02:55 PM
|
#5
|
The Photo Journalist
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 630
|
That light was fantastic in Le Mans, Pete! Looks almost like an artists impression to me.
Here's my version of the tunnel shot:
http://web1.railpictures.net/images/....jpg.88534.jpg
... hopefully it will be accepted. I had to adjust the exposure slightly because the image was over exposed.
__________________
My portfolio at RailPictures.Net!
My portfolio at Flickr!
The views expressed in this reply are personal and do not represent the views or policy of my employer.
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 03:08 PM
|
#6
|
The Photo Journalist
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 630
|
Ok, rejected for too much noise/grain the second time around. All I did was slightly alter the exposure!
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...key=1159971926
What do you think?
__________________
My portfolio at RailPictures.Net!
My portfolio at Flickr!
The views expressed in this reply are personal and do not represent the views or policy of my employer.
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 03:20 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marlboro, NJ
Posts: 1,956
|
Forget the tunnel shots lets see that sunset one get in! Did you appeal?!
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 03:35 PM
|
#8
|
The Photo Journalist
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 630
|
My sunset tram shot was taken from a slightly different angle to Pete's shot and has slightly different colour.
http://web1.railpictures.net/images/....JPG.27812.jpg
__________________
My portfolio at RailPictures.Net!
My portfolio at Flickr!
The views expressed in this reply are personal and do not represent the views or policy of my employer.
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 04:57 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelJ
|
Interesting, thanks for sharing so we can see the comparison. Sorry, though, but I like Pete's a lot more - the colors are richer.
Just goes to show how minor differences in position with respect to the light can affect things.
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 01:29 AM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
I'd say either appeal or reduce overall saturation by a touch and resubmit.
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 01:49 AM
|
#12
|
Aussie Driver
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 35
|
Okie dokie, I have reduced the saturation by a fraction, and have reuploaded it, so fingers crossed!!
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 02:43 AM
|
#13
|
Aussie Driver
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 35
|
Success!!
 | PhotoID: 230775 Photograph © Peter Reading |
Thanks for the help everyone!
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 05:33 AM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,986
|
Congrats!
I think you have JRMDC and his helpful hints to thank!
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 02:17 PM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis A. Livesey
Congrats!
I think you have JRMDC and his helpful hints to thank!
|
As wrong as I am sometimes, like this one, where I thought the bright spot at the right corner had to go,
 | PhotoID: 230743 Photograph © Charles Freericks |
it's nice to be right sometimes.
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 02:21 PM
|
#16
|
Aussie Driver
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 35
|
Hahaha, you can't be right all the time, but thankfully you were right this time!! Thanks again mate!
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:07 AM.
|