08-05-2010, 12:02 AM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
Gallery and Discussion: Shadows
In another thread Troy objects to a shot that has shadows on the trailing cars but has lit power. How do you feel about those shots, and about shadows in general?
I have two shots, same location, where the power is completely or generally lit and shadows appear on the side of the train. As it happens, in both cases the power was pushing. I won't claim these as my better work, just simple wedgies, accepted a long time ago. I like the one in particular because one can see the train approaching its signal. Or, maybe only I can see it, having the memory of the situation, as the signals are hardly prominent:
 | PhotoID: 168995 Photograph © Janusz Mrozek |
 | PhotoID: 168983 Photograph © Janusz Mrozek |
I wonder if they would be accepted today.
The third shot has irregular nose shadows, which reflect the nature of a good bit of the CSX Metropolitan sub.
 | PhotoID: 176685 Photograph © Janusz Mrozek |
It was accepted only upon appeal then, if I remember correctly, and I wonder how it would do now.
Personally I am fine with the lighting in these shots, again, not my better work, and I think it is especially appropriate for the CSX nose shot. I do understand that RP and each of you may have differing tastes for shadows.
What I am really hoping for is that some of you post those shadow shots I love, those where the power is lit, the rest of the train is in shadow, and so the power really stands out in the frame. My shots are hardly good exemplars around which to build a discussion.
Last edited by JRMDC; 08-05-2010 at 12:04 AM.
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 12:34 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 1,398
|
 | PhotoID: 296049 Photograph © Max Medlin |
 | PhotoID: 309328 Photograph © Max Medlin |
My personal favorite:
 | PhotoID: 318052 Photograph © Max Medlin |
__________________
I personally have had a problem with those trying to tell us to turn railroad photography into an "art form." It's fine for them to do so, I welcome it in fact, but what I do have a problem with is that the practitioners of the more "arty" shots, I have found, tend to look down their nose's at others who are shooting more "mundane" shots.
Railroad photography is what you make of it, but one way is not "better" than another, IMHO. Unless you have a pole right thought the nose of the engine! -SG
Last edited by coborn35; 08-05-2010 at 06:20 PM.
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 12:47 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,460
|
The cars aren't even part of the train! haha
Classic Rook shot, power pops even with all the nice elements surrounding the scene
 | PhotoID: 326428 Photograph © Ben Sutton |
One of the reasons why I went to Harpers Ferry, to catch the rock train. Barely made it in time, shadows everywhere but the lead is in great light, really extenuates the power
 | PhotoID: 322604 Photograph © Ben Sutton |
The whole shot is a shadow, which can work in your advantage.
 | PhotoID: 319214 Photograph © Ben Sutton |
Probably my most favorite "shadow" shot
 | PhotoID: 318911 Photograph © Ben Sutton |
Shadows, either big (3/4 or the whole scene) or small (on the nose, side, etc) aren't necessarily a bad thing. Working around them can be a pain, or can be easy. Make the most of the annoyance and it shouldn't be a problem.
Ben
__________________
Trains.
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 12:52 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mudgee N.S.W. Australia
Posts: 641
|
I think i only have three that fit the thread,
this shot the whole train is in shadow but the clean paint stands out.
 | PhotoID: 328678 Photograph © mark woody |
in this shot train hits a break in the hills at around the same time as the sun but the train remains in shadow.
 | PhotoID: 327455 Photograph © mark woody |
in this shot the low angle at sunrise causes the train behind the locos to be in shadow.
 | PhotoID: 323989 Photograph © mark woody |
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 12:53 AM
|
#5
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,333
|
Most of the pictures posted so far are not wedgies like the one I commented on
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 01:15 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troy12n
Most of the pictures posted so far are not wedgies like the one I commented on
|
True enough. And I gave you guff in that thread not for your opinion but for your timing in expressing it.  And this thread isn't about that thread or your opinion expressed there anyway, just inspired by them.
But how do you justify a) accepting a looser standard on nose light such as a half-lit nose (what I infer from your posts in the yet other thread) and at the same time b) not accepting some shadow on the sides of cars trailing well-lit power?
BTW, if I have your position on a) correct, I agree with you there!
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 01:16 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark woody
 | PhotoID: 327455 Photograph © mark woody |
|
That's what I am thinking of! Nice.
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 01:42 AM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Libertyville, Il
Posts: 937
|
I've got some with bad shadows.
 | PhotoID: 307045 Photograph © Chris Zygmunt |
 | PhotoID: 319362 Photograph © Chris Zygmunt |
 | PhotoID: 299160 Photograph © Chris Zygmunt |
 | PhotoID: 293133 Photograph © Chris Zygmunt |
 | PhotoID: 286928 Photograph © Chris Zygmunt |
Chris Z
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 01:48 AM
|
#9
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,333
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMDC
But how do you justify a) accepting a looser standard on nose light such as a half-lit nose (what I infer from your posts in the yet other thread) and at the same time b) not accepting some shadow on the sides of cars trailing well-lit power?
|
There is no right answer there, I find an entirely lit TRAIN, with half nose light, or partially lit NOSE to be more aesthetically pleasing.
Using that other picture as an example, for all intents and purposes, the entire train was in the shadows except the locomotive, in some scenarios or scenes, that would be fine, sometimes spectacular. But in that one, (IMHO) it was poor.
And lets get real, it wasnt SOME shadows on the cars, 90% of the viewable cars were in the shadow. And if you want to split hairs, the nose wasnt 100% lit, some shadows on it too.
You got me on the timing of my comment. In posts like this, I dont take the time to read all the comments most of the time because they are mostly irrelevant to what I am going to say.
Last edited by troy12n; 08-05-2010 at 01:51 AM.
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 01:50 AM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troy12n
There is no right answer there
|
True dat ...
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 01:52 AM
|
#11
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,333
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Z
I've got some with bad shadows.
 | PhotoID: 286928 Photograph © Chris Zygmunt |
|
Bad example, I think you were lucky to get that on
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 03:22 AM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
Shadows on the nose...
 | PhotoID: 272021 Photograph © Jim Thias |
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 03:22 AM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 287
|
Shadows aren't always bad and certainly not always a killer:
 | PhotoID: 333714 Photograph © Michael Harding |
Regards,
Michael
__________________
Michael Harding
P&WV fan in HO
Click Here to view my photos at RailPictures.Net!
Click Here to view my Toledo Railfan Photo Location map!
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 04:43 AM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 611
|
I think shadows can help highlight the subject and add to the depth.
Here are my shadow shots. Or was that shots with shadows? 
Only The Shadow knows ....
A Troy peeve here  | PhotoID: 319916 Photograph © Jim Dorst |
Even mentioned shadows here  | PhotoID: 297325 Photograph © Jim Dorst |
Big shadow  | PhotoID: 295766 Photograph © Jim Dorst |
Shadows for effect. One of my favourites.
 | PhotoID: 282129 Photograph © Jim Dorst |
Shadows to separate the new from the old.
 | PhotoID: 222913 Photograph © Jim Dorst |
__________________
Cheers, Jim.
Click Here to view my photos at RailPictures.Net!
Last edited by Northern Limits; 08-05-2010 at 04:47 AM.
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 06:08 AM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 590
|
Hmm... Giant foreground shadows aren't always problems.
 | PhotoID: 332683 Photograph © David Honan |
 | PhotoID: 298702 Photograph © David Honan |
What Janusz is looking for:
 | PhotoID: 272397 Photograph © David Honan |
 | PhotoID: 296505 Photograph © David Honan |
Shadows can really help set the scene by clearly indicating the time of day:
 | PhotoID: 331013 Photograph © David Honan |
 | PhotoID: 327944 Photograph © David Honan |
Sometimes the entire train is in shadow, but the shot still works:
 | PhotoID: 300536 Photograph © David Honan |
 | PhotoID: 269323 Photograph © David Honan |
Last edited by DWHonan; 08-05-2010 at 06:12 AM.
Reason: Added the Sounder photo ... and then removed it because it doesn't really fit. #269503 if anyone cares.
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 12:09 PM
|
#16
|
I shoot what I like
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cedar Fall's, Iowa
Posts: 2,474
|
 | PhotoID: 327725 Photograph © Scott Marsh |
Here is my bad light photo. Sun is a bit high but over all I liked it as it is. It's the overall scene that is the shot not just the power.
Others will think its bad and don't belong on here and some I know will think its fine and thats ok. The line runs NW at this point and all most never has good light on the front. Trash it if you like GRIN 8*} I have 1 shadowed shot on RP so this will have to do as I never post them, Soon to be deleted.
Last edited by milwman; 08-05-2010 at 12:34 PM.
Reason: add more
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 01:04 PM
|
#17
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 51
|
 | PhotoID: 295920 Photograph © Franklin Adams |
all shadow, little bit of light
 | PhotoID: 309587 Photograph © Franklin Adams |
 | PhotoID: 250556 Photograph © B.F. Adams |
a photograph of a shadow
__________________
My pix are here .
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 01:34 PM
|
#18
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,333
|
Alot of the pictures posted are great, but they are not wedgies for the most part.
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 05:00 PM
|
#19
|
A dude with a camera
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 7,928
|
A lot of the shots being posted aren't really shadows, but rather "intereting" lighting. If I read what Janusz wrote that way he intended, he means shadows falling onto the train whereas some guys are lining shadows falling off the train.
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 05:08 PM
|
#20
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog
A lot of the shots being posted aren't really shadows, but rather "intereting" lighting. If I read what Janusz wrote that way he intended, he means shadows falling onto the train whereas some guys are lining shadows falling off the train.
|
Correct, but no thread on any internet forum goes in the direction originally intended.
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 05:18 PM
|
#21
|
A dude with a camera
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 7,928
|
Not falling onto the train, but I wondered if there was too much shadow in the shot.
 | PhotoID: Photograph © |
Shadow of cut of cars on second unit back.
 | PhotoID: Photograph © |
Probably helps that the entire train is in shadow, not to mention the power.
 | PhotoID: Photograph © |
Would not be accepted now
 | PhotoID: Photograph © |
 | PhotoID: Photograph © |
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 05:37 PM
|
#22
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 1,398
|
I really enjoy Tim Stevens work with the shadows. With the sweet light he gets, it really pops the power and looks great.
 | PhotoID: 333493 Photograph © Tim Stevens |
 | PhotoID: 329580 Photograph © Tim Stevens |
 | PhotoID: 298403 Photograph © Tim Stevens |
__________________
I personally have had a problem with those trying to tell us to turn railroad photography into an "art form." It's fine for them to do so, I welcome it in fact, but what I do have a problem with is that the practitioners of the more "arty" shots, I have found, tend to look down their nose's at others who are shooting more "mundane" shots.
Railroad photography is what you make of it, but one way is not "better" than another, IMHO. Unless you have a pole right thought the nose of the engine! -SG
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 07:42 PM
|
#23
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Brighton Minnesota
Posts: 361
|
Some of mine.
 | PhotoID: 284144 Photograph © Alec Holmes |
 | PhotoID: 196071 Photograph © Alec Holmes |
 | PhotoID: 194298 Photograph © Alec Holmes |
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 10:52 PM
|
#24
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 787
|
I love shadows as long as they are clear of the subject - train. I don't mind shadows on cars or trailing locomotives, but in my opinion the lead unit needs to be well lit with no shadows.
This shot below is one of my most recent favorites with shadows:

This shot is probably my all-time favorite with cloud shadows and shadows from the mountain I'm standing on and the perfect sucker hole opening for the power:
 | PhotoID: 255400 Photograph © christophersmuller.com |
|
|
|
08-06-2010, 01:56 AM
|
#25
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 172
|
This was just rejected for shadows yesterday...but apparently it was accepted today on appeal. No fancy use of shadows, just them laying across the loco
 | PhotoID: 333739 Photograph © Nick McLean |
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:34 AM.
|