09-05-2012, 03:15 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Brazil
Posts: 9
|
Help !
Hi,
IŽve corrected this almost 4 times, according to rejections (cropping, contrast, exposure, leveling, sharpen, etc...)
But, it was rejected, anyway. 
Suggestions on how to improve/correct ?
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...38&key=8478642
thanks !!
Lucas
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 03:43 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 602
|
Stuff like this is why people hate RP, that is a perfectly acceptable Image IMO. Try changing the width to 1024 instead of 1200 and the height accordingly. The smaller size may get their mind off the soft rejection.
__________________
-Brent Kneebush
Defiance, Ohio
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 04:24 AM
|
#3
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In the California Republic
Posts: 2,774
|
The logo on the front of the lead engine is totally blurry.
You need to fix that.
Additionally, the color is a little flat and you might get the bad contrast rejection too.
That is also presumably fixable.
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 05:51 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holloran Grade
The logo on the front of the lead engine is totally blurry.
|
"totally" blurry? It seems fine to me. Maybe some like things sharper, I know, but I object to the exaggeration.
Lucas, the downsizing to 1024 is a good idea. Personally I think it is fine, but RP does love things quite sharp.
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 05:32 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
I realize this won't be very popular with some, and bad cropping wasn't part of the original rejection, but to my crazy eyes this crop works better with the scene:
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 07:04 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 287
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimThias
I realize this won't be very popular with some, and bad cropping wasn't part of the original rejection, but to my crazy eyes this crop works better with the scene:
Attachment 7649
|
I definitely agree with Jim's crop - and it might head off a potential "bad cropping" rejection. The original isn't bad, but has a bunch of lower left dead space and cuts off the train awkwardly (whereas Jim uses the tree to cut off the train). The rest of the issues seem to be processing ones.
Good luck.
__________________
Michael Harding
P&WV fan in HO
Click Here to view my photos at RailPictures.Net!
Click Here to view my Toledo Railfan Photo Location map!
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 11:16 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,777
|
I dont like that crop, I think you can keep more of the scene and still end up with a decent aspect ratio, less sky, and crop to the right of the catenary pole, and then maybe a little off the left side.
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 11:35 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDH
I definitely agree with Jim's crop - and it might head off a potential "bad cropping" rejection. The original isn't bad, but has a bunch of lower left dead space and cuts off the train awkwardly (whereas Jim uses the tree to cut off the train).
|
To me there was also too much boring sky in the original and lacking a bit in the ROT department.
|
|
|
09-06-2012, 03:13 AM
|
#9
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Brazil
Posts: 9
|
Thank you ! 
IŽll try to change te size and cropping and submit it again.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:45 PM.
|