11-21-2014, 03:47 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 1,003
|
Any ideas if this is possible
I liked this location how it has the tunnel and the tower but the anti-pedestrian fences really make it hard to shoot.
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...31&key=8273288
|
|
|
11-21-2014, 04:55 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
It looks tight on the sides. I am guessing that what you could add to the right of the signal is unattractive? EXIF says you shot at 80mm, try wider. But I'm not sure of what the screener's objection is, I'll await other opinions.
Note that, when you rotated the image, you left a bit in the upper right corner as blank. (Another reason to shoot a little wider.)
|
|
|
11-21-2014, 06:42 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 1,003
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMDC
It looks tight on the sides. I am guessing that what you could add to the right of the signal is unattractive? EXIF says you shot at 80mm, try wider. But I'm not sure of what the screener's objection is, I'll await other opinions.
Note that, when you rotated the image, you left a bit in the upper right corner as blank. (Another reason to shoot a little wider.)
|
The problem is, if I shoot any wider, you would see the beginning of the fence between the tracks. I thought that might be a distracting element.
|
|
|
11-21-2014, 07:26 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
thoughts:
- shoot wider on the right, but not on the left
- time it a few seconds earlier so the train doesn't crowd the left edge
|
|
|
11-21-2014, 07:28 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,674
|
"RailPictures.Net prefers that images are composed in keeping with the 'Rule of Thirds' meaning that, in most circumstances, the focal point of the image should not be directly in the center of the frame, or too close to any of the edges."
Tell them to better comply with their stated issue, you made no corrections nor edit and would like to appeal the shot.
Looks great to me.
Thanks for your attempt at something a little different and unique.
/Mitch
|
|
|
11-21-2014, 08:12 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA area
Posts: 729
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mgoldman
Tell them to better comply with their stated issue, you made no corrections nor edit and would like to appeal the shot.
|
I agree with Mitch.
I'd do an appeal after correcting your cropping boo-boo that J noted. Three of my last four photos had to be appealed to be accepted.
The Judge is approachable, just state your case with tact and respect. Good Luck!
__________________
Carl
My RP pics are HERE
My website is HERE
|
|
|
11-22-2014, 03:58 PM
|
#7
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 185
|
No doubt you meant the signal and Prudential tower to be parts of the composition, but being 'way over on the right makes it distracting. Don't know how ugly the pedestrian fence is, but a tiny fraction of it on the right may not be too bad.
The alternative would to be brutal. Crop from the right and top. Still won't get the train exactly in the preferred RP sweet spot, but closer.
I agree with Janusz, a frame with the train closer to the tunnel or a wider angle lens would be easier to work with.
|
|
|
11-24-2014, 04:02 AM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 1,003
|
Hopefully my work sends me to the tech conference again this summer.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:02 PM.
|