03-06-2012, 07:41 AM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 197
|
Align with the Building?
Hello again,
Would you align with something different than vertical edge of the red painted building behind the FXE loco?
Cheers
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...05&key=9825307
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 12:23 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 125
|
Align with the building?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BUFFIE
|
Aligning with the vertical/plumb line of a building is generally a good way to level a photo...but don't try it in Pisa, Italy, or a dilapidated shed that's falling down!
George
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 03:09 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: I can be found railfanning the abandoned B&O Northern Sub.
Posts: 1,461
|
It actually looks plumb to me using the verts of the buildings and light poles, etc., but the bridge gives an unlevel illusion and doesn't help the fact that the locos are on a curve and may be slightly canted. Curious for other opinions on this one.
__________________
A Picture Is Worth 1000 Words. A Memory Is Worth 1000 Pictures.
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 03:50 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hilldale, West Virginia
Posts: 3,878
|
Weird.
When I zoom way in, the right side especially the upper corner on the right is off about .5 to .75 CCW, but the left side is pretty near level throughout. I guess it could be some lens related distortion. I'm not familiar with the Nikon lenses well enough to say. The photo was taken @ 72mm... what lens was it?
I would throw this shot in photoshop and do some perspective adjustments on the right side, and you should be good to go.
Loyd L.
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 06:00 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 197
|
Lense is a Nikon 55-200
Thanks Lloyd and all
The lense is a Nikon 55-200. I'll play around with the image and if needed just slightly rotate CCW
Thanks
DB
|
|
|
03-08-2012, 03:53 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
That shot is closer to perfectly level than probably 50% of the shots in the database!
|
|
|
03-09-2012, 11:13 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 381
|
I think what the reviewer may be looking at is the lack of sky on the left. The hill, Denver ain't flat ...
|
|
|
03-10-2012, 12:27 AM
|
#9
|
A dude with a camera
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 7,928
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BUFFIE
|
You need to appeal that sucker!
|
|
|
03-10-2012, 12:42 AM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog
You need to appeal that sucker!
|
Agreed. THE worst unlevel rejection that's ever been posted here.
|
|
|
03-10-2012, 07:50 AM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 197
|
I added just a bit more and it was accepted.
It works......
 | PhotoID: 391568 Photograph © BUFFIE |
Thanks guys!
|
|
|
03-11-2012, 12:19 AM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
Now the bridge support and the building on the left are leaning slightly to the left.
Either way, it still looks fine, Buf.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:10 AM.
|