Old 12-27-2003, 10:19 PM   #1
CR4100
Junior Member
 
CR4100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 9
Default What makes this one more popular?

I posted several pictures yesterday, including one of my favorites of all time.

Here is the better photo: http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=43917 It well lit, scenic and has some interesting power. I have an

Here is the other: http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=43908 It's a tight location and most of the train is hidden in the shadows. I even seem to have cut off most of the bridge.

I looked today and the CP photo received 34 views and the crappy Soo shot has 63 views. I'm baffled. What are people seeing that makes the Soo picture more popular. In the thumbnail version you cannot see the dust in the sky of the CP shot. [I plan to correct the blemishes and re-submit this one]
CR4100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2003, 01:51 AM   #2
Guilford350
Senior Member
 
Guilford350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Terryville, CT
Posts: 542
Default

Both are very good photos. I, personally, like the SOO one better mainly because of the angle. Its not too often you get see and overhead angle like that.
Guilford350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2003, 07:11 AM   #3
Lord Vader
Senior Member
 
Lord Vader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 135
Default

Being a CPR in New England junkie, you can pretty well guess my choice. I appreciate anyone who had the patience and tenacity to take the time to shoot the CP on its New England lines. THAT was a challenge!
Lord Vader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2003, 03:47 AM   #4
Save The Wave
trainchaser.us
 
Save The Wave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Evansville IN
Posts: 357
Send a message via MSN to Save The Wave
Default

Perhaps the name recognition of the SOO?
__________________
You give me a golf cart, a 12 pack and a lake, I'll show you how to have fun all day - Comedian Greg Hahn

The good, the bad and the ugly. My railpics
Save The Wave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2004, 11:51 PM   #5
iCe
Senior Member
 
iCe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 475
Send a message via MSN to iCe
Default

I also think it was the unusual angle of the SOO shot.
__________________
iCe - <A HREF="http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?offset=0&where=search|-2|-2|-2||-2||15|1||||||||-2|-2||-2|-2|||15|-2|1239||||&newsort=2" target="_blank">My RailPictures.Net Photos

http://members.rogers.com/will2004/Banner.jpg</A>
iCe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2004, 01:18 AM   #6
Hobo0628
Junior Member
 
Hobo0628's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh,PA
Posts: 11
Default

I personally like the SOO shot more than the other. Even though the train is in the shadows, it adds to the picture. It is also a very "strange" angle.
Hobo0628 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2004, 01:23 AM   #7
arnstg
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lisle,Il.
Posts: 12
Default

This is a no brainer for me. Standing by the tracks and get a head on photo at an angle of 10-30 degrees off center from the loco, can be done by almost anyone. To get an overhead shot of the Soo requires creativity and some planning to get this kind of shot. Congrats on your 2nd shot.

There is more to rail photography than catching the front of a loco but also including the environment where the photo is taken. Look thru Trains Magazine or others and see what pictures you study and which ones you scan quickly without a second thought to give you some ideas.

Regards, Jerry
arnstg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2004, 05:02 AM   #8
wurstm
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 19
Send a message via AIM to wurstm
Default

I think that the CP shot would have potentially been more attractive if it had been in color. Having that much foliage thick foliage would have made the units "jump out" more, but as b&w, the tonalities between the units and the foliage are too similar. The composition in the SOO line shot works very well, regardless of b&w or color.

Don't feel bad - I have the same problem. At the time I'm writing this, the following image (which I've had posted for a couple of months now) is just below 100 hits:
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=37991
Yet any Chessie System roster shots I post almost always gets at least twice as many hits. Its hard to figure out what the typical railfan is looking for in a photo, but it seems that the more artistic I get, the less interested they are.


Mark
__________________
Mark S. Wurst
www.mswphoto.com
www.idiotrailfan.com
wurstm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2004, 06:12 AM   #9
arnstg
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lisle,Il.
Posts: 12
Default

This is a great photo. It beats all the wedge shots I see on here with no thought of composition. Unfortunately, probably not that many people
search on "Erie" so that it hasn't been viewed that much. I am guilty since I have my own preferences on what I search for. I am always glad to see any photo that catches my eye and I will stop and view instead of just clicking past it.

Keep up the good work. jerry
arnstg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2004, 09:47 AM   #10
Robert28
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Loudon, TN
Posts: 43
Default

I can see the merits of both shots but the SOO one is definatly the more unique of the two. It is definatly an unusual angle. As to what makes one more popular than another? I've about given up trying to figure that one out with my own.

Robert
__________________
Click Here to view my photos at RailPictures.Net!
Robert28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2004, 02:10 AM   #11
Chris Starnes
Administrator
 
Chris Starnes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 927
Default

I have had this conversation with quite a few people and have come to the conclusion the average railfan would rather see a wedge/roster than they would something creative or 'pretty'!

Having said that, it depends on what you want to do (or who you want to impress) with your photos....

I wouldn't think about the views as being such a big issue. The way I look at it, if someone who's opinion I respect likes a photo and takes time to view it, I am very happy. I would rather have 5 people look at a photo who are looking at it for the artistic/photographic intent than I would have 50 people just looking at it to see another "train picture."

CTS
(live from Flagstaff, AZ)
__________________
Chris Starnes
Co-Editor, RailPictures.net
Chris Starnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2004, 11:32 PM   #12
chris crook
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Zanesville Ohio
Posts: 246
Default

I like both pictures very much, although I think they would have been well served by color. But if it wasn't available, then such is life.

I look at a lot of pictures as thumbs. If I see something really good, I 'vote' by giving it a view. But plenty of pictures can see seen fairly well by looking at the thumbs here. Want to get a lot of page views? Put up a picture with lots of locomotives in it. That seems to get them clicking.
chris crook is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.