Old 06-30-2005, 07:50 AM   #1
milepost 48.1
Member
 
milepost 48.1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: internets
Posts: 46
Send a message via AIM to milepost 48.1
Default A couple more rejections

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=141197 - bad cropping
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=141195 - bad angle

So, are any of these worth trying to fix?
__________________
the lunch consisted of a meat-like substance whose flavor defied description

Rail pics:
http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=706
milepost 48.1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2005, 08:50 AM   #2
Ru1056
Senior Member
 
Ru1056's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Indianapolis IN
Posts: 438
Send a message via Yahoo to Ru1056
Default

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=141197

On this one try cropping the sky and maybe a bit off of the left.

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=141195

Don't know what else you can do with this one.
__________________
Billy

JREB.ORG. Moderated discussion forums about NS & CSX

Remember the ugly photo god.
Ru1056 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2005, 09:20 AM   #3
milepost 48.1
Member
 
milepost 48.1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: internets
Posts: 46
Send a message via AIM to milepost 48.1
Default

thanks, I'll give that a try.

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=141198

I also have to mention this one, because it was rejected for "Poor lighting (Cloudy): Common angle cloudy day shots of common/standard power
are generally not accepted" and "Obstructing Objects (Foreground Clutter)." Now while I can agree with the "foreground clutter" (but hey, it's a lift bridge, what do you expect), that was shot in full sun, and there wasn't a cloud in sight. I could interpret that as meaning the lighting is just bad because the angle of the sun was too high, but the screener didn't write that, he said it was "cloudy." I've had a few other shots rejected for the same exact reason when the photo was shot in full sun, and it's really starting to bug me.
__________________
the lunch consisted of a meat-like substance whose flavor defied description

Rail pics:
http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=706
milepost 48.1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2005, 12:59 PM   #4
ssw9662
Senior Member
 
ssw9662's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 839
Default

Next time you go to that location, cut off the girder and see what happens.
__________________
Austin
Canon EOS 7D
Canon 70-200mm f/4 L
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM
Canon 50mm f/1.8
My Railpictures.net Photos
flickr
ssw9662 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2005, 01:31 PM   #5
Ru1056
Senior Member
 
Ru1056's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Indianapolis IN
Posts: 438
Send a message via Yahoo to Ru1056
Default

Also, the photos all looked washed out to me. Maybe more saturation would help. Sorry, I couldn't access the website for some reason earlier.
__________________
Billy

JREB.ORG. Moderated discussion forums about NS & CSX

Remember the ugly photo god.
Ru1056 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2005, 03:10 PM   #6
Guilford350
Senior Member
 
Guilford350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Terryville, CT
Posts: 542
Default

I would crop the dead space on the left.
Guilford350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.