Old 12-09-2006, 08:47 AM   #1
andy buckley
Member
 
andy buckley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
Posts: 72
Default Bad angle rejection

...at least it's not for 'poor quality' this time. But I had another similar photo accepted before (although different loco), so.... any advice/comments appreciated - thanks, Andy

andy buckley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2006, 12:56 AM   #2
becker
Louis Becker
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 390
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andy buckley
...at least it's not for 'poor quality' this time. But I had another similar photo accepted before (although different loco), so.... any advice/comments appreciated - thanks, Andy

I like the pic, but I think it would have been better had you shown the whole locomotive. The pic also looks slightly unlevel.

Do you have other photos similar to these besides the one that was already accepted? Those might have a better chance of getting in.

~Louis Becker
becker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2006, 01:37 AM   #3
Switched out
Senior Member
 
Switched out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 395
Default

Hi Andy,

You could also try cropping the bottom and left side of the image to tighten up on the worker assisting with the coaling.

Also was this taken with the same camera you where having problems with in another thread recently?

Cheers,

Christine
Switched out is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2006, 02:02 AM   #4
a231pacific
Senior Member
 
a231pacific's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 822
Default

Andy,

I took a couple of cracks at your photo. One using Christine's suggestion of focusing on the worker, but unless your original photo resolution was fairly high, this degree of crop may not leave you enough image quality.

The second version is a tighter horizontal crop, keeping the cab so you know which engine it is. I also corrected the perspective a bit on both versions. If you look at your original shot, the two poles on either side of the photo are both angling out towards the edge. This is due to your position looking down and it being a wide angle shot. If you have photo shop, it's an easy fix. I also cropped the left one out, which I think improves the shot.

I also increased your saturation a bit to brighten up the colours and also sharpened it a bit.

Michael Allen

Last edited by a231pacific; 12-10-2006 at 02:06 AM.
a231pacific is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2006, 10:30 AM   #5
alan-crotty
Senior Member
 
alan-crotty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ashford Kent England
Posts: 349
Default Crop

Andy,

I was just about to crop your shot when Michael beat me to it, They're fast in Michigan ! I would have cropped it about the same. There's a bit too much in the original phot so the viewer has a problem latching onto the subject.

Always ensure your phots have straight horizons/verticals that's probably one of the major reasons for rejection on this database.

Alan
alan-crotty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2006, 09:21 PM   #6
andy buckley
Member
 
andy buckley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
Posts: 72
Default

I was having a go at an alternative crop before I read your responses (thanks) - it's attached below. I wanted to try and portray a busy loco yard at the end of the day with engines arriving and being got ready for the next days working. That's why I had tried to include 'Bodmin' - the light pacific in the background.

Here's a general panning shot of the yard so you can see how busy it was (wmv format taken with my s602 - and 'Yes', Christine, - these were with the same camera I was having problems with in the other thread recently ).
If you look at the film you can see that, unfortunately, from my vantage point, it isn't possible to include a whole loco whilst being coaled - I don't have a wide enough lens. I've gone for a slightly different crop from the one's Alan and Michael suggested.

btw am I right in thinking that 800x600 is an accepted size for rp.net?

andyb
Attached Images
File Type: jpg coaling black5b.JPG (138.9 KB, 204 views)
andy buckley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2006, 03:20 AM   #7
Switched out
Senior Member
 
Switched out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 395
Default

Andy, attached is my suggestion for cropping.

In regard to the image quality of the photo I see significant improvement from the HST photo posted in the other thread. In my cropped suggestion I also increased the colour saturation and the contrast slightly and sharpened.

800x600 is an accepted resolution I believe.

Cheers,

Christine.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 45231coaling.JPG.82597PSrw.jpg (103.0 KB, 204 views)
Switched out is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 03:44 AM   #8
a231pacific
Senior Member
 
a231pacific's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 822
Default

Andy,

As usual, I think Christine has the better crop! The BR logo on the tender is a slightly out of focus and on your tighter horizontal crop it becomes a bit too obvious. Backing off helps. Her version still keeps the focus on the worker and less on the engine.

As to acceptable photo sizes for RP, 800 X 600 is the minimum. 1024 X 683 is the preferred size.

Michael Allen
a231pacific is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 09:31 AM   #9
andy buckley
Member
 
andy buckley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
Posts: 72
Default It got on!!

Yay!! - I emulated Christine's crop and 'tweaks' as best I could in PSP and it was accepted!



with a 'Fine Work!' comment from The Screener (many thanks!)

Thanks for your help and advice folks - especially Christine!

btw how do you reference RP.net images so they appear in the text?

andyb
andy buckley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 12:51 PM   #10
CG_F45
Senior Member
 
CG_F45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 413
Thumbs up

Excelent shot!

To make it appear in text, follow this format,

[photoid=xxxxxx]

The X's are the photo's 6 digit ID Number, so...

Image © Andy Buckley
PhotoID: 168197
Photograph © Andy Buckley


Or just quote me to see it done, hope this helps!

Again, nice shot
__________________
Chris G

My photos at RailPictures.Net
CG_F45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 01:00 PM   #11
andy buckley
Member
 
andy buckley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
Posts: 72
Thumbs up

Thanks Chris - easy when you know how!

Andy
andy buckley is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.