Old 02-19-2008, 06:27 PM   #1
apm2754
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 42
Default Would like your opinions....

Hello,

I'm fairly new here and I just got my 1st photo posted(!)

http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=223852

However, the 1st time I submitted it, it was rejected for being under exposed. I don't have a problem with the screeners wanting it exposed more and it was no big deal to play with it in Photoshop, but I think the original submission that was rejected was better. Being less exposed really brought out the contrast in the lighting in the station roof & made the background trains blend more, while keeping the foreground train still clear. What do you guys think? I'd love to hear some opinions of those who know better than me...

The rejected photo, which I like better:

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...&key=934696266

Andy

Last edited by apm2754; 02-19-2008 at 09:59 PM.
apm2754 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2008, 08:29 PM   #2
JRMDC
Senior Member
 
JRMDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
Default

I've faced that situation. What makes it particularly hard to me is that, if I am working the picture, say, a few weeks later, it is hard to judge what level of brightness is the most correctly representational, when the difference is subtle.

I think that the "corrected" photo is more pleasing to the eye, but I suspect the original is a more accurate representation of reality, based on some (very old!) recollections of the insides of such terminals.

Oh, and congrats, and welcome!
__________________
My RP pix are here.
My Flickr pix are here.

My commentaries on rail pictures are in my blog.

RP Photo Albums:
Cabooses
Engine Details
Farm and Train
Plumes!
Railroad Details
Signal Details
Switchstand Shots
JRMDC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2008, 09:14 PM   #3
socalrailfan
Master Railfan
 
socalrailfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 714
Default

I noticed the same thing with a shot I had rejected then approved today. The approved one was much darker than the original and the way it actually was. Do I have a problem with that? Hmm, not sure right now.

Image © Dave Toussaint
PhotoID: 223865
Photograph © Dave Toussaint


http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...d=485221&key=0
__________________
Thanks,
Dave
www.SoCalRailFan.com
See more of my train photos at:
http://community.webshots.com/user/firehouse16
See my train videos at:
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=SoCalRailFan
socalrailfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2008, 09:48 PM   #4
apm2754
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 42
Default

Dave, on yours I like the accepted/darker one better, myself. The sky looks less washed out & the clouds have more definition. On mine, the darker one represented more of what my eye saw. The stark contrast between the middle of the roof truss and the lit edges was dramatic to me, and what made me want to take the picture. Alas, the screeners did not agree.
apm2754 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.