Old 04-30-2013, 06:12 AM   #1
Senior Member
StL-rail's Avatar
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hastings, MN
Posts: 308
Send a message via AIM to StL-rail Send a message via MSN to StL-rail Send a message via Yahoo to StL-rail
Default Poor esthetic quality?


I thought it was pretty good, any ideas on this one folks? I could appeal, but I'm not really sure what to say...

Click Here to view my photos at RailPictures.Net!

-Canadian Pacific Conductor
-Union Pacific Conductor
-RRC Switchman
StL-rail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2013, 07:54 AM   #2
Senior Member
Ween's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,861

It could be a rejection to protect you or the crew from any sort of retribution since it was taken on a moving train. Granted, the statute of limitations may be expired, but the dirty window isn't helping things!
Ween is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2013, 02:10 PM   #3
Senior Member
JRMDC's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202

There are out-the-cab moving-train shots on RP, so I don't think that is the reason. The dirty window does not help, the mess at the bottom, especially the bottom right corner, does not help. It's not very sharp either, and as a result I suspect my inclination to do a tighter vertical to put more emphasis on the grain elevator would fail.
My RP pix are here.
My Flickr pix are here.

My commentaries on rail pictures are in my blog.

RP Photo Albums:
Engine Details
Farm and Train
Railroad Details
Signal Details
Switchstand Shots
JRMDC is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.