Old 03-18-2008, 02:37 AM   #1
KevinM
Senior Member
 
KevinM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,119
Question Need a Nikon walking around lens....

Folks,

I bought a new Nikon D40x last fall and have only been out shooting 3 times so far. I shoot steam and that's pretty scarce in the winter. I have the 18-55mm kit lens and a 55-200mm VR lens, but I've discovered I'm changing lenses wayyyyy too often. I thought about just ditching what I have and getting the 18-200mm VR zoom, but I probably couldn't get much for my current lenses even though they're nearly new. I was thinking of perhaps going with the 18-135mm kit lens to give me more overlap with my existing VR zoom. Trouble is, I've heard bad things about the autofocus on the 18-135.

Does anyone have any experience with the Nikon 18-135mm zoom? It can be had for less than half the price of the 18-200 VR. Is the 18-200 VR really the beat-all-end-all? At a recent Nevada Northern shoot, I noticed that most of the Nikonians there had the latter....perhaps there's a message there.

Thoughts?

Kevin
KevinM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2008, 02:42 AM   #2
a231pacific
Senior Member
 
a231pacific's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 822
Default

Kevin, for a one lens set up, the 18-200 VR is hard to beat, but it does have some irritating features. There is almost no zoom damping, so if you tilt the camera down, even a little bit, it starts creeping out to full extension.

Before I got the 18-200 I had been using the 24-120 VR that I had been using on my film camera. That works out to be a 35-180 when used on the Nikon 1.5 factor digital. It's discontinued but you should be able to find it fairly cheaply. I'm kind of sorry now that I let mine go. It looks just like the 18-200 but does not creep!

Michael Allen
a231pacific is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2008, 04:51 PM   #3
ddavies
Senior Member
 
ddavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 381
Default

Get a second body. I keep a 18-70 on one, and a 70-200 VR on the other.
ddavies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2008, 10:27 PM   #4
Cyclonetrain
Senior Member
 
Cyclonetrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Posts: 359
Send a message via AIM to Cyclonetrain Send a message via Yahoo to Cyclonetrain
Default

I picked up an 18-135mm lens after I smashed the hell out of my 18-55mm (long story). Picture quality is top notch. On most pictures 8x10 and smaller, and on most computer applications, I cant tell the difference between it and my 50mm. Build quality is average, I wouldn't expect it to survive a 6 foot fall (just like my kit lens didn't) and I always use a clear filter. Lens hood is worthless, clunky and cheap, and just gets in the way. If you're on a budget, get it, but if you have $700, I'd go for the 18-200mm VR.

P.S. All my pictures on my RP.net account taken since May 07 have been with it, except for maybe one with the Nikon 70-300mm AF-G.
Cyclonetrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.