Go Back   RailPictures.Net Forums > Railroad Photography Forums > Digital Photo Processing Forum

View Poll Results: How do you like the tone mapping done here?
Tone mapping good. 3 50.00%
Tone mapping bad. 2 33.33%
You Hicks'd / Dewitz'd it to death. 1 16.67%
Voters: 6. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-03-2013, 05:56 AM   #1
Ween
Senior Member
 
Ween's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,861
Default Tone Mapping

So I was messing around last night looking up different techniques in Photoshop and came across tone mapping. I use Photoshop CS2 and was looking at these tutorials:
http://www.dpchallenge.com/tutorial.php?TUTORIAL_ID=60
http://backingwinds.blogspot.com/200...dr-images.html

So naturally I had to try it out. Take a look at the attached images, the top one is done with my normal workflow and the bottom one is the one using the techniques in the tone mapping tutorials.

What do you think? Is the tone mapped one too Candyland'ish? Is it better than the non-tone mapped one? Anyone else use tone mapping as part of their normal workflow?

Name:  ARR 3009 Bird Creek Jul 26 12.jpg
Views: 326
Size:  944.8 KB

Name:  ARR 3009 Bird Creek Jul 26 12 TM.jpg
Views: 233
Size:  975.3 KB
__________________

Last edited by Ween; 02-03-2013 at 05:58 AM.
Ween is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 11:55 AM   #2
JimThias
Senior Member
 
JimThias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,795
Default

I'd rather just hit it with a subtle use of the shadow/highlights tool and call it a day. Do whatever works the best for you, though.
JimThias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 12:59 PM   #3
JRMDC
Senior Member
 
JRMDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
Default

You only made subtle changes. This has nothing to do with Hicksanity.
__________________
My RP pix are here.
My Flickr pix are here.

My commentaries on rail pictures are in my blog.

RP Photo Albums:
Cabooses
Engine Details
Farm and Train
Plumes!
Railroad Details
Signal Details
Switchstand Shots
JRMDC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 02:47 PM   #4
Mgoldman
Senior Member
 
Mgoldman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,632
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMDC View Post
You only made subtle changes. This has nothing to do with Hicksanity.
I concur - however, I'll add - anytime one experiments with such a technique, a good cure is to create a separate layer (just copy the original over the new questionable technique and then blend them to a point which does not it justice. This works great in keeping HDR's from going overboard.

Tone mapping is great for bringing back details - especially in snow but it introduces quite a bit of noise very quickly.

/Mitch
Mgoldman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 03:00 PM   #5
JRMDC
Senior Member
 
JRMDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
Default

I am in one of those moods where I think everyone is right ...

There is a big range between a bit of shadows adjustment and full-blown HDR to the max. I think in this case Chris hasn't gone very far beyond shadows adjustment, if he has gone at all beyond. I am a fan of using tone mapping judiciously, in that I don't care about the technique, I just like to see shots processed exactly to my personal tastes. Which is what everyone should do. Right? Right?

Layers are always good, I need to be less lazy and use them more often.
__________________
My RP pix are here.
My Flickr pix are here.

My commentaries on rail pictures are in my blog.

RP Photo Albums:
Cabooses
Engine Details
Farm and Train
Plumes!
Railroad Details
Signal Details
Switchstand Shots
JRMDC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 03:12 PM   #6
Mgoldman
Senior Member
 
Mgoldman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,632
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMDC View Post
I am in one of those moods where I think everyone is right ... AND... I want to correct a horrible injustice and state as a matter of fact that I fully support and secretly have always supported the inclusion of Mitch's "Dog on a Train" photo. It is a true work of art.
(Opportunity knocks)

Thanks J!

/Mitch
Mgoldman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 04:57 PM   #7
bigbassloyd
Senior Member
 
bigbassloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hilldale, West Virginia
Posts: 3,603
Default

I think I'm with Jim. Looks to be a bit more effort to basically end up with a s/h adjustment look.

Loyd L.
__________________
Social Media elevates the absurd and mediocre to a point where they aren't anymore, and that is a tragedy.

My personal photography site
bigbassloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 07:50 PM   #8
trainboysd40
Senior Member
 
trainboysd40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta on the CP Laggan Subdivision
Posts: 2,048
Send a message via MSN to trainboysd40
Default

I don't tone map. I did it once. Never again. I should be a separate option on the poll =(

Anyways, in my Hicksian manner, some things on your tone-mapped image that I try to avoid:
  • The mountain at left is unnaturally brightened compared with the rest of the scene
  • The highlights inside of the lightened shadows are too bright, try to bring up the shadows to give them some luminosity without making them look like they've got a second light source
  • The mountains across the inlet got too blue.
__________________
got a D5 IIi and now he doesnt afread fo 12800 iSO
Youtube (Model Railway, Vlogs, Tutorials, and prototype)
My Website
Obligatory link to shots on RP, HERE
trainboysd40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 09:12 PM   #9
JRMDC
Senior Member
 
JRMDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mgoldman View Post
(Opportunity knocks)

Thanks J!

/Mitch
Mitch, that is as fake as Hicks-style tone mapping!
__________________
My RP pix are here.
My Flickr pix are here.

My commentaries on rail pictures are in my blog.

RP Photo Albums:
Cabooses
Engine Details
Farm and Train
Plumes!
Railroad Details
Signal Details
Switchstand Shots
JRMDC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 04:06 AM   #10
Joe the Photog
Senior Member
 
Joe the Photog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 7,885
Default

Too bad tone mapping can't place the train in the frame better.



The differences are subtle, but I do prefer the top one. It looks less unreal (didn't want to say fake) but that could be because you said the bottom one was tonemapped. I did a bit of tonemapping a few years ago but it always seemed that everything I was doing could be better done in Elements with Shadows and Highlight.
__________________
Joe the Photog Dot Com
Joe the Photog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 04:14 AM   #11
trainboysd40
Senior Member
 
trainboysd40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta on the CP Laggan Subdivision
Posts: 2,048
Send a message via MSN to trainboysd40
Default

You are all heartless bastards.
__________________
got a D5 IIi and now he doesnt afread fo 12800 iSO
Youtube (Model Railway, Vlogs, Tutorials, and prototype)
My Website
Obligatory link to shots on RP, HERE
trainboysd40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 05:59 AM   #12
JRMDC
Senior Member
 
JRMDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
Default

Oops, my apologies to Mr. Hicks, he of the Hicksian post-processing technique. I somehow missed your post despite its presence right before mine.

But I have poked around some and, alas, confirmed that I was undereducated on HDR vs tone mapping. Although, in the end, I think it makes no difference.

So, loosely and curtly speaking, HDR is about capturing max tonal range and tone mapping is about squishing tonal range into the (narrower dynamic range) medium in which you want to display an image.

For our purposes, defined for now as putting an image onto RP, is there a difference? The jpg itself limits the DR, we capture as much dynamic range as possible through some technique (HDR, pseudo HDR), and we save it into a narrow range format (JPG). Seems to me like we are doing both at the same time. So what is tone mapping, and how it is different than HDR or shadows, please?

PS: this is an interesting discussion: http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...d.php?t=851235
This is a key point for me, from the first post: "Every digital image - HDR or not - needs to be tone-mapped"
__________________
My RP pix are here.
My Flickr pix are here.

My commentaries on rail pictures are in my blog.

RP Photo Albums:
Cabooses
Engine Details
Farm and Train
Plumes!
Railroad Details
Signal Details
Switchstand Shots

Last edited by JRMDC; 02-04-2013 at 06:04 AM.
JRMDC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 01:12 PM   #13
JimThias
Senior Member
 
JimThias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,795
Default

Quote:
Generally, tone mapping is used in conjunction with a High Dynamic Range (HDR) process. The HDR process normally requires multiple exposures of an image. However, this tutorial requires only one exposure of an image to emulate true tone mapping. In some circles, this process is also known as “16-32-16 Tone Mapping”.
I feel so left out not being in one of those circles.

JimThias is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.