10-02-2013, 04:09 AM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 168
|
Cropping Help
Folks,
I am unsure how to crop this one. It doesn't abide by the rule of thirds, but I didn't want to cut out the bridge pillars and the river. Where should I go with this?
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...02&key=2810963
|
|
|
10-02-2013, 02:40 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hilldale, West Virginia
Posts: 3,878
|
I would have went either up or down from there and reshot it.
The bridge is still cut off, and the poles kill it.
Loyd L.
|
|
|
10-02-2013, 03:14 PM
|
#3
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In the California Republic
Posts: 2,774
|
It is savable, just get rid of most of the right side.
|
|
|
10-02-2013, 03:53 PM
|
#4
|
A dude with a camera
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 7,928
|
All the dead space on the left side actually kills it for me, but it could use some cropping on the top and bottom too. The pole sticking up out of the back does not help. Since I guess the thing is moving away from us, do you have an earlier frame which would make the pole less obtrusive.
|
|
|
10-02-2013, 08:38 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 168
|
This is the other one that I have to work with.
|
|
|
10-02-2013, 09:54 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,268
|
I'd say go with the 2nd one. By the way, I think I see a red tint to the whole picture.
|
|
|
10-02-2013, 10:47 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 168
|
|
|
|
10-02-2013, 10:55 PM
|
#8
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 185
|
Either photo could benefit from cropping from the left and top. Second photo doesn't have the power pole growing out of the caboose. And believe it or not, if it doesn't comply with the Rule of Thirds, nobody's going to take you away in the dead of night.
|
|
|
10-02-2013, 11:34 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 168
|
Haha well Bob I'm still cherry in that respect. I'm used to a society of rules and I don't know any better!
Perhaps you all could help me understand why they PEQ'ed it. Surely it can't be because the gentleman's face is visible?
Last edited by JMC; 10-03-2013 at 01:02 AM.
|
|
|
10-03-2013, 03:04 AM
|
#10
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 185
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMC
I'm used to a society of rules and I don't know any better! 
|
Try it. You might just like it.
It's a nice photo. I have no idea why they rejected it. I certainly hope it's not because you caught the attention of the guy in the hardhat. I forgot to say - love the flags.
|
|
|
10-03-2013, 03:42 AM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 168
|
Thank you Bob. Perhaps I'll play screener roulette in a few days and see where it goes. I'm going to give it one last try with a watercolor filter...
|
|
|
10-03-2013, 05:06 AM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 168
|
I tried another view, but I don't think they're fans of the ass end of a ditch cleaner. There's a few in the database of rail grinder rear ends, but maybe I'm the only one that finds this as neat. Maybe it IS the flags they dislike
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...46&key=1985625
|
|
|
10-03-2013, 11:38 AM
|
#13
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 185
|
You could crop much tighter. If you had a frame from an angle that shows better what's going on, even better.
|
|
|
10-03-2013, 01:31 PM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,268
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMC
|
Open door.
|
|
|
10-03-2013, 04:12 PM
|
#15
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In the California Republic
Posts: 2,774
|
Perhaps someone knows that the worker is supposed to be wearing safety glasses and he is not.
I don't see any other rules violations.
Sit on it a month and try again.
|
|
|
10-04-2013, 05:11 AM
|
#17
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In the California Republic
Posts: 2,774
|
Well, I don't see the difference between these two and yours.
MOW crap  | PhotoID: 439595 Photograph © EL ROCO Photography |
and guys riding the shove.
 | PhotoID: 303288 Photograph © EL ROCO Photography |
|
|
|
10-04-2013, 01:30 PM
|
#18
|
A dude with a camera
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 7,928
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMC
|
Hha. 4600+ views later, I say it made it. When I first saw it, I wondered what the heck you were doing trying to get the bridge shots on. The accepted one is a really good shot.
Of course, like HG, I don't see the difference between it and this one
 | PhotoID: Photograph © |
|
|
|
10-04-2013, 03:37 PM
|
#19
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,268
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog
Of course, like HG, I don't see the difference between it and this one
 | PhotoID: Photograph © |
|
Maybe it has something to do with the fact that yours and HG's shove pics are actual trains, not MOW? Not a problem for me, just guessing.
|
|
|
10-04-2013, 04:11 PM
|
#20
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 168
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog
Hha. 4600+ views later, I say it made it. When I first saw it, I wondered what the heck you were doing trying to get the bridge shots on. The accepted one is a really good shot.
Of course, like HG, I don't see the difference between it and this one
 | PhotoID: Photograph © |
|
Thank you Joe. I think I was too hung up on the lighting with this one to see anything else.
|
|
|
10-04-2013, 04:17 PM
|
#21
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 168
|
In the case of the two rejected photos, I would say it is based upon the taste of an individual, not the viewers. As always I appreciate the feedback and encouragement.
|
|
|
10-07-2013, 05:02 AM
|
#22
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 379
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog
Hha. 4600+ views later, I say it made it. When I first saw it, I wondered what the heck you were doing trying to get the bridge shots on. The accepted one is a really good shot.
Of course, like HG, I don't see the difference between it and this one
|
Larry's Truck and Electric isn't visible in yours.
-Jacques
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:29 AM.
|