10-09-2013, 02:03 AM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
top bottom left right anything but middle
can't crop the middle, after all!
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...60&key=7278099
I have some thoughts but don't trust them. I like it as it is, actually - surprise, surprise, wouldn't have uploaded it otherwise - but looking for fresh perspective.
|
|
|
10-09-2013, 02:25 AM
|
#2
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,333
|
You are not going to like my suggestion, but to "get it on", do a vertical crop.
Barring that, I would take some off the right and bottom.
|
|
|
10-09-2013, 02:27 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,674
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMDC
can't crop the middle, after all!
|
I disagree - I'm not a fan of the freight car nor the ugly white building.
I would do just that - crop the middle.
/Mitch
|
|
|
10-09-2013, 02:29 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,674
|
If you're not into that - I'd crop the top - the sky isn't your friend and the crop is a bit "tall". Vertical, better yet.
/Mitch
|
|
|
10-09-2013, 02:35 AM
|
#5
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,333
|
Here you go, I added a couple other "fixes" while I was at it.
|
|
|
10-09-2013, 02:53 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
Harrumph, I say!  But I do see the value of the vertical approach, thanks.
|
|
|
10-09-2013, 01:37 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,119
|
Like Mitch, I am not in love with some of the elements (notably the dump truck) in this shot. Troy's suggestion of doing a vertical crop is one possibility. Another is going 4:5 and cropping down if you have the MPs.
|
|
|
10-09-2013, 01:48 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hilldale, West Virginia
Posts: 3,878
|
I'd reshoot on a better weather day..
Loyd L.
|
|
|
10-09-2013, 02:19 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
Kevin, I'm a fan of verticals more than most but I don't care for the ones proposed here. Too ordinary, just engine and trees, cloudy/common to me. So I much prefer your approach, because it keeps more of the scene, and I will work on that.
As for the "elements", pretty is pretty and this isn't it, and that doesn't bother me so much - because, regrettably, I seem to run into it all the time.  But I understand the issue with respect to its general appeal.
Loyd, ha ha. Actually, it is an interesting question of what sort of weather is best for shooting a northbound train that runs only at 11:30am, so no beginning/end of day side light. I happened to get stuck with dark overcast, maybe light overcast? I'd say a snowy day with light overcast. Not much possibility of that, and frankly this location isn't so wonderful that I am going to seek out other opportunities.
|
|
|
10-09-2013, 03:23 PM
|
#10
|
Part-Time Railfan
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,381
|
That is a tough one. The MOW(?) car is a problem.
|
|
|
10-09-2013, 05:01 PM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
Hatch, I thought it was just a covered hopper, but it has some railings on top that don't look right, so I have no idea what it is for.
To me the bigger problem than the car - what's the problem, freight cars are along side the tracks in lots of places! - is that large plain gray wall on the left side.
Should I photoshop some graffiti on it?  A WM fireball herald?
Last edited by JRMDC; 10-09-2013 at 05:04 PM.
|
|
|
10-09-2013, 06:22 PM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hilldale, West Virginia
Posts: 3,878
|
I honestly think that if the composition or look of the image isn't extremely striking at first glance, the eyes find something to hate about it.
The hopper is the offender in this instance. I didn't notice the wall until you pointed it out.
Just cheapen yourself and go vertical.
Loyd L.
|
|
|
10-09-2013, 07:06 PM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbassloyd
Just cheapen yourself and go vertical.
Loyd L.
|
Or stick to principles and bury it on flickr for 15 views max!
But I just don't see why the hopper is so offensive. If I had time/inclination I'd look around and see if there are (at least somewhat) comparable shots on RP.
|
|
|
10-09-2013, 07:49 PM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMDC
Or stick to principles and bury it on flickr for 15 views max!
|
You definitely need to network more.
|
|
|
10-09-2013, 10:01 PM
|
#15
|
LA&SL Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 700
|
I'd let this one go. It looks like a cloudy day grab shot, and there really isn't much going for this scene. There's just too much distracting clutter and the light stinks. Even if you did manage to get it on, it really wouldn't add anything to your collection of photos on RP.
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 04:47 AM
|
#17
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 379
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMDC
Or stick to principles and bury it on flickr for 15 views max!
|
Not since Flickr started screwing with the ways views get counted.
I now get about four times more views on a daily basis than I did three or four months ago (and I haven't uploaded anything in quite some time.)
-Jacques
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 05:21 AM
|
#18
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In the California Republic
Posts: 2,774
|
Is the building on the hill in the upper left hand corner important?
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 02:36 PM
|
#19
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holloran Grade
Is the building on the hill in the upper left hand corner important?
|
In life? no idea
In the photo? Well, I do like showing that the city is not just flat. I suppose I could crop below the building but still above the row of houses on the hillside.
Anyway, I've set this one aside. The vert does not interest me much, and I decided it was time to let this one go.
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 04:16 PM
|
#20
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In the California Republic
Posts: 2,774
|
^^ It just seemed that it was an element that you wanted to show, so before I suggested a crop where it disappeared, I thought I would ask.
My personal take - this is not a really photogenic spot even with the city, a much closer crop would be the direction "I" would go, and in this instance, I would have opted for a ground level shot.
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 04:23 PM
|
#21
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holloran Grade
in this instance, I would have opted for a ground level shot.
|
The shot was not planned; I didn't even know of the spot. I had left the spot where I got the station departure shot and was taking a shortcut with intentions of heading on down the line when I ran across railfans on the bridge. To my surprise the train had not yet gotten to this point - they apparently did a second boarding for the rear cars on the train - so I had time to park and get back to this spot on the bridge. Got to see a very nice steam departure, although not a photogenic one.
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 04:28 PM
|
#22
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 168
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holloran Grade
My personal take - this is not a really photogenic spot even with the city, a much closer crop would be the direction "I" would go, and in this instance, I would have opted for a ground level shot.
|
That and a dollar will buy you a cup of coffee, since your shots are complete shit
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 04:43 PM
|
#23
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In the California Republic
Posts: 2,774
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMDC
The shot was not planned; .........
|
That too, seemed obvious based on your past work.
My close crop preference would be to get rid of as much as the background as possible.
Example:
 | PhotoID: 398332 Photograph © EL ROCO Photography |
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMC
That and a dollar will buy you a cup of coffee, since your shots are complete shit 
|
Nope, one look at me and they charge double, even at Dennys.
Last edited by Holloran Grade; 10-11-2013 at 04:51 PM.
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 11:58 PM
|
#24
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holloran Grade
My close crop preference would be to get rid of as much as the background as possible.
Example:
 | PhotoID: 398332 Photograph © EL ROCO Photography |
|
That's a roster shot. J shot a scene.
|
|
|
10-12-2013, 12:07 AM
|
#25
|
A dude with a camera
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 7,928
|
Any reason the steamer is so far back in the frame, J? If you shot it when it was closer to you, it might get rid of the distractions everyone keeps bringing up.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:04 AM.
|