10-11-2013, 05:15 AM
|
#1
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In the California Republic
Posts: 2,774
|
Comments we never get to see.
I would like to thank the anonymous person who attempted to leave the following comment on the picture below.
 | PhotoID: 454528 Photograph © EL ROCO Photography |
It is too bad that you choose to not identify yourself, as I would have enjoyed a full dissertation as to why "all my shots" are not just shit, but fall into the realm of "complete shit."
It really is too bad comments of such value are edited out of the comment field, as negative comments are often as important, if not more important to the artistic process than are positive ones.
BTW - I thought you didn't click on RP links.
* * * * *
EDITED COMMENT:
A photo comment has been added to one of your photos at RailPictures.Net!
Please check the information in the section below for additional
information!
Note: This is an automatically generated e-mail. Please do not respond to it,
as your response will be sent only to the 'admin@railpictures.net' e-mail
address, and not the person who submitted the comment itself. To reply to this
comment, please visit the photo, linked below, and post a followup comment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Photo URL: http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=454528
Comment: 'Your shots are complete shit. '
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Best Regards,
The RailPictures.Net Screening Team
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 05:21 AM
|
#2
|
Met Fan
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,043
|
A) Nice shot, I like it.
B) What exactly is the demarcation between shit and complete shit? Is not all shit, by its definition, a composite of multiple previously ingested items, and thus never completely all one thing, unless one's diet is absolutely singular (and even then of only an item that is not a composite of other materials)?
C) Good to see that screening process on comments is working.
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 05:27 AM
|
#3
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In the California Republic
Posts: 2,774
|
Philosophy 101
Well I am open to criticism, but just saying something is "complete shit" without anything more is of no consequence at all.
I mean, if a person cannot articulate why something is "complete shit," what is the value of their opinion?
Moreover, as you opined Charles, I fail to see a difference between just plain "shit," and something that is "complete shit."
Is shit not shit?
Or is shit something more?
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 05:52 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,024
|
Complete shit is made up of food that has been more thoroughly digested.
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 05:56 AM
|
#5
|
Met Fan
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,043
|
Of course, the poster may have been referring not to the item, but rather to the action - in which case only a complete one is satisfying.
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 05:57 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,024
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freericks
Of course, the poster may have been referring not to the item, but rather to the action - in which case only a complete one is satisfying.
|
Good point.
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 12:14 PM
|
#7
|
A dude with a camera
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 7,928
|
Have you considered leveling that shot, HG?
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 01:03 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 168
|
I must say...I envy your extensive fan base.
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 01:50 PM
|
#9
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,333
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freericks
C) Good to see that screening process on comments is working.
|
They scrutinize the shit out of mine, so I am suprised something like that got through.
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 02:19 PM
|
#10
|
Part-Time Railfan
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,381
|
Nice composition. Nice scene. Roco- you really like that sharpening tool don't you?
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 03:13 PM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hilldale, West Virginia
Posts: 3,878
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog
Have you considered leveling that shot, HG?
|
It's artistic!
Loyd L.
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 03:30 PM
|
#12
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In the California Republic
Posts: 2,774
|

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog
Have you considered leveling that shot, HG?
|
I leveled it with the side of the grain train cab nearest the left side of the image, out of curiosity, what part of the image would you level off?
Hint - the ground in the near horizon slopes to the right naturally.
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 04:54 PM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 168
|
For me, this photo hasn't "made it" until it's been added into the "Slutty Llama Anal Rape" album.
|
|
|
10-11-2013, 05:07 PM
|
#14
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In the California Republic
Posts: 2,774
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMC
For me, this photo hasn't "made it" until it's been added into the "Slutty Llama Anal Rape" album.
|
Oh, I forgot about the "Slutty Llama Anal Rape" album, and no, my shot is not in there yet.
I can only hope that it will soon be selected for such an auspicious honor.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatchetman
Roco- you really like that sharpening tool don't you?
|
The Devil, I mean the screeners make me do it.
Last edited by Holloran Grade; 10-11-2013 at 05:32 PM.
|
|
|
10-12-2013, 12:04 AM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holloran Grade
I leveled it with the side of the grain train cab nearest the left side of the image, out of curiosity, what part of the image would you level off?
|
You could always level it with the vertical on the nose of the closest loco, or level it with the vertical of the signal in the background. Both of those verticals are leaning to the right.
|
|
|
10-12-2013, 12:54 AM
|
#16
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In the California Republic
Posts: 2,774
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimThias
You could always level it with the vertical on the nose of the closest loco.....
|
Yes, that is what I used.
The front of the nearest loco is what the screeners seem to be attracted to, so that is what I usually use even when the background is about to fall over.
|
|
|
10-12-2013, 01:59 AM
|
#17
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
Looking at the vertical on the nose of that loco, it's still unlevel. It's leaning a little to the right.
|
|
|
10-12-2013, 04:52 AM
|
#18
|
Met Fan
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,043
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimThias
It's leaning a little to the right. 
|
Well, it is HG's photo.
|
|
|
10-16-2013, 09:12 PM
|
#19
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In the California Republic
Posts: 2,774
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freericks
Well, it is HG's photo.

|
Very good.
That is why you are so much fun to banter with.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:59 AM.
|