10-26-2017, 02:27 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 882
|
Cloudy Skies
CN Business train - the cars are obscured by curve, could have shot from overhead bridge and got more of train, less sky, but then would just have been train anywhere so went for station.
Cloudy skies, common power - I was a little surprised, not sure any rescue path.
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...20&key=7968936
Bob
|
|
|
10-26-2017, 04:01 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 291
|
I like the shot, clouds dont bother me, every day just is not sunny just ask the people in England. If it was not common power it would have had a chance. My last pic (#635341) on RP was a cloudy day, Im sure that the reason it got on was the C&O loco.
|
|
|
10-26-2017, 05:00 PM
|
#3
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,333
|
I have no clue what they consider cloudy and not cloudy anymore if you look at what gets in...
|
|
|
10-26-2017, 05:19 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hilldale, West Virginia
Posts: 3,878
|
No idea here either. Maybe a touch heavy contrast wise, but I think it's fine enough to be included.
Loyd L.
|
|
|
10-26-2017, 05:54 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 882
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbassloyd
No idea here either. Maybe a touch heavy contrast wise, but I think it's fine enough to be included.
Loyd L.
|
I agree with the contrast, probably a little too juiced up but I have noticed that trend on a blah day, I was going to back off a little. For me personally maybe what we talked about, really nice location and great looking train. I thought there were enough good elements.
Bob
Last edited by RobJor; 10-26-2017 at 05:57 PM.
|
|
|
10-26-2017, 06:44 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cleveland, Rochester, Erie
Posts: 432
|
Yeah it seems in my experience that cloudy shots are hit or miss on acceptance. Possibly different screeners? Really hard to say.
As for this particular shot, I think bringing up the shadows a bit might help, possibly with some selective editing if needed to keep from blowing out the sky.
|
|
|
10-26-2017, 06:55 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 534
|
Did you shoot a frame before the lead loco was obstructed by the crossing signal? I personally would like that better, and correcting other issues as suggested may setting yourself up for an obstruction rejection.
__________________
Doug Lilly
My RP Pics are HERE.
I've now got a Flickr. account, too.
|
|
|
10-26-2017, 07:30 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 882
|
Yes, many frames, was on rapid fire learned from past experience. Problem with earlier frame is the train is well back and the passenger part is even less noticed, good part is the station is featured more so could be way to go.
Bob
|
|
|
10-26-2017, 11:19 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,270
|
Maybe give this one less of a "heavy overcast" look.
|
|
|
10-26-2017, 11:35 PM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 794
|
I'm in agreement with those that like the shot though I would maybe like to see a bit more saturation/darkening of the red loco nose for a bit more visual impact. I don't have a problem with the crossing signal being where it is in relation to the loco either, though I realize a screener in dire need of a laxative might. It might be less obtrusive if it weren't on a slant, but you can't do anything about that. Something you can do is lose that creepy face on the sign peeking around the corner of the station!
__________________
Click Here to view my photos at RailPictures.Net!
Last edited by wds; 10-26-2017 at 11:39 PM.
|
|
|
10-26-2017, 11:58 PM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 882
|
Thanks to all for responding, tried again incorporating suggestions (except the side photo was still in) still no go, so moving on. Put on the list of later retries which oddly enough has a pretty good success rate.
Bob
Side photo is part of the deal- smile
 | PhotoID: 503482 Photograph © Kevin The Krazy 1 |
I was there when he took it, I tried a side shot left and no flash but a crew member hit me with a spot light, guess he didn't like the flash, but hey it wasn't me, smile.
Last edited by RobJor; 10-27-2017 at 12:01 AM.
|
|
|
10-27-2017, 02:27 PM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 571
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobJor
I was there when he took it, I tried a side shot left and no flash but a crew member hit me with a spot light, guess he didn't like the flash, but hey it wasn't me, smile.
|
I've been doing those kinds of shots for the past 11 years, and have done some in maybe a dozen states now. My thinking is more likely the guy was playing with you.  Unless you're using high powered monolights at 1/1 really close to the cab (i.e. within 30-50 ft.), the flash really isn't that noticeable.
Kent in SD
|
|
|
10-27-2017, 02:35 PM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cleveland, Rochester, Erie
Posts: 432
|
With regard to cloudy shots, it's total hit or miss. I've had this accepted:
 | PhotoID: 597065 Photograph © mtnclimberjoe |
but this rejected:
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...78&key=9130660
|
|
|
10-27-2017, 03:09 PM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hilldale, West Virginia
Posts: 3,878
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noct Foamer
I've been doing those kinds of shots for the past 11 years, and have done some in maybe a dozen states now. My thinking is more likely the guy was playing with you.  Unless you're using high powered monolights at 1/1 really close to the cab (i.e. within 30-50 ft.), the flash really isn't that noticeable.
Kent in SD
|
I think he was playing too. Crews always want the night shots when you shoot them.
Loyd L.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:15 AM.
|