11-03-2017, 04:32 PM
|
#26
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cleveland, Rochester, Erie
Posts: 431
|
I saw this posted today and thought it related to the discussion of shooting through a bridge to the other side. I like this so I may try to do a tighter crop with my shot similar to this to avoid the look of the bridge being accidentally cut off on top. Something similar to RobJor's edit, but maybe tighter. Thoughts?
 | PhotoID: 636684 Photograph © Scott Allen Sparks |
|
|
|
11-03-2017, 04:34 PM
|
#27
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cleveland, Rochester, Erie
Posts: 431
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troy12n
I have no idea about the railroads around this area, but some quick google earth investigation shows a LOT of abandoned railroad infrastructure including 2 fair sized yards
|
Yes that's the spot. The BPRR crosses over the WNYP, and there is indeed a lot of abandoned trackage and ROW in the area. Most of the signals on both RR's have been taken out of service and turned or removed as well.
|
|
|
11-03-2017, 08:04 PM
|
#28
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 533
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Cermak
I saw this posted today and thought it related to the discussion of shooting through a bridge to the other side. I like this so I may try to do a tighter crop with my shot similar to this to avoid the look of the bridge being accidentally cut off on top. Something similar to RobJor's edit, but maybe tighter. Thoughts?
 | PhotoID: 636684 Photograph © Scott Allen Sparks |
|
I think that by cutting off both sides of the bridge as well as the top, you will triple the transgression. I am surprised that this one was accepted.
__________________
Doug Lilly
My RP Pics are HERE.
I've now got a Flickr. account, too.
|
|
|
11-03-2017, 08:37 PM
|
#29
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,333
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Decapod401
I think that by cutting off both sides of the bridge as well as the top, you will triple the transgression. I am surprised that this one was accepted.
|
He really
Just
Doesn't
Listen
...
Rather than take advice, he goes out and finds something similar that was accepted. I agree the shot he found isn't a good one either.
Last edited by troy12n; 11-04-2017 at 02:16 AM.
|
|
|
11-03-2017, 08:42 PM
|
#30
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,333
|
Here's a few examples of photos I have taken with a similar type bridge as you have
None of these I consider really great shots, btw
 | PhotoID: 395308 Photograph © Troy Nolen |
 | PhotoID: 388642 Photograph © Troy Nolen |
 | PhotoID: 460433 Photograph © Troy Nolen |
 | PhotoID: 481746 Photograph © Troy Nolen |
 | PhotoID: 487393 Photograph © Troy Nolen |
 | PhotoID: 550680 Photograph © Troy Nolen |
 | PhotoID: 317414 Photograph © Troy Nolen |
 | PhotoID: 329768 Photograph © Troy Nolen |
Last edited by troy12n; 11-03-2017 at 08:45 PM.
|
|
|
11-04-2017, 01:14 AM
|
#31
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Montreal, Qc
Posts: 655
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Decapod401
I think that by cutting off both sides of the bridge as well as the top, you will triple the transgression. I am surprised that this one was accepted.
|
Same, I don't like the bridge being cut off.
|
|
|
11-06-2017, 02:56 AM
|
#32
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cleveland, Rochester, Erie
Posts: 431
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troy12n
He really
Just
Doesn't
Listen
...
Rather than take advice, he goes out and finds something similar that was accepted. I agree the shot he found isn't a good one either.
|
I didn't go out an find it, I just happened upon this while browsing the day's uploads. I get that many of you here in the forums don't seem to like this type of composition, which is a totally fine opinion. I am a fan of this style of bridge composition, and simply posted the example for further discussion, not to be a contrarian. I have listened to the advice given, but nearly all of it only applies if I go back to this location.
|
|
|
11-06-2017, 11:51 PM
|
#33
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Cermak
I didn't go out an find it, I just happened upon this while browsing the day's uploads. I get that many of you here in the forums don't seem to like this type of composition, which is a totally fine opinion. I am a fan of this style of bridge composition, and simply posted the example for further discussion, not to be a contrarian. I have listened to the advice given, but nearly all of it only applies if I go back to this location.
|
I totally understood your point of posting that pic. If you feel you'd like to try that approach, might as well give it a try. You are the one who should be happy with the shot, no one else.
But I'd also try my suggestion as well. If you've got a good zoom lens, you can stand back further, get the shot, and then get plenty clear of the ROW before the train gets anywhere close to you.
|
|
|
11-07-2017, 12:01 AM
|
#34
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cleveland, Rochester, Erie
Posts: 431
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimThias
But I'd also try my suggestion as well. If you've got a good zoom lens, you can stand back further, get the shot, and then get plenty clear of the ROW before the train gets anywhere close to you.
|
I didn't own zoom lens at the time, but it's something I am looking at purchasing soon and would try this next time I go to this location or something similar.
|
|
|
11-07-2017, 12:09 AM
|
#35
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 571
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Cermak
I didn't own zoom lens at the time, but it's something I am looking at purchasing soon and would try this next time I go to this location or something similar.
|
You really don't necessarily need a zoom. Any lens that's 300mm or 400mm can get you far enough back that train crews won't be annoyed. That said, something like a 300mm, 400mm, 500mm is an astonishingly huge pile of money compared to a competent 70-300mm zoom, or even a 200-500mm.
Kent in SD
|
|
|
11-07-2017, 12:19 AM
|
#36
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cleveland, Rochester, Erie
Posts: 431
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noct Foamer
You really don't necessarily need a zoom. Any lens that's 300mm or 400mm can get you far enough back that train crews won't be annoyed. That said, something like a 300mm, 400mm, 500mm is an astonishingly huge pile of money compared to a competent 70-300mm zoom, or even a 200-500mm.
Kent in SD
|
Yeah I currently only have a 18-105, so I'm probably going to get something like the 70-300, I had started a thread about this not too long ago, just haven't made the purchase yet.
|
|
|
11-13-2017, 01:54 PM
|
#37
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 881
|
 | PhotoID: 637732 Photograph © Robert Jordan |
I had forgone this image for a while because of the cloudy skies but maybe in this case sky adds to "charm" of the location and motive power.
Bob
|
|
|
11-13-2017, 11:14 PM
|
#38
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
|
Aha, we are showing off bridge superstructure shots!  This one reminds me of how long I have been on RP.
 | PhotoID: 166351 Photograph © Janusz Mrozek |
|
|
|
11-14-2017, 12:55 AM
|
#39
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,333
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobJor
 | PhotoID: 637732 Photograph © Robert Jordan |
I had forgone this image for a while because of the cloudy skies but maybe in this case sky adds to "charm" of the location and motive power.
Bob
|
Not a fan, or an example of how a shot should get in. The light post, the wires, not terribly sharp, kind of tight, has all the trappings of a grab shot in poor light.
|
|
|
11-20-2017, 12:53 AM
|
#40
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMDC
Aha, we are showing off bridge superstructure shots!  This one reminds me of how long I have been on RP.
|
This is probably one of my favorite RP bridge shots.
 | PhotoID: 113857 Photograph © S.A. Tish |
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:25 AM.
|