Old 01-29-2010, 07:54 AM   #1
rino54
Member
 
rino54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 86
Default Are these pictures suitable for b&w processing?

Good morning,

As I already mentionned in some other thread, I'm working on b&w pictures. I did some production recently that I suggested to the screenrs. Rejected. But mu question is: do you think these two pictures are suitable for a b&w processing? Are they good subject for this.

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...key=1122903609
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...key=1159554138

Thank for your comments

Renaud
__________________
Discover my website The Passing Trains, about Railroad Photography: http://kimandrenaud.com/renaud/en/
rino54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2010, 02:00 PM   #2
JRMDC
Senior Member
 
JRMDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
Default

The rail shot, it might help a lot if the caption gave some indication of the source of the wavy line. The given caption confuses rather than clarifies.

The station shot, for me the car presence is too strong to be a "rail" shot - there are station shots on RP but my recollection of them is they are clearly structure shots. I can see from the setting that it might be difficult to get such a shot. Maybe find a way to get some elevation?

In neither case is your BW conversion at issue. In the station shot, I do think that, aside from RP suitability in terms of content and focus, the shot is cramped and cut-off unpleasantly. It seems like it would do better as a horizontal. I am a fan of verticals but this one does not work for me in that format.
__________________
My RP pix are here.
My Flickr pix are here.

My commentaries on rail pictures are in my blog.

RP Photo Albums:
Cabooses
Engine Details
Farm and Train
Plumes!
Railroad Details
Signal Details
Switchstand Shots

Last edited by JRMDC; 01-29-2010 at 02:11 PM.
JRMDC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2010, 03:10 PM   #3
Diamond D
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 191
Default

I think the B&W conversion on both is quite nice. I like the station shot as it is, but agree that it probably won't get onto the site. In the rail shot, the squiggly line is interesting, but as a photo it just doesn't have much to it. You might want to reshoot it in a way that makes it more obvious we're looking at a rail, maybe including the spikes, looking down the rail a bit more, etc.
Diamond D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2010, 04:30 PM   #4
Dennis A. Livesey
Senior Member
 
Dennis A. Livesey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,986
Default

Agree with the previous suggestions, but only to make good shots even better.
If I was a screener, I would have approved both.
__________________
Dennis

I Foam Therefore I Am.

My pix on RailPics:

I am on Flickr as well:

"Dennis is such a God, he could do that with a camera obscura and some homemade acetate." Holloran Grade

"To me it looks drawn in in Paintshop. It looks like a puddle of orange on the sky." SFO777
Dennis A. Livesey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.