Old 06-15-2010, 06:15 PM   #1
BurghMan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 130
Default Bad Angle Question

Good afternoon (Or Good Morning for those out west)

I would welcome some input for a pair of rejections that were dinged for "Bad Angle". I haven't had this reason before. For those who haven't had it, the rejection text reads "The angle from which the image was composed is poor. This can include extreme angles below or above the subject, uninteresting angles on roster shots, and images in which the train is going away from the viewer."

The shots aren't taken from an extreme angle above or below. The are not roster shots. They aren't going away shots.

If the screener was unhappy with the composition or felt the leg of the signal bridge detracted from the photos, I could live with that. But I just don't get the "Bad Angle" rejection.

They aren't the most amazing or original shots and I can live with them not being in the database. I'm just trying to understand the rejection reason.

Many thanks!
Rich

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...&key=189532345

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...&key=848161608
BurghMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2010, 06:20 PM   #2
bigbassloyd
Senior Member
 
bigbassloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hilldale, West Virginia
Posts: 3,779
Default

The only thing I can figure is that the train itself is minimized by the angle you shot. It's basically an engine nose, with lacking detail behind it. I wouldn't exactly call it a reason for rejection, but it's all I can come up with.

Maybe you could include some more of the frame on top of the first shot too?

Loyd L.
__________________
What used to be is no more

My personal photography site
bigbassloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2010, 08:08 PM   #3
Joe the Photog
Senior Member
 
Joe the Photog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 7,902
Default

I'm not seeing Bad Angle on them as much as Bad Cropping. They're too tight. But I believe the BA may come in because there is an odd look to the train which I am guessing is coming from shooting a telephoto from a distance with a train in a curve.
__________________
Joe the Photog Dot Com
Joe the Photog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 03:44 AM   #4
wds
Senior Member
 
wds's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 793
Default

Shooting more from the left (closer to the south end of the bridge) would have made for a better angle showing more of the side of the train, but then would also draw more attention to the high sun. Returning in September or October would make for better light. Oh, and get a better tour guide! That guy you had was an idiot!

Wayne
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	20100608037.jpg
Views:	61
Size:	523.5 KB
ID:	5539  
__________________
Click Here to view my photos at RailPictures.Net!
wds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 02:53 PM   #5
coborn35
Senior Member
 
coborn35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 1,398
Default

Maybe too tight, but I love the heat distortion!
__________________
I personally have had a problem with those trying to tell us to turn railroad photography into an "art form." It's fine for them to do so, I welcome it in fact, but what I do have a problem with is that the practitioners of the more "arty" shots, I have found, tend to look down their nose's at others who are shooting more "mundane" shots.
Railroad photography is what you make of it, but one way is not "better" than another, IMHO. Unless you have a pole right thought the nose of the engine! -SG
coborn35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 01:22 PM   #6
MichaelJ
The Photo Journalist
 
MichaelJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 630
Default

I agree with the previous posters. Unfortunately, you've cropped the locomotive too tight at the bottom and cars too tight at the top. They just need a bit more room to breathe; I'd say about three times the amount of space you've allocated in the first example.
__________________
My portfolio at RailPictures.Net!
My portfolio at Flickr!

The views expressed in this reply are personal and do not represent the views or policy of my employer.
MichaelJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.