Old 10-13-2019, 09:01 PM   #1
Daniel MINACA
Member
 
Daniel MINACA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: France
Posts: 59
Default PAQ another time

Hi all,

just to share the picture, here another PAQ rejection even if mentioned in the comment, only 4 of these cranes have been built for SNCF so it's a rare picture...
Look at today the recent validated shots, some are really PAQ and taken this year... so it is not exceptional shot !
https://www.railpictures.net/viewrej...07&key=9860503
By the way I'm already banned of rejection
__________________
My RPN pictures: Here
Daniel MINACA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2019, 12:06 PM   #2
Daniel SIMON
Senior Member
 
Daniel SIMON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 324
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel MINACA View Post
Hi all,

just to share the picture, here another PAQ rejection even if mentioned in the comment, only 4 of these cranes have been built for SNCF so it's a rare picture...
Look at today the recent validated shots, some are really PAQ and taken this year... so it is not exceptional shot !
https://www.railpictures.net/viewrej...07&key=9860503
By the way I'm already banned of rejection
Hi Daniel,

To my opinion, this picture deserves to be added to the database. It shows an interesting piece of historical material.

Bien amicalement,
Daniel
Daniel SIMON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2019, 12:48 PM   #3
Decapod401
Senior Member
 
Decapod401's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 422
Default

I think that the issue is he cut off idler car. Do you have another frame with the entire flat car included?
__________________
Doug Lilly

My RP Pics are HERE.

I've now got a Flickr. account, too.
Decapod401 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2019, 01:13 PM   #4
Daniel MINACA
Member
 
Daniel MINACA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: France
Posts: 59
Default

Hi all,

Thanks Daniel !

@Doug: thanks for the reply, yes I have it but subject is the Crane and not the car even if mentioned in the comments... I will retry soon with a larger cropping but I guess that is not the rejection subject !
__________________
My RPN pictures: Here
Daniel MINACA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2019, 02:31 PM   #5
Joseph Cermak
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cleveland, Rochester, Erie
Posts: 385
Default

I could maybe see the cut off car being the problem, but it doesn't bother me too much. I would like to see the shot added, its decent documentation of the crane.
Joseph Cermak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2019, 10:19 PM   #6
Daniel MINACA
Member
 
Daniel MINACA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: France
Posts: 59
Default

Thanks for support guys but this is a bad game !
That's clear from screeners choices, they don't wants this kind of material in RPN database !
https://www.railpictures.net/viewrej...30&key=2072432
No comments.

Just an idea: Why RPN members could not vote when a picture is appealed by the author of the rejected picture ?

Just an idea !
__________________
My RPN pictures: Here
Daniel MINACA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2019, 10:29 PM   #7
bigbassloyd
Senior Member
 
bigbassloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hilldale, West Virginia
Posts: 3,734
Default

Maybe from the other end so the crane is more prominent?

Loyd L.
__________________
Social Media elevates the absurd and mediocre to a point where they aren't anymore, and that is a tragedy.

My personal photography site
bigbassloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2019, 10:49 PM   #8
Daniel MINACA
Member
 
Daniel MINACA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: France
Posts: 59
Default

It's enough !
I will not insist anymore.
It's discouraging to propose documents and to write comments !
__________________
My RPN pictures: Here
Daniel MINACA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2019, 12:13 AM   #9
TedG
Junior Member
 
TedG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Perry Hall, MD
Posts: 10
Default

Thanks for support guys but this is a bad game !
That's clear from screeners choices, they don't wants this kind of material in RPN database !
https://www.railpictures.net/viewrej...30&key=2072432

Daniel,
I certainly didn't have a problem with the first submission, but I agreed with Doug and Joe that the truncated idler car may have been the killer.

Now I'm really at a loss to explain.
/Ted
TedG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2019, 12:55 AM   #10
RobJor
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 753
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbassloyd View Post
Maybe from the other end so the crane is more prominent?

Loyd L.
I am good with the photo also, is unusual and provides detail and don't see PAQ:

However, I was curious enough to type in crane and see what has been accepted.

Static roster shots-
Most are somewhat wider view and also as Loyd suggested from the "cab" end or at least wide enough to provide detail along the whole system.

Also submitted in color.

I am also curious why it was submitted in black and white, I suppose to give that 1940's look? but as a roster shot I don't think we are aiming for artistic but rather presenting information and think although the crane is black, a color view is really what it is roster wise in 2007. Maybe a problem with color view??

Anyway when I google this I found mostly photos of models and learned a little about the company. Also I think this is considered a steam rescue crane?

Bob Jordan
RobJor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2019, 03:00 PM   #11
Grewup on the CW
Senior Member
 
Grewup on the CW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 234
Default

It is MOW equipment and while some has been accepted, I feel RP just does not want this material/subjects in "their" database regardless how well its documented or presented even though it is just as much a part of railroading as the locos we photograph.
Grewup on the CW is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.