01-19-2011, 10:03 PM
|
#26
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 1,398
|
You can snort glue?
__________________
I personally have had a problem with those trying to tell us to turn railroad photography into an "art form." It's fine for them to do so, I welcome it in fact, but what I do have a problem with is that the practitioners of the more "arty" shots, I have found, tend to look down their nose's at others who are shooting more "mundane" shots.
Railroad photography is what you make of it, but one way is not "better" than another, IMHO. Unless you have a pole right thought the nose of the engine! -SG
|
|
|
01-19-2011, 10:20 PM
|
#27
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,800
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by coborn35
You can snort glue?
|
Must be something in the air in Candyland.
|
|
|
01-19-2011, 11:53 PM
|
#28
|
RailPictures.Net Crew
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Nitro, WV
Posts: 2,194
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbassloyd
I would love to play bridge at a booby bar, while watching football...
Loyd L.
|
Is that a Friday night in Hilldale, Loyd?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holloran Grade
If you mean my shot with the toy, no, that is a separate project.
If you have ever tried to photograph toys especially action figures, it is not as easy as one might think.
Especially in natural light.
Mostly experimenting at the moment with Mr. Stewart.
This shot was actually during a lull in the action due to a stuck switch.

|
Would you be willing to do a workshop on photographing action figures for us?
Quote:
Originally Posted by IHapsias
I think not to this getting accepted.
With all due respect, is that something you think you would see on the database?
The screener's have been accepting "ridiculous stuff" as said by some people. By submitting this, I think you have the idea in your head that the screener's are going to accept it?
Just saying, I may be wrong.
|
Do you have much room to talk with your two near identical photos in the DB?
Chase
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 02:03 AM
|
#29
|
Met Fan
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,040
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by coborn35
You can snort glue?
|
Missed the class trip to the local police station in Fifth Grade, huh?
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 02:20 AM
|
#30
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 1,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chase55671
Do you have much room to talk with your two near identical photos in the DB?
Chase
|
Chase please take the Forum Monitor sash off, this is getting old. We have already hashed this out.
__________________
I personally have had a problem with those trying to tell us to turn railroad photography into an "art form." It's fine for them to do so, I welcome it in fact, but what I do have a problem with is that the practitioners of the more "arty" shots, I have found, tend to look down their nose's at others who are shooting more "mundane" shots.
Railroad photography is what you make of it, but one way is not "better" than another, IMHO. Unless you have a pole right thought the nose of the engine! -SG
Last edited by coborn35; 01-20-2011 at 02:35 AM.
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 02:29 AM
|
#31
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NS Greenville District
Posts: 1,473
|
I was thinking about posting something saying that Coborn was the police of the police, but then that might make me the police of the police of the police.
__________________
Peter Lewis | Portfolio | Profile | Flickr | Facebook
Canon EOS 40D
Canon EF 50 f/1.8 II
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L USM
Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A Friend
everytime i see non-train photos of yours i think, "so much talent. wasted on trains."
|
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 02:35 AM
|
#32
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 1,398
|
Peter you are the original forum police... I'm not telling Chase to, its just really annoying.
__________________
I personally have had a problem with those trying to tell us to turn railroad photography into an "art form." It's fine for them to do so, I welcome it in fact, but what I do have a problem with is that the practitioners of the more "arty" shots, I have found, tend to look down their nose's at others who are shooting more "mundane" shots.
Railroad photography is what you make of it, but one way is not "better" than another, IMHO. Unless you have a pole right thought the nose of the engine! -SG
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 02:44 AM
|
#33
|
RailPictures.Net Crew
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Nitro, WV
Posts: 2,194
|
You seem to be part of every argument, Max. Instead of bitching about everything you dislike about each individual contributor, perhaps you should consider posting more useful information.
Not sure why you pick at every comment, but that's what I think is really getting old.
Chase
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 02:45 AM
|
#34
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 1,398
|
Im only picking at all the comments you have been making criticizing people for erroneous reasons.
__________________
I personally have had a problem with those trying to tell us to turn railroad photography into an "art form." It's fine for them to do so, I welcome it in fact, but what I do have a problem with is that the practitioners of the more "arty" shots, I have found, tend to look down their nose's at others who are shooting more "mundane" shots.
Railroad photography is what you make of it, but one way is not "better" than another, IMHO. Unless you have a pole right thought the nose of the engine! -SG
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 02:54 AM
|
#35
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NS Greenville District
Posts: 1,473
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by coborn35
Peter you are the original forum police... I'm not telling Chase to, its just really annoying.
|
Well, I knew you were going to say that, and though I do lean that way, I turned in my resignation form to the department two hours ago.
__________________
Peter Lewis | Portfolio | Profile | Flickr | Facebook
Canon EOS 40D
Canon EF 50 f/1.8 II
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L USM
Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A Friend
everytime i see non-train photos of yours i think, "so much talent. wasted on trains."
|
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 02:56 AM
|
#36
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 1,398
|
Good man. Does anyone else think that the forum and railpics have really been "off" the last couple of weeks?
__________________
I personally have had a problem with those trying to tell us to turn railroad photography into an "art form." It's fine for them to do so, I welcome it in fact, but what I do have a problem with is that the practitioners of the more "arty" shots, I have found, tend to look down their nose's at others who are shooting more "mundane" shots.
Railroad photography is what you make of it, but one way is not "better" than another, IMHO. Unless you have a pole right thought the nose of the engine! -SG
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 03:09 AM
|
#37
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 759
|
I agree Max. It is just like a high-school cafeteria. Plenty of dumb put-downs and comebacks. You guys bicker over every little thing.
Last edited by stlgevo51; 01-20-2011 at 03:23 AM.
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 03:29 AM
|
#38
|
RailPictures.Net Crew
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Nitro, WV
Posts: 2,194
|
It's society in general going downhill.
Chase
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 04:19 AM
|
#39
|
-_-
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hiltons, Virginia, USA
Posts: 953
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holloran Grade
So what do you think I could do to get this on the Site?
Reason(s) for Rejection: - Poor Esthetic Quality: This rejection reason means that the photo is of low esthetic qualities, or is simply not the type of material we are wishing to publish.
Moto-Cross Champion James Stewart Watches a Westbound Stacker - New Years Eve 2010 Series
While trapped in a sand berm along side Highway 138 in the Cajon Pass near C.P. Summit for an undetermined period of time ( follow this link ) moto-cross racer James Stewart gained an appreciation for the hobby of ralfaning.
Consequently, he became a hard core railfan once he was rescued and now plans to tour Southern California watching and photographing trains.
Here Mr. Stewart spends a chilly New Years eve watching a Westbound stack train pound through the station at Fullerton California in route to the Port of Los Angeles.
BNSF San Bernardino Subdivision at Mile Post 165 - Fullerton Train Station.
(December 31, 2010)
Other adventures of James Stewart:
Skiing Cajon http://www.flickr.com/photos/36722129@N06/5330940809/
Railfaning Cajon http://www.flickr.com/photos/3672212...n/photostream/
|
Excellent Bokeh on the train. Great isolation of subject.
No but really thats funny.
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 04:21 AM
|
#40
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pittsburgh,PA
Posts: 675
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by coborn35
Good man. Does anyone else think that the forum and railpics have really been "off" the last couple of weeks?
|
Not at all. They're back to exactly where they used to be. All is right in the world.
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 05:19 AM
|
#41
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,800
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PLEzero
Not at all. They're back to exactly where they used to be. All is right in the world.
|
Not until Mike B. comes back.
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 05:21 AM
|
#42
|
-_-
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hiltons, Virginia, USA
Posts: 953
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimThias
Not until Mike B. comes back. 
|
Oh God.. Anyone but Mike Banned.
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 05:22 AM
|
#43
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 497
|
Whhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 05:43 AM
|
#44
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pittsburgh,PA
Posts: 675
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimThias
Not until Mike B. comes back. 
|
Be careful. I think you can get banned by just mentioning his name these days.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:09 PM.
|