Old 08-25-2012, 11:11 PM   #1
mp16dot39
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 145
Default Shorline Rejections

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...15&key=4114564

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...59&key=3676873

I understand the underexposure on the first shot, but as for that shot's composition, and the BC on the second shot, any tips?

Bill
__________________
My Pics on RP

Last edited by mp16dot39; 08-25-2012 at 11:13 PM.
mp16dot39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2012, 11:46 PM   #2
JimThias
Senior Member
 
JimThias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,838
Default

I think the train is too buried in the first shot for it to have a chance. You need more of the train's silhouette for that scene to work.
__________________
.
Rhymes with slice, rice and mice, and probably should be spelled like "Tice."

This pretty much sums it up: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Thias
JimThias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2012, 11:55 PM   #3
mp16dot39
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 145
Default

Yeah. It is majorly cropped (alot chopped off either side), but maybe ill just chuck that one than. Any advice for the second shot?
__________________
My Pics on RP
mp16dot39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 12:31 AM   #4
Joe the Photog
Senior Member
 
Joe the Photog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 7,905
Default

I would let the second shot go, because the shot of that train that you got accepted is by far the est of the two.
__________________
Joe the Photog Dot Com
Joe the Photog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.