Old 09-07-2013, 05:42 PM   #1
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,333
Default Fundamental cropping questions in here - opinions wanted

Before I start, this would be one of those golden opportunities for the screeners / administrators to step out of the shadows and "help us help them", or at least share the reasoning behind their actions.

In regards to cropping and compositional theory and practice, and to some degree RP rejections, I have a couple questions.

These questions mostly relate to situations when shooting in mountainous terrain, or when you have something in the background which is not related at all to the subject of the photograph.

1. Shooting at grade level with an oncoming train, you have a long telephoto and in the background is a mountain or ridge, but it's quite a bit above the train. Is it acceptable to crop it a little loose to show the top of the mountain line to give perspective to the shot? In this instance the train would be "low" in the frame.

2. Shooting a wide angle or medium "landscape" type shot, where you have the train kind of low in the shot, and have a lot of sky with some interesting cloud formations in the distance, but high in the frame. Normally one would say "too much sky", and I would agree if there was not something there, like a big thunderhead, the moon or sun rising, alien spacecraft, etc

I think sometimes the concept of "dead space" is misplaced or misapplied.


Last edited by troy12n; 09-07-2013 at 05:44 PM.
troy12n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2013, 05:44 PM   #2
Senior Member
MagnumForce's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 602

You are totally overthinking and overgeneralizing it, IMO. It is all a case by case basis in my view.
-Brent Kneebush
Defiance, Ohio
MagnumForce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2013, 01:51 AM   #3
Joe the Photog
A dude with a camera
Joe the Photog's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 7,962

Originally Posted by MagnumForce View Post
You are totally overthinking and overgeneralizing it, IMO. It is all a case by case basis in my view.
Dead on here on both counts!
Joseph C. Hinson Photography
Joe the Photog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2013, 07:47 AM   #4
Senior Member
Mgoldman's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,688

Yup - case by case (or as it might appear - screener to screener).

Sometimes, if you can't make it work, it wasn't a shot worth taking.

Other times, you can go with a panorama or even a crop ratio that RP is not accepting.

And sometimes, it IS worth the less then perfect crop (catenary poles, for instance). That's when the case by case issue shows up - though, I've had identical images with different motive power where one is accepted and the other is not. THAT is where the frustration arrives.

Mgoldman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 10:32 AM   #5
I shoot what I like
milwman's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cedar Fall's, Iowa
Posts: 2,474
Send a message via Yahoo to milwman

As long as the rule of thirds is followed it will get in, Shoot that way if one wants it in? Or shoot it your way in the long run who cares if they like it as long as you do!
Richard Scott Marsh I go by Scott long story

milwman is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.