Old 05-12-2004, 05:04 AM   #1
tjelmel
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2
Default Fairly New To RR Photography-need advice

Hello, I have gotten into railroad photography within the last year or so. I have a few pictures on here and am in the midst of a trip that I hope will produce some more. The following picture was rejected for being underexposed. Since I don't have a background in photography, what technically does this mean and how can I prevent it in the future? Is this something that can be fixed with photo editing software? Thanks for any and all advice.

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=13132
tjelmel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2004, 12:37 PM   #2
Curtis Wininger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Blacksburg, VA/Gate City, VA
Posts: 120
Send a message via ICQ to Curtis Wininger Send a message via AIM to Curtis Wininger Send a message via MSN to Curtis Wininger
Default

Underexposed means the shutter that exposes light to the film didn't stay open long enough. In turn, there isn't enough light striking the film which pretty much means it's going to be too dark. The film is 'underexposed' to light. The same goes for digital cameras too, just replace film with image sensor.

You can see the mountains in the background are a little dark. This is a nice setup. Some of the problem could probably be fixed with photo editing software but it won't replace good, old fashioned sunlight.

I don't know what kind of camera you are using. If you are really interested in photography, you're best friend will be an SLR camera. That will allow you to play around and learn more than a point and shoot, auto everything, just press the button and it may turn out ok camera. Read about photography on the Interent and try what you have read. I usually suggest the National Geographic Field Guide series. These books are pretty inexpensive and have helped me a lot in the past. I own two of them. They are around $20 new on Amazon.
__________________
------------
Curtis Wininger
RailPictures.net Photo Screener
Curtis Wininger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2004, 03:05 PM   #3
tjelmel
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2
Default

Thanks for the info. I'll try to lighten it up a bit w/the computer. I have started with a Kodak digital camera and it is great, especially to take on trips so I can take lots of pictures for little $$ and wait until I get home to decide which are good enough to keep. I can already see, however, than a more advanced camera would allow for more user input in taking pictures, but I think I better wait to make that investment until I have some more experience.
tjelmel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2004, 08:30 PM   #4
Joe
Senior Member
 
Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Posts: 355
Send a message via AIM to Joe
Default

I see you got that photo accepted!
Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2004, 10:27 PM   #5
BartY
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 36
Default

FWIW, most images captured by digital cameras take a little manipulation before they are presentable. Like slide film, digital sensors don't like over-exposure, so some manufacturers deliberately put a little under-exposure in the exposure program of the camera, leaving you to bump it back up in a photo editing program.

Bart
BartY is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.