03-26-2014, 06:54 PM
|
#1
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 185
|
Fooled me
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...85&key=9940516
And here I thought I was going to be dinged for bad cropping. Ha!
It was a bad day for train pix, as I recall. Couldn't persuade the sun to move.
|
|
|
03-26-2014, 07:28 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,641
|
Try uploading on a Friday or Tuesday?
Considering the nature of the subject (age, fallen flag, and the fact that the nose is in fact well lit), you would think it would follow others of a similar nature into the database.
If you have in your editing program a shadow fill feature, give that a shot. Selectively if possible - try to bring some light /exposure /detail to the side of the engine and specifically, the trucks.
Remember - posting on RP is like a coin toss. Despite what you believe your odds are based on past images accepted, each current upload always resets to a 50/50 shot at getting in. That's what we all love about RP.
/Mitch
|
|
|
03-26-2014, 08:32 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA area
Posts: 718
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mgoldman
That's what we all love about RP.
/Mitch
|
What is your  definition  of love?
__________________
Carl
My RP pics are HERE
My website is HERE
|
|
|
03-26-2014, 11:30 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,775
|
Well the reason is legit but its still a cool shot, any chance you took a vertical frame as the train was coming around the curve?
|
|
|
03-27-2014, 12:33 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,641
|
|
|
|
03-27-2014, 12:59 AM
|
#6
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,333
|
For what it's worth, I like the shot. Despite it being backlit. Which, it is a legit rejection. But they break that rule all the time...
|
|
|
03-27-2014, 01:19 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,775
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mgoldman
|
Legit in a world where the screeners actually applied their own rules I should say. At this point the application of the rules are so arbitrary that they may as well stop screening all together.
|
|
|
03-27-2014, 02:22 AM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,800
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mgoldman
|
To be fair, that shot was accepted nearly 3.5 years ago. They weren't as picky "back then."
|
|
|
03-27-2014, 02:24 AM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,800
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikos1
Legit in a world where the screeners actually applied their own rules I should say.
|
Cue the cool movie voice guy....
"In a world, where the screeners actually applied their own rules..."
(feel free to finish that line)
|
|
|
03-27-2014, 02:32 AM
|
#10
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,333
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimThias
Cue the cool movie voice guy....
"In a world, where the screeners actually applied their own rules..."
|
I thought the same thing, btw, that guy died a year or so ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_LaFontaine
|
|
|
03-27-2014, 02:38 AM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,800
|
Yeah, that was a bummer when I heard the news. There is another guy currently doing them that is nearly as good, but he'll never be a Don LaFontaine. The Geico ad that Don did was great.
|
|
|
03-27-2014, 02:59 AM
|
#12
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 185
|
Quote:
Cue the cool movie voice guy....
"In a world, where the screeners actually applied their own rules..."
(feel free to finish that line)
|
"... There was a small band of photographers who dared to break them. The Few ... The Fearless ... The REJECTS!!"
(Cue music crescendo)
|
|
|
03-27-2014, 05:55 AM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,641
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimThias
To be fair, that shot was accepted nearly 3.5 years ago. They weren't as picky "back then." 
|
And this was not accepted in 2011. Did it get better in 2014?
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphot...=467672&nseq=1
/Mitch
|
|
|
03-27-2014, 07:54 AM
|
#14
|
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 62
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mgoldman
|
Too bad that engine is now working at a landfill in Fostoria. Cool pic.
__________________
They call me Mr. Negativity
|
|
|
03-27-2014, 08:24 AM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,641
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Insert_Name_Here
Too bad that engine is now working at a landfill in Fostoria. Cool pic.
|
Explain, please.
That engine was "recently" painted and is part of the collection of the Illinois Railroad Museum in Union, IL. Sometimes historical societies will lease an engine in return for funds, maintenance or a paint job which is a good deal for all parties involved. I have not heard anything about the IRM doing so, however.
/Mitch
|
|
|
03-27-2014, 01:17 PM
|
#16
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 258
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Insert_Name_Here
Too bad that engine is now working at a landfill in Fostoria. Cool pic.
|
I think THIS is the engine you are thinking of.
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphot...96593&nseq=251
__________________
"Never argue with a stupid person. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience."
My RP.net Photos
My Flickr Photos
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:44 AM.
|