View Single Post
Old 09-13-2011, 03:42 AM   #9
jnohallman
Senior Member
 
jnohallman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,527
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stlgevo51 View Post
I shoot with a EF 24-105mm IS. I think the problem has more to do with the processing of raw images. My jpegs look fine (not exceptional, but good) while the raw files look bad. I will try to put a comparison up to see what you all think.
Are you saying your RAW files look bad after post-processing? Because if you haven't done any and are looking at the original RAW image, I'd expect it not to look as good as the JPEG, which has had sharpening, saturation adjustments and so on applied based on your in-camera settings.

Jon
__________________
"Everybody talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it." - Mark Twain

Click here to see my photos on RP.net!

Do not, under any circumstances whatsoever, click here. Don't even think about it. I'm warning you!
jnohallman is offline   Reply With Quote