View Single Post
Old 11-03-2007, 11:38 PM   #37
JRMDC
Senior Member
 
JRMDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trainboysd40
If it's a double exposure, I have no problem with it. If in fact it was edited in in photoshop (Or, heaven forbid, MS paint!) then I would have trouble accepting it as genuine!
That is logically inconsistent. If the end result is the same, why is it acceptable to do via double exposure but not via PS?

In my view, not every manipulation that is possible should be acceptable for RP. I think this one should not have been accepted. Unless RP is turning a new leaf in terms of the dimensions of allowable creativity. Their site, of course, not mine.
__________________
My RP pix are here.
My Flickr pix are here.

My commentaries on rail pictures are in my blog.

RP Photo Albums:
Cabooses
Engine Details
Farm and Train
Plumes!
Railroad Details
Signal Details
Switchstand Shots
JRMDC is offline   Reply With Quote