View Single Post
Old 04-21-2021, 04:51 PM   #6
br_railphotos
Member
 
br_railphotos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Eastern Iowa
Posts: 54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Decapod401 View Post
Greg,

I'm with you. After an initial rejection for color/hue for what I feel was an acceptable shot,

https://www.railpictures.net/viewrej...60&key=5027957

I went through two more similar rejections before posting a final try this morning. I received a grain/noise rejection.

https://www.railpictures.net/viewrej...67&key=9014327

Really? When the exaggeration of grain/noise that started this thread is sitting in a TO24 spot?

I'm tired of having my balls busted when there is such inconsistency here. Maybe JMF was right.
Inconsistency, as well as holding out on further gripes, gets me. On more than one occasion, I've had photos rejected for one thing only to be rejected for another, later. If the screener(s) would list ALL of their gripes right off, it would save the screener(s) and photographers time! I actually wrote the screeners a note about this very thing a few months ago. Obviously, they don't listen to suggestions of lowly peasants.
br_railphotos is offline   Reply With Quote